OP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] New Lists are now active
>
> Thank you very much for your efforts.
> It is appreciated.
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Richard Blewett
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > The main website is
> >
> > http:/
The main website is
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe
And the address to post messages is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enjoy the new home
Regards
Richard
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscriptio
patience
Richard Blewett
CTO
DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
;d be without the listserver software, just the
> posts
> plus some basic pages to allow browsing/viewing them. In other words,
> archive only unless/until I code up some .aspx pages to handle posting,
> which could take a week or two as I'm quite busy at the moment. But if
> no
I'm still working on getting the list rehosted
Rich
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Warner
> Sent: 23 September 2008 14:08
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Ha
Sorry, here
http://www.mail-archive.com/advanced-dotnet@discuss.develop.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Blewett
> Sent: 10 September 2008 07:13
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISC
Just a heads up that the archive appears to be accessible here
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Blewett
> Sent: 09 Septe
>> http://groups.google.com/group/advanced-dotnet and you can
> >>>>
> >>>> simply join
> >>>
> >>> the group.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sébastien
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Greg Youn
anything you need from the archives
Thanks for your involvement over the last few years
Richard Blewett
CTO
DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
retObj = (T)Activator.GetObject(type, "tcp://" + serverName +
> > ":" + port.ToString() + "/" + objUri);
> >
> > They are not using a single instance or anything.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> > -Origina
Are the calls using the same proxy or do they both spin up their own proxy
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk/weblog2
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jer
dress] />
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk/weblog2
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
> Sent: 28 Febr
Dispose also returns the connection to the connection pool
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smotritsky, Alex
> Sent: 16 October 2007 22:01
> To:
Well yes,
But if you end up running it on an interned string you could upset alot of
people ;-)
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stoyan Damov
> Sent:
code executing in it gets
terminated (the JIT Cache gets dumped, etc, etc).
So is the issue simply that you are not explicitly unloading the AppDomain?
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [
ThreadingModel=Both then have the server side
call this on an MTA thread and the ActiveX control call it on it's STA
thread. Anything else is going to be a hack and hack in COM always lead to
alot of pain somewhere down the road
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original
know its threadsafe? If it truely is thread safe and ok to call from
an MTA thread you could try setting your threading model to Both and see if
VS will be happy with that (I've not tested that).
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion
I have a couple of questions.
Is the control a UI element or is it just a component you want to use for
automation purposes that doesn;t have a UI (say like a timer)?
Have you authored the control or is it a component developed elsewhere?
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Origi
age Collector, but it is ALWAYS a good idea and good
> programming
> practice to clean up resources that you use.
Sorry, I wasn't disagreeing with your setting variables to null - just
saying that it made no difference at runtime in *most* cases.
Regards
Richard Blewett - Develo
nefit
your code.
>
> Following these techniques, I do not get memory leaks.
>
I assume you always unbind event handlers when you're finished as this is a
common cause of memory leaks too
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Are you attempting to stream the content or send a large message such that
the receiver processes the whole payload once all has been sent and
received?
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
&g
> I agree that maybe it is more applicable for JIT to do all
> optimizations, that however doesn't change the original question
> regarding the number of boxings at the time Console.WriteLine executes
> (be it JIT or CSC optimization). And if it is, statistically, worth the
> effort, it would be of
d and therefore no boxing.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igal Yoffe
> Sent: 07 August 2007 08:20
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: [AD
to be a listserv admin that we could e-mail...is that you
> Rich?
> Or is there someone officially responsible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn Wildermuth
> http://adoguy.com
> http://wildermuthconsulting.com
> Microsoft MVP (C#), MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker
>
> -Original Mess
components that need
the other config file into a separate appdomain, setting its config file
location before you do.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Booth
Done
Please be aware that this list is no longer moderated and therefore issues
like this can only be resolved if we notice a problem or someone brings it
to our attention.
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:AD
latter now and stick to the subject please
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert L. Stewart
Sent: 25 November 2006 09:07
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re
an of course attend a refresher course :-)
Regards
Richard Blewett
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stefan
Sent: 26 September 2006 16:48
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Biztalk.
You'd like me to block [EMAIL PROTECTED] That appears to be your email
address Paul
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
Sent: 02 August 2006 08:25
To: ADVANCED-D
from the shell then I get a new process.
I'm running IE6 on Win2003
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
You tried running sgen.exe against the types to pre-gen the serialization
assembly?
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Phil D
Sent: 11 July 2006 20:16
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET
We had a problem with our listserv which has taken longer than expected to
resolve. Hopefully we should now be back up and running smoothly
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives
I assume that when the control is hosted in IE then it is running with
partial trust. In that case it won't have the right to call Assert (which is
a security perm)
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[
That user has now been removed from the list
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
Erstwhile List Moderator
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
Sent: 29 April 2006 13:39
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Please do not reply to this thread. Mr Charles has been removed from the
list.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
(Erstwhile List Moderator)
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Charles
Sent: 07 November
Wow it's been a while since I had to do one of these!
Please do not respond to this thread anymore. I do not want to have to take
this list back in to moderated status.
(not picking on Ernst he was just the most recent poster)
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
-Original Me
You need to fully qualify the aseumbly name in the wellknown element
type="MyNamespace.RemotingServiceImpl, RemotingService, Version=1.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=1243fac112c"
> objectUri="RemotingService.rem" />
Regards
Richard Bl
StackFrame sf = new StackFrame(0);
string typeName = sf.GetMethod().DeclaringType.Name;
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk/weblog
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk
> -Original Message-
> From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
>
If it pains you to have a *Form* reference in this component keep an
ISynchronizeInvoke instead (this is the interface designed to model the
marshalling to the correct thread.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk/weblog
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk
There are many ways to get humans involved in business processes defined
within BizTalk with using HWS. HWS is designed to be used by 3rd party ISVs
to create workflow products that run on top of the BizTalk engine - e.g [1]
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://www.dotnetcsonult.co.uk
Type.GetType("System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException, System.Data,
Version=1.0.5000.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" );
In other words you have to specify both the fully qualified type name and
the fully qualified assembly name
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopM
Locking the syncroot will only help if all code locks it or you create a
synchonrized collection which will use the syncroot internally in add /
remove operations
I blogged about this recenly at [1]
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
[1]
http
here is no ambiguity about who should
call Dispose.
By the way, I'm not arguing that IDisposable is a bad thing it just doesn't
solve *every* problem with resource management.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
-Original Message-
F
d of costs
are important to you, you should probably be avoiding virtual dispatch all
together.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
in hand if you can. Nothing is
achieved by a fully fledged on-list slanging match - no matter how justified
you feel it may be. I will deal with any issues off list and hopefully that
will be all that is required.
Thanks for generally playing nice ;-)
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
-Origin
others to look at
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Snyder, Chris
Sent: 21 July 2004 18:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
to put me back there - I spent my
entire life moderating and virtually stopped posting to lists as a result.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ating different
pars of the UI on different threads
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Snyder, Chris
Sent: 20 July 2004 20:28
To: [
om: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Blewett
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Threading, UI, and web service problem
How is the user able to interact with the UI during the WebServic
e the UI from a thread other than the UI
thread (which is the one your user is managing to interact with as they
change the combobox selection.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced
"two
levels of derivation" looks potentially fragile. (We sometimes derive
from a custom Web Form class rather than directly from Page.) Just a
suggestion.
--
Ivan Towlson
White Carbon
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
will look will
depend on your application architecture.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manuel Patrone
Sent: 15 July 2004 19:33
To
here they are
declared. As local variables they will be allocated on the stack but for
this class:
class Person
{
public in Age;
}
The age will be allocated on the managed heap, inline with the rest of the
Person object.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richard
Maybe purely a naming thing - but it looks as if you are trying to make two
interfaces as remotable types (the ones starting with I).
The remoting infrastructure is going to try to create an instance of the
types you specify in the element and interfaces are not
instantiatable.
Regards
Richard
to an unmoderated list
(you're all very well behaved these days anyway ;-) )
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.659 / Virus Database: 423 - Release Date:
you can say is that it always returns IAsyncResult and it's last two
parameters are always AsyncCallback and object.
In a similar vein I guess there would be no mention of Delegate.Invoke for
similar reasons
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Mode
IIRC correctly the ThreadPool class is marginally faster although generally
a bit less programmer friendly.
And yes, they both queue work up to the CLR threadpool.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto
Well I stand corrected - I just looked at the code using Reflector and
that’s exactly what happens :-)
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitriy Z
Control.Invoke uses SendMessage internally and Control.BeginInvoke uses
PostMessage.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Davis
> Sent: 01 Marc
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Tomiczek
> Sent: 23 February 2004 07:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Thread with messa
re
hitting that "send" button.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 13/02/2004
===
This list is
t. That was the original point of the argument started: xml is
> not needed in that situation, so leave it out of it, no matter how much
> code is generated behind the scenes to produce xml on teh fly.
>
> FB
>
Well if you want to boxes to talk to eachother an
Bill stated he only had one table. Therefore an identity column would
suffice. For flexibility and extensibility though personally I would always
go for guids in this situation.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
ex problem - can you be sure that A and B won't add
the same customer, thus creating two database records for the same business
entity. This is a problem domain specific issue and not one that can be
solved with a simple general solution.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Me
Yes, I noticed that, I can see it working across AppDomain, but cross
process is doubtful and cross machine definitely wouldn't work.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I wrote a named event wrapper a while back which you can download from [1].
In the Thread Utilities project
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
[1] http://staff.develop.com/richardb/#DotNet
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL
I think you meant
Gacutil -u
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SteveC
Sent: 10 January 2004 04:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Re Removing a referenced
inconvenience and happy holidays (for those of you who
celebrate this holiday)
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.554 / Virus Database: 346 - Release Date: 20/12/2003
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.AppendRelativeSearchPath()
Should give you what you want
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JD
Sent: 12 December 2003 20:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I've just noticed this has been cross posted to the DOTNET-CLR list as well.
Can we carry on discussion there please so the thread does not become
fragmented.
I will, therefore, not approve any more messages on this thread on the
advanced list
Thanks
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Ori
walk. Without doing this the GC would never be able to
collect anything in gen0 just in case it was referenced from an object in
another generation
Amazing what occurs to you in the shower ;-)
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET t
#x27;s GC was a
strong counter-example. Now most modern GCs have complicated adaptive
heuristics to decide when, whether and where to compact. Things will get
more interesting in the future:
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
[1]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dndotnet
.cs where I get the length of the
stored data. I cast to a byte at one point instead of a long - so the amount
of data you can successfully store is pretty small ;-)
I'll get a fix out asap
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of
ack of
info, etc) then resend it as it may have been inadvertently deleted amongst
the spam.
This is not a call for those who get their messages rejected for a specified
reason to continually repost - this will only get you banned from the list.
Sorry for any inconvenience
Richard Blewett
these?
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Merrill
Sent: 16 September 2003 13:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [inbox] Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] How to read MVID and assembly hash
What does Marshal.GetLastWin32Error give you on failure?
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tanveer
Sent: 30 August 2003 10:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [inbox
populate it
}
return myhashtable[s];
so you see its not lunatic coding that led us to discover this
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Merrill
Sent: 28 August 2003 17:52
Joe, as you can see from the bare bones version I posted it doesn't have to
do with using per se but rather having an empty try as the last statement of
an if statement
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[m
ld? Its a bug in the
optimizer.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:
2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond
http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet
G
>Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 2001-2002. All rights reserved.
>
>C:\>test
>in if
>in else
>
>Regards,
>Jeroen
>
>>
My bad, forgot to use the /optimize switch - yep it is the cammand line one
too.
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
===
Another update: this bug is another instance where it is Visual Studio's
compilation that causes the problem. The command line compiler does not
exhibit the same problem
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®
args)
{
if( args.Length == 0 )
{
Console.WriteLine("in if");
try
{
}
finally
{
}
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("in else"
le.WriteLine("ending called");
}
}
commenting out the using block in the if block or putting code after the
using block in the if resolves the problem
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http:
ur is always easier to maintain.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Holdermans
Sent: 19 June 2003 21:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Part
olved his problem.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Ferguson
Sent: 17 June 2003 14:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] command object
What is the
contention.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jérôme Grelier
Sent: 25 March 2003 14:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transactions on SQL Server with ado.net
Hi
If you're going to do serious work with CF and P/Invoke, you will
definitely need to know C++. CF has very rudimentary support for interop
compared with the full framework. Some things can only be achieved by
writing C++ shims to make the marshalling simpler.
Regards
Richard Bl
You thought of using shared memory? In the early days of the .NET betas
more than one person wrapped the win32 API to provide managed access.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
to
prevent duplication of info.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brady Gaster
Sent: 03 December 2002 16:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] CodeDOM the "
wed as it will just spin out into a row about their
merits.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:ADVANCED-DOTNET@;DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM]On Behalf Of Phil Parker
Sent: 05 November 2002 19:48
To: [EMAIL P
The problem is that AFAIK, this doesn't work for things like the SQL managed
provider and Oracle provider as they are not dependent on OLEDB (or ODBC,
etc) - but I use it for all my connections strings when I first hit a data
source outside of the native managed providers.
Regards
Ri
Rotor is the Shared Source implementation of .NET
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?URL=/downloads/sample.asp?ur
l=/MSDN-FILES/027/001/901/msdncompositedoc.xml
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
the machine (it only ships with the sdk and not the
redist)
3. running the application (sn.exe) under an admin account
So at least make 2 harder by only putting the redist on to deployment
machines.
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET
scan every list for messages cross
posted to this one.
Sorry if this seems heavy handed but I have had to deal with 12 cross
postings just today.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
[1]
http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0210A&L=ADVANCED-DOTNET&P=R
606&I=-3
---
Outg
Sorry about that. My finger hit the approve rather than delete button ;-)
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of admin
Sent: 06 October 2002 14:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
String is a reference type
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ben Kloosterman
Sent: 19 September 2002 11:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Funny in Visual
it happens I was sitting next to a guy from MCS when I checked this so
he's logging it as a bug
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Hewitt
Sent: 19 September 2002
the source for xsd.exe (or at lease a version of it) ships with Rotor.
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Murphy
Sent: 12 September 2002 14:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
ed, it
may be that they just haven't been approved.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pradeep
Tapadiya
Sent: 29 July 2002 18:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANC
Because, assuming you don't write the client, the client developer would
need access to your private key
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Dierking
Sent: 27 June 2002
100 matches
Mail list logo
