In code review meetings, people often look at me funny when I come
down so strongly against classes subscribing to their own events -- in
lieu of simply overriding a corresponding virtual method.
Let this be a lesson to you kids out there: more moving parts = more
broken code.
Thanks for the
[Editor's note: I just glanced at the code... forgive me if I'm
missing something more subtle.]
Event subscriptions are reachable references. The Form2 instances are
subscribing to an event, but never unsubscribing... the event source
is statically reachable.
Some of us call this the lapsed
/blog
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van Ness
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:20 PM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Understanding Events
[Editor's note
I'm not sure about targeting both 1.0 and 1.1 from VS.Net 2003
We do this in my shop... we use VS2k3, but we do our official builds
w/ NAnt.exe -t:net-1.0, in at least two scenarios: (1) we build
component SDKs, and we want the widest possible customer base, and (2)
we make little powertoy
You need SecurityPermission.UnmanagedCode to acquire a named Mutex.
This is sortof an unavoidable fact of life: otherwise, malicious
controls could potentially interfere with other apps, by acquiring
their Mutex(es).
As hacky as it sounds, creating and/or locking a file in Isolated
Storage might
Fernando, that is the most obscure .NET development trick I've ever
seen. You are either a genius, or a madman.
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
Just use the 1.0.* syntax for the AssemblyVersion attribute --
decoding the low-order 32 bits is pretty easy. Here's a small
JScript.NET program I wrote to do it...
-S
//
// DecodeVer.js
//
import System;
// Parse command line.
var arg1:String = Environment.GetCommandLineArgs()[1];
var
of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van
Ness
Sent: 25 January 2005 17:25
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Determing time when a assembly was built
Don't you just love it when you get answers explaining exactly how
Thanks Jeroen!
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
I'm attempting a managed implementation of a COM interface, which
enumerates structures... (The interface is ISyncMgrEnumItems, defined
in MobSync.idl, for anyone who wants to play along.)
Here's the relevant snippet of IDL:
HRESULT Next(
[in] ULONG celt,
[out, size_is(celt),
/obsolete resources),
easily localized, and run down-level without a hitch.
http://www.windojitsu.com/blog/resxsucks.html
Thanks again, everyone... Happy Holidays!
-S
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:12:36 -0800, Shawn A. Van Ness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The vs.net project converter seems to do
What is the advantage of having autogenerated CLSID's, my observation is
that they causes trouble when unregistering assemblies used with COM
interop.
Of course that causes trouble -- if your CLSID changes with every
build, your COM clients will have a hard time keeping up!
Here's the deal...
It's sortof like specifying absolute vs relative paths to files...
don't lead off with the leading slash -- that means absolute, not
relative!
XmlNodeList MarketNodes = policyNode.SelectNodes(policy-criterion);
or
XmlNodeList MarketNodes = policyNode.SelectNodes(./policy-criterion);
-S
Sounds like Virtual Server will get you what you need...?
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/default.mspx
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
Essential .NET:
... g
-S
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:07:27 -0800, Shawn A. Van Ness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like Virtual Server will get you what you need...?
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/default.mspx
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor
Hi Alex,
I'm not an MVP, but I wrote a little regsvr32 replacement, many moons ago...
http://www.windojitsu.com/tech/reggie.html
HTH... Anyone got any problems with regasm they want fixed? g
-S
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:37:23 -0600, Alex Niblett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember seeing a
What's wrong with an ordinary VS2003 post-build step? Some tips:
1) use the $(DevEnvDir) parameter to avoid hardcoding a path to vsvars32.bat;
2) use the 'call' command to reference that batch file -- recognizing
that everything you type into that post-build event window is going to
get
Thanks for all the extra data points, guys.
I'm seeing blog entries like this, which strongly imply MSBuild won't
target v1.1 (let alone v1.0) out of the box...
http://blogs.msdn.com/jomo_fisher/archive/2004/10/01/236879.aspx
But even Robert McLaws' extension of this work doesn't get into the
Sure enough, as I've been racking my brain over this, a new build of
NAnt (0.85 RC1) has been released. And the solution task doesn't
crash on me the way it did in 0.84...
I will give this a try, and report back when I do some clean-box
testing on a machine with v1.0 only.
Nope, it's just
The vs.net project converter seems to do that though. Perhaps
you can use that one (I mentioned the url in my email).
Yep, apparently it does! Thanks for that tip, Frans.
IMHO this is the scariest google search I've ever seen. (Click at
your own risk... ;-)
Visual Studio .NET doesn't support the ability to build against any
version of the framework other than the one it simul-shipped with.
(Don't talk to me about the supported runtimes project property --
that option doesn't exist at all for library assemblies -- it's just
an app.config hack, and
Sure enough, as I've been racking my brain over this, a new build of
NAnt (0.85 RC1) has been released. And the solution task doesn't
crash on me the way it did in 0.84...
I will give this a try, and report back when I do some clean-box
testing on a machine with v1.0 only.
-S
On Tue, 30 Nov
question with patience
Happy thakns giving, everyone
Regards,
Girish Jain
From: Shawn A. Van Ness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Methods Calls on value types
Date: Thu, 25 Nov
forgot the very basic thing - to
ask my specific question.
My question was (It may sound dumb!) :
Why the value type instance was not boxed in the supplied code ?
Regards,
Girish Jain
- Original Message -
From: Shawn A. Van Ness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
IL_0002: ldloca.s V_0 // Load local variable address on to
the stack
Sounds like you understand, just fine. The CPU pushes the address of
the valuetype onto the stack, before making the function call. That's
a pointer, on the stack, *to* something else on the stack (but
I do not use VB and somewhat missed the fact that it does not
directly support unsigned types
Although you may have painted yourself into a corner with your current
project (if you've already shipped it) adding the [CLSCompliant(true)]
attribute to your library assemblies, in the future, will
D'oh! Sorry, I missed that this was MC++. Too bad, that language
probably needs the guidance of CLSCompliant(true) more than any
other...
-S
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:47:26 +0100, Marek Malowidzki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not use VB and somewhat missed the fact that it does not
uint a = 10;
uint b = 11;
uint c = a - b; // whoops
You must switch c to a signed int, to get the right result. In this
example its easy to see, but IRL coding the above might not be that
I don't get it. On my system, both int and uint produce c == 0x.
There are no separate
I advise people to give up bending their business object models to
work with XmlSerializer. The constraints are pretty heavy...
http://www.windojitsu.com/blog/zenandtheartofxmlserializer.html
In addition to the need for public default ctors and public visibility
on all serializable fields,
D'oh! Good catch, Marek.
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
Essential .NET: building applications and components with C#
November 29 - December 3, in Los Angeles
if (parameters[0].ParameterType == typeof(System.Xml.XmlNode))
-S
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:34:11 -0400, Jekke Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking along those lines. If that's the case, how would I
check for whether or not the Type returned represents XmlNode?
--Jekke
This post is indeed OT, but worst of all, I can't even tell if it's a
web or winforms question... g
If the latter -- consider authoring a custom control with better
usability than what clusters of stock controls can offer. If the
former -- well, this is why everyone hates using HTML-based app
If the XML is very large, converting it to a string (by way of a UTF8
byte array) will involve a couple of large memcpy operations -- or
worse.
In the general case, I think it would be better to rewind the
MemoryStream and use XmlTextReader...
-S
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:08:03 -0600, Steve
Authenticode?
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
Essential .NET: building applications and components with CSharp
August 30 - September 3, in Los Angeles
Why not simply build your VB6 control w/ binary compat? This is not a .NET
problem -- it's what folks had to do to make VB6 controls work with
ordinary COM clients.
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be
Hi Larry,
Firstly: there's a fairly active Tablet dev newsgroup [1] where you might
want to cross-post this question.
But I think you'll find that most of us there will agree w/ people here, in
that you want one big canvas. *Especially* if your aim is to attach
InkCollector or InkOverlay
Last year, I undertook a tour of various IPC methods available to .NET apps,
in this article:
http://www.wd-mag.com/documents/win0312a/
The short of it is this: the TCP remoting channel is just awful for IPC.
The problem is not the massive overhead, but the huge security hole it would
open in
Wow, thanks for the responses everyone. (Especially Jekke, for the line
about decaf.. rotfl!)
I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who's a bit confused... g
I can add a little info to this thread, myself: I installed SP2 from the
ISO cd image, but I already had the v1.0sp2 and v1.1 CLRs on all
Who comprises your target installation base?
I do a lot of research dev for Tablet PC. The improvements to the Tablet
PC experience w/ SP2 are *huge*, definitely not the kind of thing you expect
of a SP, more like a major rev (or two or three).
It would not be out of the question to require
Two simple questions for which I should know the answer, but don't:
Does XP SP2 include the .NET framework? If so, what version(s)? Does it
include any bits from the upcoming .NET service packs [1]?
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/downloads/updates/sptechpreview/
I've heard varying
Reflection.Emit is not perfect, but it's close. It's used to implement the
JScript .NET compiler, if I understand correctly.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-
us/cpref/html/frlrfsystemreflectionemit.asp
http://www.windevnet.com/documents/win0208c/
Advice: search the archives here, and in
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-
us/cpref/html/frlrfsystemreflectionassemblyclassgetmanifestresourcestreamtop
ic1.asp
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
Essential .NET: building
Is this list dead? No post in over a week?
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
Error in line 15 of ADVANCED-DOTNET.MAILTPL: unknown formatting command
- .NET Architecture and Design:
Seriously, keep us posted. If you do indeed find that some innocuous part
of the framework is indeed pumping messages, unbeknownst to the
community... well, that's invaluable information.
Some tips to investigate this:
1) See if you can get a stack trace from the exception, to pinpoint the
I am also interested in this -- it's been a while since I tried, but I
remember having the same problem when I developed my X-Code .NET template
compiler (using JScriptCodeProvider, not CSharp, but hey)... I never got a
good debugging experience w/ CompilerParameters.GenerateInMemory set to
true.
I don't like the idea of writing special-case tools to perform such basic
codegen.
In this old blog article, I show how I use an X-Code .NET template to emit
an AssemblyVersion.cs file based on the current datetime. (Scroll down,
past the rant about version-incrementing. :)
A. Van Ness wrote:
My advice to component vendors of the world: build your dll assemblies
against the earliest version of the runtime you care to support.
Exactly! I have a 1.0 component written in MC++ and I do this too (even
though this is very painful, because the MC++ 1.0 compiler is so
Right, Srihari. If you go back and read the thread from the top (it's very
long, now, you can be forgiven :) you'll see this has been our driving
assumption -- that the JIT compiler would have to do some static analysis
on the call-tree, to ensure that the struct's members are accessed in a
I'm really surprised more folks haven't run into this.
My advice to component vendors of the world: build your dll assemblies
against the earliest version of the runtime you care to support.
Nevermind that VS2k3 does not readily support this -- back-install the v1.0
Fx SDK, and build from the
-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shawn A. Van Ness
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 06:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Visibility of an array type
and the element type
At run-time, there is no such type
This seems like a big waste of time
Arlie, are you concerned more about the time (ie, the memcpy operation) or
excess growth of the stack (eg, in recursive scenarios)? Or both?
I don't have the managed dx sdk handy -- is their Matrix really a valuetype?
In System.Drawing.Drawing2D, it's a
At run-time, there is no such type as SomeClass[]. There is only
System.Array -- and that type is, indeed, public.
System.Array is a special type, in that it has what they call element type
-- meaning that it's a type composed of (or referring to) some other type
(in this case, SomeClass).
Make
them together into one assembly.
I'm uninformed about how system.web.regularexpressions.dll is created.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van
Ness
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:49 PM
To: [EMAIL
Eric,
Do you know if MS has any plans to release a standalone regex compiler
tool, in any upcoming SDK -- to allow us to precompile regexes that we know
will be commonly used in our app...?
(Clearly, some such tool was used to create
System.Web.RegularExpressions.dll. :)
But AFAICT none of the
Or vice versa, host a .NET UserControl in the HTML... (I mention only for
the sake of completeness -- and because I just accidentally replied to the
cross-post on dotnet-winforms... please don't do that, Vince.)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/01/UserCtrl/default.aspx
Just how great
Can't something like this VB.NET code guarantee that there is no
exception raised in a Finally block:
Kinda... but you don't want to silently swallow those exceptions, though.
You might be masking a serious problem -- and you'd never know about it!
The argument we're beating around is this:
Wow, great point, John!
-S
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 22:53:36 +1000, John Elliot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you can't propagate two exceptions
at the same time,
Ironically .NET does offer us a way to propagate multiple exceptions --
the
InnerException property gives each exception the potential,
Huh? Isn't that the idea, Adam -- that 'a' remains null? It would be awful
if 'a' came away from that in some not-null, ambiguous,
partially-constructed state. Right? (That was the problem with C++, which
the original poster alluded to.)
At the IL level, the instantiation of A (newobj) and
Have you tried to [XmlIgnore] the actual DateTime member, and serialize a
string rep instead? This is what a lot of us do anyway, in order to
control the formatting... I believe null string fields aren't serialized,
so it'd be good for that too.
Interesting point Rick, I haven't heard anybody bring this issue up
before. This is turning into a great thread, in general.
Two questions/comments:
(i.e. it does not terminate the finalizer
thread, future finalizations still happen).
I'm not sure this is true for StackOverflowException. I
Exceptions in unmanaged C++ were totally broken, for several reasons...
They are far less broken, in .NET... yes, by all means, throw!
But don't go overboard with them. Throw statements are still rather
expensive, performance-wise.
Cheers,
-Shawn
http://www.windojitsu.com/
-Original
Is it only for that process?
Yes, of course. Else, how else would your computer know what to do with an
incoming TCP/IP connection request for port 8080? Query all the processes
running on the machine to see which are interested? Pick one at random to
handle it? No, of course only one
.NET makes this easier than it's ever been... search for NetworkStream,
TcpClient, and/or TcpListener. Plenty of examples.
Is there something specific we can help you with?
-S
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses
Hi John,
I think either you're over-analyzing this, or the problem is in fact much
bigger than MVC. :)
Let's forget about MVC for a moment, and consider a much more common
scenario: WM_PAINT.
Do the View objects know how to render themselves, without asking anything
of the Document? Probably
of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shawn A. Van
Ness
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Thread with message pump (UI thread)
Jade, I feel your pain. But I think if you really followed it through -- as
you say, starting from
Sure, I don't see why not -- just smuggle the winform thread id to your
unmanaged api somehow, and install a message filter
(Application.AddMessageFilter) on your winforms ui thread, to receive the
postbacks... no big deal.
(Disclaimer: I've never actually tried this; maybe there's some catch in
?)
Or are we stuck with what I would regard as a system that requires the
programmer to write (and - ugh - think about) non-business logic plumbing
code...
Jade Burton
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shawn A. Van
Call Application.Run (or even Application.DoEvents) do establish a message
queue for your secondary thread.
A better answer: You should not be performing any long-blocking operations
on your main UI thread. This rule goes right up there alongside thread
that creates the window services the
= src;
pump.OutboundStream = dst;
pump.Start();
if (wait)
pump.DoneSignal.WaitOne();
return;
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Shawn A. Van Ness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February
Beats me, Pete -- I'm just an idea man. Try it out, and let us know how
you fare...
But if you're worried about its undocumented nature, go ahead and write the
eextra few lines of code to call CorBindToRuntimeEx,
AppDomain.CreateInstance, etc. Same thing, pretty much -- no COM registry
lookups.
I don't know what your immediate problem might be -- even trivial MC++
build problems make my head swim -- but have you considered skipping the
middleman (COM Interop) and simply hosting the CLR in your MFC app,
yourself? It's far, far easier than it sounds. Like, less than a dozen
lines of
Does this thread enlighten?
-S
http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0401DL=DOTNET-
WINFORMSP=R2314
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:37:02 -0500, Bill Bassler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What are the high-level steps/requirements to remote an object that already
inherits from another class?
I used to micromanage my registry, back when it was consuming valueable
space in the paged pool... as of XP, the registry is mapped in chunks, just
like any other file (or database, for that matter).
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=292726
These days, I don't notice regclean-esque
.NET has a pretty straightforward api for role-based security, complete with
somewhat AOPish declarative security checks (by attaching attributes to
classes or methods).
[PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role = Manager)]
public string GetSecretInfo()
{
return The brown fox
Are you guys sure? WaitHandle is a MarshalByRefObject.
Won't the long-running server's attempt to check the state of the event --
via occassional calls to WaitHandle.WaitOne(0) -- effectively be callbacks
to the client appdomain?
-S
===
This list is hosted by
I'll just add that I think a lot of folks *are* doing this... you just don't
see much of this practice in the world of sample code, magazine articles,
etc, because it's just too much extra typing, or extra complexity
distracting from the topic at hand, perhaps.
You do see it, from time to time,
Is this a SQL question, or an ASP question? If the latter, then I'd say
this is a bit of a FAQ. Search for something like this, on dotnet-web:
Response.AddHeader(Content-Disposition,attachment;filename=myfile.doc);
But perhaps I'm misunderstanding what SQL problems you're having...?
Cheers,
'
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van Ness
Sent: 28 November 2003 20:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Transfering large data via remoting
It's interesting to consider why
It's interesting to consider why fragmenting would make your system faster
-- I haven't tried it; I'll take your word for it. At the end of the day,
the same amount of bits are transmitted in either case (actually,
fragmenting will have to transfer more). Could it be all the large-block
heap
I never touched COM+ with any length of pole... the sheer complexity scared
me off. I don't know if that gives me any more credibility than Don, but
I'll pick up his slack and be openly derisive of Remoting too. ;-)
1) There is no safe, robust out-the-box remoting channel appropriate for
IPC.
Hi Stoyan,
This thread is (was? ;) about IPC. Most of the features you and Kamen are
longing for in Indigo aren't quite as relevant for simple IPC...
My advice to the original poster stands: grab a shared-source wrapper for
shared memory, and use that to marshal data back and forth between
Hi Burkhard,
Is my assumption I need a seperate process for the C++ library to
inhibit a potential crash of my .NET client correct?
Yes.
If yes: I'm not sure wether mail slots are the right decision regarding
stability and performance.
Mailslots are not a good option to consider; most
What does this have to do with .NET? I don't mean to be mean, but...
Go to www.google.com, enter logonuser sspi validate credentials and click
the I'm Feeling Lucky button. You'll find an MSKB article with full C code
for doing this, complete with support for downlevel OSes' variances in
If you're averse to XSLT (hard to debug, interop-challenged, unreasonably
difficult to implement procedural logic, etc) you should check out some of
the ASP-style codegen/template languages out there... like Eric Smith's
CodeSmith tool, or my X-Code .NET tool. Both freeware.
.
Crazier things have happened... you never know.
-S
- Original Message -
From: Shawn A. Van Ness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 06:39
Subject: Bug in SaveFileDialog.OverwritePrompt?
.NET v1.1...
When SaveFileDialog.OverwritePrompt is set to true (the default
on IA64.
-S
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:59:30 +0200, Jeroen Frijters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn A. Van Ness wrote:
Another question. Aren't these KEYS provided to you as enum?
I'm needing to p/invoke the actual Win32 functions -- not
using the Microsoft.Win32.RegistryKey stuff.
I seriously doubt
Thanks Mattias -- you make a pretty strong case for option C, but I'm just not sure
I'll feel 100% comfortable until somebody actually calls RegOpenKey on an IA64
machine, for me. ;)
-S
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:59:56 +0200, Mattias =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn,
an assumption...a reasonable one, I think.
So, those are my thoughts.
-akshay
-Original Message-
From: Shawn A. Van Ness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Mensa workout: constructing
magic-value IntPtr arguments
I'm trying to write some custom setup-code to add a few usercontrols to the Toolbox.
Using the automation interface (the EnvDTE stuff), I can create a new ToolboxTab ok,
and I can add text items, but I can't seem to figure out the magic combination of
parameters to add a .NET usercontrol.
is the example you might be looking for [1]...
HTH
scott
[1]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwi
nforms/html/reaworapps1.asp
-Original Message-
From: Shawn A. Van Ness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I feel perhaps I'm not making my #1 complaint clear: if I open up a *well-known* TCP
port, even if it's just on the loopback adapter or whatever, my app will break under
Terminal Services (eg: Remote Desktop, and Fast User Switching).
I'd like for my app to not crash or choke, just because my
Maybe... but I'd prefer a true local-only solution, so that I don't have to endure the
security liability of listening on a network endpoint.
I can't believe .NET is leading so many folks to use TCP for what would be
interprocess comm purposes... scares the heck out of me, quite frankly.
-S
? In the early days of the .NET betas
more than one person wrapped the win32 API to provide managed access.
Regards
Richard Blewett
DevelopMentor
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van
Ness
Sent: 16 January
-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Shawn A. Van Ness
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 22:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Performance: castclass vs. isinst?
Which is faster? For arrays, do both castclass and isinst
Which is faster? For arrays, do both castclass and isinst have to walk the list of
elements, checking each one?
I find I never know when to write
string[] foo =
(string[])arraylist.ToArray(typeof(string)); // castclass
vs
string[] foo =
arraylist.ToArray(typeof(string)) as
The sample project accompanying my NDoc article [1] includes a VC++ makefile project
which copies some files around, post-build, in order to feed NDoc.
[1] http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/user/view/cs_msg/12137
I'm sure you can figure out the VC++ makefile trick yourself, Ben. But if you want a
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shawn A. Van
Ness
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 12:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET]
AppDomain.DoCallback(CrossAppDomainDelegate) bug?
v1.0.3705
v1.0.3705... I just tried sending a delegate, bound to a serializable/mbv instance,
to AppDomain.DoCallback. I was surprised to find that my object was only transmitted
[in] to the secondary appdomain, not [in,out].
Is there no way to return any info from AppDomain.DoCallback (w/o having Foo
What, if anything, does IEExec.exe do differently than this?
static void Main( string[] args)
{
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ExecuteAssembly(args[0]);
}
I played around w/ various CAS and IE zone-settings for a few minutes, and got pretty
much identical results. Am I missing
Using Anakrino on ieexec.exe reveals this:
Thanks Frederic (but I know how to read the ILDASM output just fine :).
What does it all mean?
Is this ~1000 lines goo all for the sake of hooking up DLL controls w/in IE? For the
EXE case (which is what I'm currently interested in -- sorry I
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
