Geoffrey == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Geoffrey I can't say how disappointed I am in this post, and your
Geoffrey behavior in general here. the fact is that this is a
Geoffrey complex issue, for developers and users alike, but all you
Geoffrey have done to help is throw harsh
I *want* modperl to succeed. I *want* modperl2 to succeed.
good :)
I believe
Stas has made two significant errors in this process, however:
1) expecting people to not have modperl1 for a significant time
following the modperl2 release, like everyone would upgrade
tomorrow thus
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Stas == Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stas My submission to /.org made it to the Apache section:
Stas http://apache.slashdot.org/apache/04/12/25/1414211.shtml?tid=145tid=2
Stas It's about asking to help testing the mp2-RCs.
Oh good. Another place to
On Dec 27, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
You mean Apache::TestMB.
Yeah, that ole thing. :-)
I know someone who's name is David who can easily write a patch for
this.
David, it should really be:
ModPerl::MB
and Apache::TestMB should use it. Of course ModPerl::MB doesn't exist
yet.
That
Stas == Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stas My submission to /.org made it to the Apache section:
Stas http://apache.slashdot.org/apache/04/12/25/1414211.shtml?tid=145tid=2
Stas It's about asking to help testing the mp2-RCs.
Oh good. Another place to post my use Apache2 considered
Stas My submission to /.org made it to the Apache section:
Stas
http://apache.slashdot.org/apache/04/12/25/1414211.shtml?
tid=145tid=2
Stas It's about asking to help testing the mp2-RCs.
Oh good. Another place to post my use Apache2 considered harmful
rant...
