Hi ,
Is it possible that somehow the sandbox won't return the ids of changed
objects using CustomerSyncService ?
>From what I see it will never return id's of changed or deleted adgroup
criterions, also no changes to adgroup are returned. Changes to campaigns or
ads are picked up and returned .
Or may be it's a difference in how the resources are allocated between
production and sandbox environment ?
In production environment it takes around ~10sec for changes to propagate to
all your systems so CustomerSyncService can pick them up .
In Sandbox it might take longer, like we are talking
Looks like no one cares about fixing sandbox bugs so I had to debug your
api.
1) I create campaign and add some other objectsusing the api
2) I use CustomerSyncService for the first time with min date set to
19700102 since I don't have the lastChangeTimestamp
3) I get a result with some lastCh
Thanks Eric,
I'm glad someones is going to take a look at it . As I said in my last
message , it's not about criteria changes but about lastChangeTimestamp
being incorrect so it just depends how lucky you are
and how much seconds you subtract , you will get more and more changes be it
criteria
Hi ,
When I'm testing a campaign for conversion optimizer eligibility it works
fine with manualCPC but when it's with BudgetOptimizer it fails with
RequestError.INVALID_INPUT instead of the
usual BiddingError.PAY_PER_CONVERSION_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_CUSTOMER
Should I assume that both errors in this
Actually it's impossible to conisder it as
BiddingError.PAY_PER_CONVERSION_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_CUSTOMER
because it returns only one error for all the campaigns that were sent.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blo
Also it's not 100% case of testing Budget Optimized campaign for ConvOpt
elegibility there is some extra variable that causes the incorrect
response.
I managed to get the correct response
(BiddingTransitionError.BUDGET_OPTIMIZER_IS_ENABLED ) on some other
accounts.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Actually this is the shorter version of the problem with one campaign only :
*** Outgoing SOAP **
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schem
that optimized
and the processing time rises exponentially actually even 100 entires
was a bit slow and we just changed to the older SOAPPY because it's MUCH
faster.
Hope it helps.
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog a
y
this is Boost Ads campaign , don't touch it !" somewhere in the stats ? May
be some campaign naming pattern (Places Ads_58675c625a9845dc_1)?
It would be very annoying to test every downloaded campaign if it's
mutable.
Thanks
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Thanks , I will definitely use it when we move to the newer api !
Alexander Parij.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
he
search queries in Keyword Panel I just see the totals not the individual
queries. I guess it's something to do with data reporting and not the
reports api per se .
Alexander Parij.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discuss
Hi ,
We are also downloading Ad(Creative) Performance daily reports and they are
just fine, they contain yesterday's data.
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
example a report with this
id : 49412363
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received th
port Id is 61819852
Thanks
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message becau
Nvm , I got it.
Just removing network predicate will give me the zero impression keywords.
Not sure why it's related but this type of knowledge should be documented
because the new api is a bit unintuitive .
Thanks!
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
e some fail message
Thank you.
Alexander Parij
The sample operation:
operations = [{
'operator' : 'SET' ,
'operand' : {
'id':#CMP_ID,
Can anyone investigate this problem ?
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this
Hi ,
I'm also having problems with keywords report not downloading content
network. Until couple days ago it was working fine. I haven't change my code
so the problem is with the api.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwo
Happens to us as well
Alexander Parij.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because
xactly the same response with the same error message , no ?
Anyways your suggested example really helped and it's a better solution !
thanks .
Just for future this bug is still relevant and might be encountered by
people who are trying to do something el
ports, but I don't really care about these stats. I just want to
get
keywords on content network. Is that because they don't have performance
stats and they don't belong to the new reports unlike the old structure
reports?
Thanks.
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
This “keywordId” is wrong ! When you download ad report trying to get the
content keywords you get the ids of managed placements.
Or they need to fix the API or improve documentation.
I will open a separate question regarding the issue.
Alex Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Well I figured it out.
Setting no stats fields and no network fields will give the content network
keywords in keywords reports just later I need to figure out which keyword
belongs to what network.
Such a simple task but a convoluted solution.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
')
for non eligible campaigns
but when the campaign has ended we are getting very generic error
of RequestError.INVALID_INPUT
Not sure how it changed in future versions of the api . but it would be nice
to have more helpful message.
Thank you.
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
, not sure what.
Can you explain RequestError.INVALID_INPUT for this request id
41d09b725620f441bc06d85072af1e63
Thank you.
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/
n api mutate calls or include the
usage of adwords.google.com ? Can CustomeSyncService pick online changes ?
I would really appreciate if you check these accounts.
Thanks .
Alexander parij.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
Hi Eric,
It sort of works but I can't say it works correctly. Looks like adgroups
and other entities are fine except extensions.
I'm getting the weird 'deleted' extension in the addedExtensions field.
Thanks.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and dis
Hi Eric
Can you explain to me why this address is invalid geolocation or any address
in UK? :
'streetAddress' :17 Rectory Terrace ,
'streetAddress2' : '' ,
'cityName' : Cambridge,
'provin
B 2EL
England, GB
I hope you don't reject this address based on the rivalry between the two
companies...
Alexander Parij.
Thanks.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google
Hello ,
We are getting AdWordsGoogleInternalError:
[InternalApiError.UNEXPECTED_INTERNAL_API_ERROR @
com.google.ads.api.services.common.error.InternalApiError.(InternalApiErro]
from the sandbox
when trying to use CampaignService across multiple test account .
Alexander Parij
Hi ,
Around 1:15 pm ET I started to get these errors. Just before it was working
fine.
AdWordsGoogleInternalError: [InternalApiError.UNEXPECTED_INTERNAL_API_ERROR
@
com.google.ads.api.services.common.error.InternalApiError.(InternalApiErro]
Thank you
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
return an empty list in 'accounts' but since today it's
returns nothing.
Thank you
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/gr
Hi
We have a client with googlemail.com adwords account .
When we are getting auth tokens or use GetServicedAccountService v201101 it
works fine but when we continue and call AccountService.GetAccountInfo()
v13 with the same credentials we get an error
*AdWordsRequestError: Login with this use
would request id 0004b05ecfcf5ef80a1487cb6f3c be enough ?
Thanks.
Alexander Parij
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
Looks like the problem is fixed and you return the usual
{'accounts': [{'canManageClients': 'false', 'customerId': '-1'}]}
for non-MCC accounts
Thanks.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups
Hi ,
we are getting the same error with v201101 ServicedAccountService , since
yesterday as well.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
looks like they fixed it
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because you are subscri
I suspect there was a server update yesterday related to dev_token headers :
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com/2011/11/update2-developer-token-required-in.html
Most likely something else got broken during this update. Anyways a quick
fix would be a retry mechanism, it works for us
Alex
--
=~=~=
Yes , if before it could be solved by just re-trying now it's all gone
nothing works at all.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
It's definitely developerToken related and they mention in this blog post
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com/2011/11/action-required-developer-token.html
"If your application fails to provide the developer token as an HTTP header
after November 23rd,
it will receive the error message QuotaCheckErr
Eric, I'm using python library 14.2.3
*** Outgoing SOAP **
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:ZSI="http://www.zolera.com/schemas/ZSI/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/20
Eric as you can see in the outgoing soap
I do send developerToken with v14
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
same situation , in ReportDefiniationService.py
def __GenerateHeaders(self, return_micros):
add
headers['developerToken'] = 'YOUR TOKEN'
and also patch the SanityCheck so it won't complain about the extra field.
It's a quick hack to those who have production
Hi ,
I'm using v201101 for reports, since today all reports return zero
impression rows.
We have this code running for many months... it's breaking production
systems.
Alex.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.bl
Kevin ,
Any chance that something else was broken in how the reports handle zero
impression rows while fixing this bug ?
Alex.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adword
Adding "impressions>0" predicate fixed the issue.
Thanks Kevin.
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You receiv
47 matches
Mail list logo