Re: [AFMUG] DDOS

2023-03-21 Thread Cassidy B. Larson
odels we get are in the low 5 figures for each one. > -Adam > > From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf > Of TJ Trout > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 3:08 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DDOS &

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS

2023-03-21 Thread dmmoffett
Well that’s a better deal than A10. I don’t write the checks, but I think the A10 models we get are in the low 5 figures for each one. -Adam From: AF On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 3:08 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DDOS And anyone

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS

2023-03-21 Thread TJ Trout
And anyone not running automated mitigation, I would highly recommend Mke solutions, he charges only a few hundred dollars to get you up and running, just provide a VM or hardware. On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 12:05 PM TJ Trout wrote: > Nice, fastnetmon or something else? > > If your running

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-21 Thread Josh Luthman
RTBH and change the CGNAT config. Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:47 PM Matt Hoppes < mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > That's what I've done... stops it in about 1 minute, but at the

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-21 Thread Zach Underwood
; > -- > *From: *"Zach Underwood" > *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" > *Sent: *Wednesday, January 20, 2021 8:23:43 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat > > Remote ddos protection has a few points. The below applies to

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-21 Thread Mike Hammett
s Group" Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 8:23:43 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat Remote ddos protection has a few points. The below applies to ddos protection that can not normally be in the traffic flow. 1. It can break ipsec tunnels that where setup prior to the mitigation. We stay

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Zach Underwood
Remote ddos protection has a few points. The below applies to ddos protection that can not normally be in the traffic flow. 1. It can break ipsec tunnels that where setup prior to the mitigation. We stay this alot at arbor, it is do to when the ipsec tunnel comes up the mtu becomes fixed. When you

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread TJ Trout
You can get psychz gre tunnel + bgp and announce the whole /24 out the tunnel and stop anounce on regular transit. This acts like another dia + scrubbing over your existing transit via gre On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 5:50 PM Dev wrote: > If you do BGP you can send it to a black hole, otherwise if

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Dev
If you do BGP you can send it to a black hole, otherwise if the link is truly saturated and unusable, you’ll probably be talking upstream to someone who can help. Later you can buy proxy scrubbing services or get an Arbor box, but that probably doesn’t help you now. > On Jan 20, 2021, at 3:55

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Matt Hoppes
That's what I've done... stops it in about 1 minute, but at the expense of traffic flowing. On 1/20/21 8:36 PM, Zach Underwood wrote: In that case you really only have one option announce a black hole to your upstreams and complete the ddos attack. On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 8:20 PM Matt Hoppes

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Zach Underwood
In that case you really only have one option announce a black hole to your upstreams and complete the ddos attack. On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 8:20 PM Matt Hoppes wrote: > In this case they overwhelmed our circuit... and it was destined to the > CGNAT box NAT IP. > > On 1/20/21 7:39 PM, Zach

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Matt Hoppes
In this case they overwhelmed our circuit... and it was destined to the CGNAT box NAT IP. On 1/20/21 7:39 PM, Zach Underwood wrote: If you have enough to bring the good and attack traffic into your network the arbor boxes can filter out all of the attack traffic allow the ip and it's traffic

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Zach Underwood
If you have enough to bring the good and attack traffic into your network the arbor boxes can filter out all of the attack traffic allow the ip and it's traffic to stay online. On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 7:28 PM Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > What does that do? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 20,

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Chuck McCown via AF
What does that do? Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 20, 2021, at 5:04 PM, Zach Underwood wrote: > >  > If you have bandwidth send all of the traffic into an arbor box. I have seen > them do some amazing things. > > > > Disclaimer I use to for work for arbor/netscout but I am no longer there.

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Zach Underwood
If you have bandwidth send all of the traffic into an arbor box. I have seen them do some amazing things. Disclaimer I use to for work for arbor/netscout but I am no longer there. On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 6:56 PM Matt Hoppes wrote: > Any ideas how to mitigate DDOS attacks when you’re on CGNAT

Re: [AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread TJ Trout
null/rtbh and move the nat exit ip, then break down that pool to 25:1 and wait for the second wave to further isolate On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:56 PM Matt Hoppes < mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > Any ideas how to mitigate DDOS attacks when you’re on CGNAT with maybe 100 > people

[AFMUG] DDOS on cgnat

2021-01-20 Thread Matt Hoppes
Any ideas how to mitigate DDOS attacks when you’re on CGNAT with maybe 100 people behind one IP concentrator? -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com