Interesting,
A click through from the above link to the original article :
https://www.ericsson.com/ne/en/press-releases/2019/1/deutsche-telekom-and-ericsson-achieve-fiber-like-results-with-wireless-backhaul
says:
"The round-trip latency performance of the link tested was less than 100
It's likely using most, if not all, of the 70/80ghz band to do that. I
think the 10Gbps radios all use 2000mhz wide channels.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:34 AM Adam Moffett wrote:
> .and is it spectrally efficient? There are hundreds of mhz that count
> as "5ghz".
>
>
> On 1/14/2019 11:29
.and is it spectrally efficient? There are hundreds of mhz that
count as "5ghz".
On 1/14/2019 11:29 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Could be a typo... maybe it was supposed to be 1ms. Or it's just
stupidly written... afterall, 0.001ms is less than 100ms. If "5G's
goals" are less than 100ms,
Could be a typo... maybe it was supposed to be 1ms. Or it's just stupidly
written... afterall, 0.001ms is less than 100ms. If "5G's goals" are less
than 100ms, than it meets that.
40Gbps doesn't seem particularly impressive to me anyway... that's been
possible for awhile with e-band radios. I
Must be a typo... maybe 100 us ?
On 1/14/19, 10:13 AM, "AF on behalf of Chuck McCown" wrote:
They send each packet 100 times and vote on the most likely values.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 14, 2019, at 6:15 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
>
They send each packet 100 times and vote on the most likely values.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 14, 2019, at 6:15 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
> Maybe they meant 100 microseconds?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: AF On Behalf Of Robert
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 11:01 PM
> To:
Maybe they meant 100 microseconds?
-Original Message-
From: AF On Behalf Of Robert
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 11:01 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ericsson and Deutsche Telekom have developed a wireless
40 Gbps backhaul for 5G - TechSpot
1.8 miles with "less than 100ms"
1.8 miles with "less than 100ms" of latency? Um U.. Is
that 99ms of extra latency so the data can be copied somewhere else for
monitoring?
On 1/13/19 4:07 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
