Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-20 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 1:56:13 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy > For those who've never ordered such circuits (pretty obvious you and I have, > some others have not) I g

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-20 Thread Eric Kuhnke
For those who've never ordered such circuits (pretty obvious you and I have, some others have not) I guess what I'm trying to say is that 99% of the time "a wave" from a carrier means they want to interface with you with some standard non-WDM optic, like 1310nm LX or 1550nm within a building. The

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-20 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 12/20/17 09:59, Eric Kuhnke wrote: You write as if a major carrier lets just anybody run an alien wave adjacent to all their other customers' circuits on two strands of fiber...  Which is actually really rare. You need to have a high level of trust and confidence in the abilities of the

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-20 Thread Eric Kuhnke
You write as if a major carrier lets just anybody run an alien wave adjacent to all their other customers' circuits on two strands of fiber... Which is actually really rare. You need to have a high level of trust and confidence in the abilities of the optical engineering on both sides. It is true

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-20 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 12/19/17 10:00 AM, Carl Peterson wrote: We are about to sign a contract on a 10G wave and I'm trying to figure out what the wan phys should be and whats the difference. I'm assuming we would want lan phys. Does this make sense and would we just use normal 10G optics on each end? If

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
egards. >> Faisal Imtiaz >> Snappy Internet & Telecom >> http://www.snappytelecom.net >> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net >>> From: "Carl Peterson" < cpeter...@portnetworks.com >

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Joe Novak
very likely 10g Lit circuit.. (many carriers use the term Wave to >>>> differentiate between Ethernet / MPLS circuits). >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> >>>> Faisal Imtiaz >>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>>> http://www.snappytel

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Carl Peterson
circuits). >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Faisal Imtiaz >>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>> http://www.snappytelecom.net >>> >>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518> >>> >>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 &

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Eric Kuhnke
;(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email: >> supp...@snappytelecom.net >> >> -- >> >> *From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 19, 2017 1:00:54 PM >> *S

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Carl Peterson
8> > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email: > supp...@snappytelecom.net > > -- > > *From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom http://www.snappytelecom.net Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 1:00:54 PM &g

Re: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Adam Moffett
I bet you'll need WDM optics, of whatever color they tell you. -- Original Message -- From: "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: 12/19/2017 1:00:54 PM Subject: [AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy We are about to sign a contract on a

[AFMUG] 10g wave lan phy vs 10g wan phy

2017-12-19 Thread Carl Peterson
We are about to sign a contract on a 10G wave and I'm trying to figure out what the wan phys should be and whats the difference. I'm assuming we would want lan phys. Does this make sense and would we just use normal 10G optics on each end? -- Carl Peterson *PORT NETWORKS* 401 E Pratt St,