Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-27 Thread Ben Royer
MTI and SuperPass Antennas. Thank you, Ben Royer, Operations Manager Royell Communications, Inc. 217-965-3699 www.royell.net From: Paul McCall Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options What has been found

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-27 Thread Super WISP
lto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the connectorized 3.65 SMs? Paul, PDMNet This message is i

[AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Paul McCall
What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the connectorized 3.65 SMs? Paul, PDMNet

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Ken Hohhof
I’ve used this panel: https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=578935 $220 From: Paul McCall Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options What has been found as a successful option for attaching

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Ken Hohhof
] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options I put my house on 3.6 450. SM+reflector 40' up my tower. One very large maple tree about 100 feet away directly in the path. The AP is almost exactly a mile away at 230 feet on a regular Cambium "90" degree sector. I have about -57d

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Adam Moffett
I've used the WB 25dbi dish with wimax SU's. I got 10db better than the 14.5 dbi integrated so it worked as advertised. Sorry I don't have a direct answer as far as the 450. What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the connectorized 3.65 SMs? Paul, PDMNet

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Adam Moffett
Sean, You have the Compact wimax right? I'm curious how you'd rate that side by side with the PMP450 in 3.65. Cambium sales said the Compact would give you better NLOS, but where the 450 connected it would be faster. Would you say that was accurate? Thanks, Adam Nothing really. We

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Sean Heskett
avascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pa...@pdmnet.net');> > *Sent:* Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options > > What has been found as a successful option f

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Ken Hohhof
Cambium was promising to make the pigtails longer, not sure when that will happen, and how long it will take to flush out old stock. From: Sean Heskett Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options Nothing really

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Sean Heskett
We have telrad lte on a few towers, and we did a side by side comparison with telrad and canopy. Cambium 450 3.65ghz can go thru a tree or two at close range (less than 1 mile). But it only modulates at 1x mimo-a Telrad lte is able to blast thru a thicket of trees no problem. We've been

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Sean Heskett
Nothing really. We tried a few and found either a bare SM or SM+dish was the best solution. Everything else was a PITA because the pig tails that come with the SM are too short, so you either need to do surgery and replace the cables or put the SM in an odd location/orientation to get it

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Jon Langeler
ITElite for slant panels are decent if you want to mount on tall poles. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 25, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Paul McCall wrote: > > What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the connectorized > 3.65 SMs? > > Paul, PDMNet

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Patrick Leary
ctober 25, 2015 12:22 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options I put my house on 3.6 450. SM+reflector 40' up my tower. One very large maple tree about 100 feet away directly in the path. The AP is almost exactly a mile

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options

2015-10-25 Thread Ken Hohhof
@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options It doesn’t mean “NLOS” inherently. It’s all about the gear that enables NLOS, as Sean just mentioned. Patrick Leary, Telrad 727-501-3735 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent