MTI and SuperPass Antennas.
Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net
From: Paul McCall
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
What has been found
lto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the connectorized
3.65 SMs?
Paul, PDMNet
This message is i
What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the connectorized
3.65 SMs?
Paul, PDMNet
I’ve used this panel:
https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=578935
$220
From: Paul McCall
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
What has been found as a successful option for attaching
] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
I put my house on 3.6 450. SM+reflector 40' up my tower. One very large maple
tree about 100 feet away directly in the path. The AP is almost exactly a mile
away at 230 feet on a regular Cambium "90" degree sector. I have about -57d
I've used the WB 25dbi dish with wimax SU's. I got 10db better than the
14.5 dbi integrated so it worked as advertised. Sorry I don't have a
direct answer as far as the 450.
What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the
connectorized 3.65 SMs?
Paul, PDMNet
Sean,
You have the Compact wimax right? I'm curious how you'd rate that side
by side with the PMP450 in 3.65.
Cambium sales said the Compact would give you better NLOS, but where the
450 connected it would be faster. Would you say that was accurate?
Thanks,
Adam
Nothing really. We
avascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pa...@pdmnet.net');>
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:27 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
>
> What has been found as a successful option f
Cambium was promising to make the pigtails longer, not sure when that will
happen, and how long it will take to flush out old stock.
From: Sean Heskett
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 10:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
Nothing really
We have telrad lte on a few towers, and we did a side by side comparison
with telrad and canopy.
Cambium 450 3.65ghz can go thru a tree or two at close range (less than 1
mile). But it only modulates at 1x mimo-a
Telrad lte is able to blast thru a thicket of trees no problem.
We've been
Nothing really. We tried a few and found either a bare SM or SM+dish was
the best solution. Everything else was a PITA because the pig tails that
come with the SM are too short, so you either need to do surgery and
replace the cables or put the SM in an odd location/orientation to get it
ITElite for slant panels are decent if you want to mount on tall poles.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Paul McCall wrote:
>
> What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the connectorized
> 3.65 SMs?
>
> Paul, PDMNet
ctober 25, 2015 12:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
I put my house on 3.6 450. SM+reflector 40' up my tower. One very large maple
tree about 100 feet away directly in the path. The AP is almost exactly a mile
@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450SM 3.65 connectorized antenna options
It doesn’t mean “NLOS” inherently. It’s all about the gear that enables NLOS,
as Sean just mentioned.
Patrick Leary, Telrad
727-501-3735
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent
14 matches
Mail list logo