Paul
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+paulm=pdmnet@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
via Af
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 12:13 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] missing part on Canopy SM
Could be, but it looks like it was cleanly desoldered. Seeing up close is not
one of my
It's a Transient Voltage Suppressor. I haven't tested others, but I know
100 will function just fine without it. In a pinch I remove them to fix
ethernet errors. I think this is the right part number if you wanted to
replace it. RCLAMP0504FCT
Gerard
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Ken Hohhof
oops, 100 series
Gerard
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Gerard Dupont III ger...@shelbybb.com
wrote:
It's a Transient Voltage Suppressor. I haven't tested others, but I know
100 will function just fine without it. In a pinch I remove them to fix
ethernet errors. I think this is the right
, September 27, 2014 10:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] missing part on Canopy SM
It's a Transient Voltage Suppressor. I haven't tested others, but I know 100
will function just fine without it. In a pinch I remove them to fix ethernet
errors. I think this is the right part number if you
Could be that when the part came off, a trace went with it
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+paulm=pdmnet@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
via Af
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 11:07 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] missing part on Canopy SM
So the missing part doesn’t explain why
into it
at 192.168.1.1 which is strange because it was supposed to be defaulted, NAT
was enabled.
Strange.
From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 10:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] missing part on Canopy SM
Could be that when the part came off, a trace went
