@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] reusing vlan IDs
On a MT?
AFAIK, the VLANs on one port are not connected to the VLANs on another
port. In other words, each VLAN is like a new port.
You could then bridge ether1-VLANxyz to ether2-VLANxyz if you were so
inclined.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 12:28:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] reusing vlan IDs
yes MT
For the most part I couldnt see a time I would want to bridge the ports.
Just something simple like saying VLAN ID 255 is reserved on the network for
the router
Will I break the internet of things of I reuse the same vlan ID on multiple
ports
This is solely for simplified deployment of site routers since it turns out
I need my OSPF subnets on vlans so I dont have to keep track of a billion
vlan IDs as well as a billion /30s
The ports would not be
On a MT?
AFAIK, the VLANs on one port are not connected to the VLANs on another
port. In other words, each VLAN is like a new port.
You could then bridge ether1-VLANxyz to ether2-VLANxyz if you were so
inclined.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 7/6/2015 9:12 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] reusing vlan IDs
On a MT?
AFAIK, the VLANs on one port are not connected to the VLANs on another port. In
other words, each VLAN is like a new port.
You could then bridge ether1-VLANxyz to ether2-VLANxyz if you were so inclined.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 7/6
