22.93 is too low. Cambium says 23V is the minimum into the radio. See
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-Installation/ePMP-PoE-Powering-Primer/td-p/49944
You need to subtract a bit of loss inside the injector, and then a bit more
for cabling. Plus a bit more for everything else.
Fo
Agreed. I expect your issues will go away if you increase voltage. We run
all ePMP @ 48VDC. It fixed these random rebooting issues for us.
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
> 22.93 is too low. Cambium says 23V is the minimum into
Anybody know if an 11GHz PTP800 ODU will mate with a Trango dish? I know
the PTP800 ODUs are Remec rectangular, but the Trango dish is Remec
circular. But aren't the physical interface dimensions the same? The
Trango dish is just a round hole, so no plate to rotate to change polarity.
Got a de
If you butt a rectangular waveguide to a circular waveguide will have some
return loss mismatch issues.
It would work to a certain extent but you will not have as much tx power as
you should and you will have RX loss.
Yes, everything else is the same. I would give it a try. It will probably
I guess I just don't know enough about the slight differences since I've
never seen a PTP800 ODU interface. But that's exactly what a Trango ODU
(just Remec OEM) does. The port on the ODU is rectangular and mates up
directly with the circular port on the dish. Is there a gap or something
for ma
No, you have to convert rectangular to square and then square to circular to
do a rectangular to circular transition.
If the nose of the dish had a rectangular hole, then it would mate right up
without problems.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2f7/23c37af9951dfa018248f24e586323556ee1.pdf
htt
OSPF question:
A—-B—-C
And
A——C
A is the Internet peering router.
C should end up with two default routes in it correct?
One through B and one directly to C?
What’s odd is everything on A populated on Cs route table as direct routes -
except for the default route.
How many default routes show up in the LSA table?
On 5/13/2018 3:51 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
OSPF question:
A—-B—-C
And
A——C
A is the Internet peering router.
C should end up with two default routes in it correct?
One through B and one directly to C?
What’s odd is everything on A popu
Only one - the Long one.
The things connected to A take the direct path but the default is not coming
through for some reason.
> On May 13, 2018, at 17:12, George Skorup wrote:
>
> How many default routes show up in the LSA table?
>
>> On 5/13/2018 3:51 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> OSPF questi
What are your path costs?
On Sun, May 13, 2018, 4:15 PM Matt Hoppes
wrote:
> Only one - the Long one.
>
> The things connected to A take the direct path but the default is not
> coming through for some reason.
>
> On May 13, 2018, at 17:12, George Skorup wrote:
>
> How many default routes show
Identical. Shouldn’t they both still show up on the routing table?
> On May 13, 2018, at 17:17, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> What are your path costs?
>
>> On Sun, May 13, 2018, 4:15 PM Matt Hoppes
>> wrote:
>> Only one - the Long one.
>>
>> The things connected to A take the direct path but th
OK, so only A is distributing the default route. as-type-1 or as-type-2?
E1 takes path costs into account. E2 does not.
Bounce a neighbor and see if it fixes itself. I assume RouterOS. I've
seen weird stuff like this happen before.
On 5/13/2018 4:15 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Only one - the Long
Correct. A is distributing default route. Directly to C (in theory but not
happening) and to B which is distributing to C currently.
This is edgeOS.
I’m actually not sure. I’ll have to check on E1 vs E2.
> On May 13, 2018, at 17:26, George Skorup wrote:
>
> OK, so only A is distributing th
O. They are all going out as Metric-type 2
> On May 13, 2018, at 17:37, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> Correct. A is distributing default route. Directly to C (in theory but not
> happening) and to B which is distributing to C currently.
>
> This is edgeOS.
>
> I’m actually not sure. I’ll ha
So why is type 2 the default on most routers? For what reason would you use an
E2 over an E1?
> On May 13, 2018, at 17:40, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> O. They are all going out as Metric-type 2
>
>> On May 13, 2018, at 17:37, Matt Hoppes
>> wrote:
>>
>> Correct. A is distributing default
The OSPF state machine always prefers an E1 route over an E2 route.
There's more stuff like multiple areas and ABRs, ASBRs and all that
which I don't really care about for a couple dozen routers and a single
AS. But I've always used E1 for the default route. Don't ask me why.
Mostly because I d
Hi all,
It’s been a while since I’ve posted. Wondering who has used the Mimosa 24Ghz
product in a heavy rain zone. What is your max distance? I really wish Cambium
had a 24Ghz option!
Cheers,
Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://silo.ca
Wireless | Fibre | VoI
The ITU charts give a good bit of information - depending on what your
uptime rrquiments are, 24ghz is likely 2-3 miles.
On May 13, 2018 8:20 PM, "Andreas Wiatowski" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> It’s been a while since I’ve posted. Wondering who has used the Mimosa
> 24Ghz product in a heavy rain zo
Max is 2-ish Miles.
SAF has freemile and integra 24ghz radios too
-Sean
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 7:20 PM Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> It’s been a while since I’ve posted. Wondering who has used the Mimosa
> 24Ghz product in a heavy rain zone. What is your max distance? I really
We don't plan on 24Ghz being reliable much past 1 mile here. If we use it
further than that it's because it's a back up or we have a back up for
it.those that say you can use it in the 3-6 mile range reliably either live
in the desert or don't know what they are talking about :)
On Sun, May 13, 20
I wouldn't trust more than a mile and a half here.
On Sun, May 13, 2018, 9:10 PM Adair Winter
wrote:
> We don't plan on 24Ghz being reliable much past 1 mile here. If we use it
> further than that it's because it's a back up or we have a back up for
> it.those that say you can use it in the 3-6
That's odd, everything I ever touched is default type 1.
On Sun, May 13, 2018, 5:18 PM George Skorup
wrote:
> The OSPF state machine always prefers an E1 route over an E2 route.
> There's more stuff like multiple areas and ABRs, ASBRs and all that which I
> don't really care about for a couple d
The ITU rain zone stuff is old news. I've posted a better way to find your link
failure point a few times.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Stanners"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: S
23 matches
Mail list logo
