Re: [AFMUG] SAF Hybrid interface question

2014-12-01 Thread RanchBoss via Af
Yes

Sent from my Ranch Phone

On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 We have an SAF Lumina with the Hybrid Interface on it.  Optical and 
 Electrcial.  Our fiber going to the radio got eaten by a big bird.  Not THE 
 Big Bird, but A big bird J
  
 Anyway, can we actually use the EL (copper) interface to pass data?  I have 
 emailed SAF this AM and not gotten an answer yet
  
 Paul
  
 Paul McCall, Pres.
 PDMNet / Florida Broadband
 658 Old Dixie Highway
 Vero Beach, FL 32962
 772-564-6800 office
 772-473-0352 cell
 www.pdmnet.com
 pa...@pdmnet.net
  


Re: [AFMUG] Dymo label printers

2014-11-25 Thread RanchBoss via Af
I fold them on half, longways, so that the split in the rear opens up. I have 
used one for several years and never defaced a label. Once I a while one is 
difficult, but the backing does come off even then.

Allen

Sent from my Ranch Phone

On Nov 25, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Randy Cosby via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Does anyone use the Dymo Rhino label printers?  I got one and love it -- 
 except for trying to peel the backing off labels.  It's a real pain and I end 
 up ruining quite a few by stretching them or getting adhesive on my fingers 
 then on the front of the label.   Any tricks I haven't figured out?
 -- 
 
 mime-attachment.png Randy Cosby
 InfoWest, Inc
 435-674-0165 x 2010
 infowest.com
 
 This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc 
 and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
 contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information.  
 
 Unauthorized use, distribution, review or disclosure is 
 prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
 contact rco...@infowest.com by reply email and destroy 
 the original message, all attachments and copies.
 


Re: [AFMUG] 13.2 Issue (Removing frequency checkboxes)

2014-11-14 Thread RanchBoss via Af
I upgraded a 2.4 sector SM first to 13.2 and it did not reconnect to the tower 
until I upgraded the AP to 13.2 as well.

Allen

Sent from my Ranch Phone

On Nov 14, 2014, at 12:25 AM, Rajesh Vijayakumar via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 We looked at all the recent changes than went in to 13.2 but did not find 
 anything that would explain this behavior. Also tried to recreate it in the 
 lab on a 2.4 GHz setup, but the SM kept all the checked frequencies after 
 upgrade from 13.1.3 to 13.2.
 
 Has anyone else upgraded a 2.4 GHz sector and run into this issue (or did not 
 run into this issue)? 
 
 Rajesh Vijayakumar
 Cambium Networks
 
 
 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
 We are investigating the other issues, but with respect to 5767.5 and 
 5807.5, those two were affected by a bug fix, in that pre-13.2, 5767.5 was 
 actually enabling 5767.20, due to an obvious typo in the scan list code, and 
 5807.5 was actually enabling 5807.00, due to another typo bug in the code. 
 So correcting these two items may have left them unchecked on an upgrade to 
 13.2, but they weren’t valid scan frequencies anyways.
 
  
 
 These two updates didn’t make the release notes due to an oversight.  These 
 two frequency updates are in no way related to what is being reported for 
 the 2.5MHz center channels coming back unchecked for 2.4.  we are 
 investigating.
 
  
 
 -Aaron
 
  
 
 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber 
 Broadcasting) via Af
 Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:25 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 13.2 Issue (Removing frequency checkboxes)
 
  
 
 13.2 on the SM definitely does not jive with build 32 on the AP. So.. don't 
 do that. I forgot I still had that AP on build 32 until it was too late. SMs 
 would pop in session for about 2 seconds and go down again. Luckily updating 
 the AP to 13.2 official fixed it.
 
 I'm also seeing 5GHz SMs losing freqs. But it's funny, like 99% of them only 
 lose 5767.5 and 5807.5. I try to avoid the 2.5 centers whenever I can since 
 I've noticed exactly what you guys are seeing here in the past, ALL of the 
 2.5 centers disappear. I don't use 5MHz bandwidth, and I usually lock the 
 scan list on the SM down to the band the AP is operating in. So maybe that's 
 why I was losing only a couple freqs.
 
 On 11/13/2014 9:12 PM, Ryan Ray via Af wrote:
 
 It's crazy. No warning, no release notes about it. How does this come out of 
 all the betas and you lose your SM's because a frequency isn't checked...
 
  
 
 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:09 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
 
 Yeah I noticed that same with 5Ghz looks like they unchecked the rarely used 
 channels in SM with 13.2 programmer was probably thinking he was helping but 
 lots are going to complain 
 
 
 —
 Sent from Mailbox
 
  
 
 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Ryan Ray via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
 
 Just did a 200 group of SM's and the upgrade has removed frequencies that 
 were previously checked. I followed the guide and did the SM's first and 
 AP's last. Luckily the majority of these can see another AP but what the 
 fuck...
 
  
 
 About half of these SM's were on 13.2(34) and the other half were on 
 13.1.3...
 
  
 
 This is what it looks like after an update
 
  
 
 image.png
 
  
 
  
 
 Pre update they were all
 
  
 
 image.png
 
  
 
  
 
 URG
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 


Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes

2014-10-16 Thread RanchBoss via Af
So sad, I have two hardened minds and 6 hardened nurons from that bunch. Never 
deployed.

Sent from my Ranch Phone

On Oct 16, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Gino Villarini via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 We are going  to toss them
 
 Gino A. Villarini
 @gvillarini
 
 
 
 On Oct 16, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Chris Wright via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
 
 1.2.8.6_21016 released in June of this year. 
 http://forum.performantnetworks.com/threads/2015.1438/
  
 Chris Wright
 Velociter Wireless
  
 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Jenkins via Af
 Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 3:20 PM
 To: Timothy D. McNabb via Af
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes
  
 I have a tub of equipment I really wanted to deploy. It's not being actively 
 developed, so I have not deployed it. Are you running the latest software?
 
 
 
  Original message 
 From: Timothy D. McNabb via Af af@afmug.com 
 Date: 10/16/2014 1:58 PM (GMT-07:00) 
 To: af@afmug.com 
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes 
 
 
 Does anyone here on the list use Performant Nurons/Mind combination? What 
 did you find worked best?
  
 -Tim
  
 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chris Wright via Af
 Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:00 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes
  
 We’ve been sitting on a Performant Mind and four Nurons for almost a year 
 now. They sat for six months, then I spent another six months tinkering with 
 them here and there. Regardless of their EOL, we’re looking to implement – 
 but I’m running into the silliest of issues. I can’t even get traffic from 
 the Mind to a Nuron to pass without 20% packet loss. This is without any 
 routing, wireless backhauls, nothing. Just a VLAN-tagged NIC plugged  
 straight into the Mind, Ethernet from Mind to a Nuron (where the vlan 
 “pops”), then Ethernet to a second computer.
  
 I’ve replaced the SFP adapters, the nuron, and verified none of the Ethernet 
 cables are bad by literally coupling them all down a line and going straight 
 from computer 1 to computer 2. No issue there.
  
 This, combined with the fact that this stuff is going to be EOL in three 
 years, is maddening. My boss was under the impression that this should be 
 able to seamlessly integrate into our star topology (nuron at every tower 
 making a ring), but we can’t even get basic LAN functions to work reliably.
  
 Chris Wright
 Velociter Wireless
  


Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 AP stopped responding

2014-09-26 Thread RanchBoss via Af
Seeing -237 and such VC counts on the first page of 5.4 450 APs. Other types 
seem to count correctly.  13.2B30

Allen

Sent from my Ranch Phone

On Sep 26, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Hi Ryan –
  
 While I can’t say for certain what caused the Ethernet Core to get stuck, 
 there are two things in 13.2 that will help with this.  First off, there was 
 a bug in this reporting mechanism that wasn’t allowing a recovery to take 
 place.  That recovery should have been an AP reboot but the logging itself 
 was preventing that.  Secondly, for PMP450, in 13.2, there were architectural 
 changes made such that this type of a problem can’t happen anymore.  Those 
 changes are related to the speed improvements gained with the 13.2 release on 
 PMP450.  PMP430 could still be susceptible to this type of a condition, but 
 the first point I mentioned will correct the recovery in that it won’t let 
 the device sit there unresponsive, it will reset itself if it gets stuck in 
 this kind of condition.
  
 Please try the 13.2 Build 30 beta if you can.  We are close to the 13.2 
 general release.
  
 Regards,
 -Aaron
  
 From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+aaron.schneider=cambiumnetworks@afmug.com] On 
 Behalf Of Ryan Ray via Af
 Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 3:17 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 AP stopped responding
  
 About 30 minutes ago I had a 2.4 AP loaded on 13.1.3 just quit responding. 
 CTM said there was still normal power draw, link was up up on the cisco 
 switch with no errors. No traffic. 
  
 Reset the port from the CTM and it came back. I have another AP up there 
 right beside it on the same software that I haven't seen issues yet. Anyone 
 ever seen this before? I saw this on the bootup log.
  
 **System Startup** 
 System Reset Exception -- 
 Software Version : CANOPY 13.1.3 AP-DES
 Board Type : P12
 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 
 No valid accounts configured. Using default user account - 2460.0 MHz - 20.0 
 MHz - 1/16 - CC 4
 FPGA Version : 011514
 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:24 PDT : Bridge Core : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port.
 09/25/2014 : 01:18:10 PDT : : Bridge Core : Time Set
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:00 PDT : : Bridge Core : 
 01/01/2011 : 00:00:00 UTC : : Bridge Core : Time Set
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:00 PDT : Bridge Core : 
 **System Startup** 
 System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset 
 Software Version : CANOPY 13.1.3 AP-DES
 Board Type : P12
 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - No valid accounts 
 configured. Using default user account - 2460.0 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 4
 FPGA Version : 011514
 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:24 PDT : Bridge Core : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port.
 09/25/2014 : 15:03:05 PDT : : Bridge Core : Time Set
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:02 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:05 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:09 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:12 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:16 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:20 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:23 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:27 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:31 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:34 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:38 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:42 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:45 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:49 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:52 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:56 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:11:00 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:11:03 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:11:07 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
  
 Cheers
  


Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 AP stopped responding

2014-09-26 Thread RanchBoss via Af
Thank you.

Sent from my Ranch Phone

On Sep 26, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 That can be ignored and is fixed already.  It has no bearing on operation, 
 just a display issue.
  
 From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+aaron.schneider=cambiumnetworks@afmug.com] On 
 Behalf Of RanchBoss via Af
 Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 5:27 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 AP stopped responding
  
 Seeing -237 and such VC counts on the first page of 5.4 450 APs. Other types 
 seem to count correctly.  13.2B30
  
 Allen
 
 Sent from my Ranch Phone
 
 On Sep 26, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
 
 Hi Ryan –
  
 While I can’t say for certain what caused the Ethernet Core to get stuck, 
 there are two things in 13.2 that will help with this.  First off, there was 
 a bug in this reporting mechanism that wasn’t allowing a recovery to take 
 place.  That recovery should have been an AP reboot but the logging itself 
 was preventing that.  Secondly, for PMP450, in 13.2, there were architectural 
 changes made such that this type of a problem can’t happen anymore.  Those 
 changes are related to the speed improvements gained with the 13.2 release on 
 PMP450.  PMP430 could still be susceptible to this type of a condition, but 
 the first point I mentioned will correct the recovery in that it won’t let 
 the device sit there unresponsive, it will reset itself if it gets stuck in 
 this kind of condition.
  
 Please try the 13.2 Build 30 beta if you can.  We are close to the 13.2 
 general release.
  
 Regards,
 -Aaron
  
 From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+aaron.schneider=cambiumnetworks@afmug.com] On 
 Behalf Of Ryan Ray via Af
 Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 3:17 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 AP stopped responding
  
 About 30 minutes ago I had a 2.4 AP loaded on 13.1.3 just quit responding. 
 CTM said there was still normal power draw, link was up up on the cisco 
 switch with no errors. No traffic. 
  
 Reset the port from the CTM and it came back. I have another AP up there 
 right beside it on the same software that I haven't seen issues yet. Anyone 
 ever seen this before? I saw this on the bootup log.
  
 **System Startup** 
 System Reset Exception -- 
 Software Version : CANOPY 13.1.3 AP-DES
 Board Type : P12
 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 
 No valid accounts configured. Using default user account - 2460.0 MHz - 20.0 
 MHz - 1/16 - CC 4
 FPGA Version : 011514
 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:24 PDT : Bridge Core : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port.
 09/25/2014 : 01:18:10 PDT : : Bridge Core : Time Set
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:00 PDT : : Bridge Core : 
 01/01/2011 : 00:00:00 UTC : : Bridge Core : Time Set
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:00 PDT : Bridge Core : 
 **System Startup** 
 System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset 
 Software Version : CANOPY 13.1.3 AP-DES
 Board Type : P12
 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - No valid accounts 
 configured. Using default user account - 2460.0 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 4
 FPGA Version : 011514
 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI;
 12/31/2010 : 17:00:24 PDT : Bridge Core : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port.
 09/25/2014 : 15:03:05 PDT : : Bridge Core : Time Set
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:02 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:05 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:09 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:12 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:16 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:20 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:23 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:27 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:31 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:34 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:38 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:42 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:45 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:49 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:52 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:10:56 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:11:00 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:11:03 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
 09/26/2014 : 13:11:07 PDT : : Bridge Core : Ethernet Core failing to report.
  
 Cheers