for WISPS to receive
support. But are ANY WISPS receiving USF support yet?
From: Brian Webster
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 5:04 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AT & T Rural broadband
This is an old map but you get the idea. There are a lot of places on the east
coast that
@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 7:54:20 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AT & T Rural broadband
How many areas are wisps NOT in.
On Sep 28, 2017 7:39 AM, "Dave" < dmilho...@wletc.com > wrote:
+1 I could see that for sure.
But we could get into the area they
How many areas are wisps NOT in.
On Sep 28, 2017 7:39 AM, "Dave" wrote:
> +1 I could see that for sure.
> But we could get into the area they are not and would not go much faster.
>
>
> On 09/28/2017 07:35 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> It would mean cell cos get more federal
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 6:53:25 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AT & T Rural broadband
That's exactly it10mbps puts wireless back in the game for federal funding.
-- Original Message --
From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com >
To: "af"
-
From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 10:05:48 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AT & T Rural broadband
As a note to this...
"As always, you're not going to be blown away by the performance.
You're paying $60 per m
+1 I could see that for sure.
But we could get into the area they are not and would not go much faster.
On 09/28/2017 07:35 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
It would mean cell cos get more federal funding. A lot more.
On Sep 28, 2017 12:37 AM, "Mathew Howard"
I have a very formal L.O.T for those kind and I am sure the Celcos would
love to have his business.
On 09/28/2017 12:30 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
Off the topic, but we have a customer who keeps trying to get our cs
to ise the term broadband. Hes limited to 6x2 and thinks (semi
correctly) he
It would mean cell cos get more federal funding. A lot more.
On Sep 28, 2017 12:37 AM, "Mathew Howard" wrote:
I don't really see how redefining "broadband" to 10/1 is a bad thing...
shouldn't that mean that other companies wouldn't (in theory, anyway) be
able to get
That's exactly it10mbps puts wireless back in the game for federal
funding.
-- Original Message --
From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com>
To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 9/28/2017 1:37:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AT & T Rural broadban
I don't really see how redefining "broadband" to 10/1 is a bad thing...
shouldn't that mean that other companies wouldn't (in theory, anyway) be
able to get funding to overbuild areas where we are already providing
10mbps, which they currently could, unless we have at least 25mbps?
On Sep 28,
I need to hear the voicemails
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Steve Jones
wrote:
> Off the topic, but we have a customer who keeps trying to get our cs to
> ise the term broadband. Hes limited to 6x2 and thinks (semi correctly) he
> can fule an fcc complaint if
Off the topic, but we have a customer who keeps trying to get our cs to
ise the term broadband. Hes limited to 6x2 and thinks (semi correctly) he
can fule an fcc complaint if they use that word. Hes also accused us of
violating federal monopoly laws because we have an exclusive contract on
the
Theyre replacing a tower here five feet from the current tower. I assume my
bosses taxes are helping to fund this assholes
On Sep 27, 2017 6:50 PM, "Tushar Patel" wrote:
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/27/att-rural-wireless-
internet-expands-to-9-more-states/
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/27/att-rural-wireless-internet-expands-to-9
-more-states/
14 matches
Mail list logo