Depends on the wording of the lease. This is why attorneys exist. LOL. I had
a grain leg owner years ago build a new, taller leg right next to the one I was
and rent space to a competitor. My lease did not specify the wording of
“tower” enough so I was advised was all legit. From that point
Yea, typo. Thanks for pointing that out so eloquently.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Andy Trimmell
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 5:41 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
#savage
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
#savage
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 2:12 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
Rogue vs. rouge
A rogue is (1) a scoundrel, (2) a vicious or solitary animal, or (3) a
fraudulent
Rouge access point suppression.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
*Sent:* Monday, July 17, 2017 8:05 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
Just an update on this nonsense. Turns out, this site is the only one
who didnt sign
Rouge access point suppression.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 8:05 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
Just an update on this nonsense. Turns out, this site is the only one who didnt
match with another
> WISP. No one wins.
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 12:30 PM
> *To:* af@afm
:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 12:30 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
ubnt in test mode
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
<fai...@snappytelecom.net <mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net>> wrote:
Let's follow the logic...
Property Owne
: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
that's what I'm wondering, I guess if we got a cease and desist it would
be against the landlord, who would have to stop the tenant?
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fabien <ch...@lakenetmi.com
<mailto:ch...@lakenetmi.com>> wrot
5 663 5518 x 232 <tel:(305)%20663-5518>
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <tel:(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
supp...@snappytelecom.net
_
From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 3:10:52 PM
Subject: Re:
us problem with that if it escalates you end up with a bad
relationship with the landlord and end up pretty much losing either way.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
that'
eve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, June 28, 2017 3:10:52 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
>
> is there realistically any recourse?
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Mitch Koep <af...@abwi
@gmail.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 3:10:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dealing with a lease violation (5ghz)
> is there realistically any recourse?
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Mitch Koep < af...@abwisp.com > wrote:
>> And your questio
that's what I'm wondering, I guess if we got a cease and desist it would be
against the landlord, who would have to stop the tenant?
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:
> Your recourse would be with the landlord. Unfortunately this puts them in
> a bad
Your recourse would be with the landlord. Unfortunately this puts them in a
bad situation since they violated the terms of your lease with them. I
don't think you have any way to make a claim agianst the other ISP unless
you had some non-compete agreement with them or something.
On Wed, Jun 28,
is there realistically any recourse?
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Mitch Koep wrote:
> And your question is?
>
>
>
> On 6/27/2017 11:05 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>
>> I am not asking about any FCC Part X rules, I know this isn't an FCC
>> issue under any circumstances.
>>
>>
And your question is?
On 6/27/2017 11:05 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
I am not asking about any FCC Part X rules, I know this isn't an FCC
issue under any circumstances.
We have leases with all our POP landlords, in the lease we own the
site spectrum, with the exception of very few locations we
I am not asking about any FCC Part X rules, I know this isn't an FCC issue
under any circumstances.
We have leases with all our POP landlords, in the lease we own the site
spectrum, with the exception of very few locations we don't collocate, just
not worth the hassle.
I come rolling up on a
17 matches
Mail list logo