..@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Saturday, September 9, 2017 7:53 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Link to Large Boat
I don't think any of the WISP priced Wimax or LTE stuff has decent
roami
off.
>
> Not a cheap solution but it works. If 30Mbps is sufficient, the routers
> start at around $400, you would need 2.
>
> Rory
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 9, 2017 7:53 AM
> *To:* af@afm
.
Not a cheap solution but it works. If 30Mbps is sufficient, the routers start
at around $400, you would need 2.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2017 7:53 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Link to Large Boat
I don't
there.
-- Original Message --
From: "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 9/7/2017 11:50:45 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Link to Large Boat
Putting aside the sub question and RF for the moment, I would suggest
creating a separate subnet shared
I was on the Vancouver-Victoria BC ferry, those go along a long path and
jump between APs on towers on multiple islands. They use the Proxim 8200
radios which support fast hand-off, and from what I understand they
augmented that with BATS self-aiming systems (instead of the original omnis
- there
http://www.batswireless.com/qd/
Regards,
Chuck
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Steve Jones
wrote:
> I dont think there is any WISP gear that supports seamless handoff. You
> could look at ruckus, which would be a snap, and I think the CNpilot stuff
> does it too.
> I
I dont think there is any WISP gear that supports seamless handoff. You
could look at ruckus, which would be a snap, and I think the CNpilot stuff
does it too.
I guess the first thing that would need defined is seamless.
I think that Telrad, at one point touted multitower connectivity, that may
Expensive for one boat, but we use Wave Relay to do this.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Lewis Bergman
wrote:
> Putting aside the sub question and RF for the moment, I would suggest
> creating a separate subnet shared across all three routers joined by EOIP
> for just
Putting aside the sub question and RF for the moment, I would suggest
creating a separate subnet shared across all three routers joined by EOIP
for just this specific case. If the 3 routers share an upstream this might
be the best place for the gateway for the subnet. This *should* let you
roam
Stupid voice to text it should've said turn the Omni upside down. ??
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 10:08, Craig House wrote:
>
> Turning on the upside down. ??
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 09:58, Dave wrote:
> >
Turning on the upside down. ??
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 09:58, Dave wrote:
>
> Ok, either I am getting to old for these crazy challenges or I am subjecting
> my self to motivation I have not figured this one out yet LOL
>
> We have a large site seeing
Ok, either I am getting to old for these crazy challenges or I am
subjecting my self to motivation I have not figured this one out yet LOL
We have a large site seeing Boat that sits on one of our lakes which
navigates north and south of the lake and some to the east.
We have 3 towers that can
12 matches
Mail list logo