A lot of them will be decommissioned as they fail, as it turns out they
destroy ecosystems and cause droughts. I watched a Nova episode about
salmon genetic variants disappearing because of them. I never even would
have thought about that
On Feb 14, 2017 5:06 PM, "Seth Mattinen"
On 2/14/17 14:50, Ken Hohhof wrote:
People don’t understand building infrastructure anymore, they think it’s
a big deal to build an app.
The peak for dam building was the 1960’s. Dams are expected to last 50
years. Do the math. This will not be an isolated case, unless we start
maintaining
.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 3:16 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
And why hasn't the teaching district been pouring money into a sinking fund for
this sort of thing? Retarded. I see it all
<mailto:af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
<mailto:af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
As of this morning they are saying the regular
in spillway, put some
>> I beam piles
>> under
>> the plates and open it back up. At least until they
>> take some
>> inches
>> off the reservo
n
the turbines to waste more water there too.
-Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
<mailto:af@afmug.com <mailt
, 2017 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
As of this morning they are saying the regular spillway is
supporting
the 100K cfs without further damage. If that it true, then
there is
and open it back up. At least until they take some
>> inches
>> off the reservoir. I wonder if there is a way they can set the
>> angle on
>> the turbines to waste more water there too.
>>
>> -Original Message- From:
ey take some
> inches
> off the reservoir. I wonder if there is a way they can set the
> angle on
> the turbines to waste more water there too.
>
> -----Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
> Sent: Monday, February
ay, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
As of this morning they are saying the regular spillway is
supporting
the 100K cfs without further damage.
off the reservoir. I wonder if there is a way they can set the
>> angle on
>> the turbines to waste more water there too.
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
>> To: af@afmug.c
r. I wonder if there is a way they can set the
angle on
the turbines to waste more water there too.
-Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
There was a discussion about this 10 years ago.
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/02/13/officials-were-warned-the-oroville-dam-emergency-spillway-wasnt-safe-they-didnt-listen/?utm_term=.6e5238eb1b88)
bp
On 2/13/2017 8:11 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
On 2/13/17 11:49, Jason Wilson wrote:
There are no Dams downstream. The Feather empties to the Sacramento
River. There are a number a weirs on the Sacramento that have been
opened to the Bypass (land designated and designed to flood, Farm land,
Rice Paddies) to absorb additional flow that we
back up. At least until they take some inches
>>> off the reservoir. I wonder if there is a way they can set the angle on
>>> the turbines to waste more water there too.
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
>>> Sent: Monday, February 13,
To bad it's water and not beer. I could take care of problem myself.
Chuck McCown wrote:
Good use for aging nukes.
*From:* Josh Reynolds
*Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2017 11:38 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
O/T Physics question:
What kind of energy would
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 12:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
On 2/13/2017 10:30 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
I heard a reporter saying that the water going over that spillway was
doing 100,000 cubic feet per second. I have a really hard time
visualizing that amount
Here's a youtube video of Gavins Point releasing 160,000 cubic feet per
second. They later had it running at nearly 200,000 cubic feet per second.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N-22IVjn0M
On 2/13/2017 1:30 PM, Sam Morris wrote:
On 2/13/2017 10:30 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
I heard a
On 2/13/2017 10:30 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
I heard a reporter saying that the water going over that spillway was
doing 100,000 cubic feet per second. I have a really hard time
visualizing that amount of water. Could also have been a mis-quote by
the reporter...
In 2011 when the Army Corps of
back up. At least until they take some inches
>> off the reservoir. I wonder if there is a way they can set the angle on
>> the turbines to waste more water there too.
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
i.e Trump... I wanna be a "rainmaker" ?
On 02/13/2017 10:48 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Good use for aging nukes.
*From:* Josh Reynolds
*Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2017 11:38 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
O/T Physics question:
What kind of en
there too.
-Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
As of this morning they are saying the regular spillway is supporting
the 100K cfs without further damage.If that it true
Good use for aging nukes.
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:38 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
O/T Physics question:
What kind of energy would be required to cause evaporation of some of the water?
Would this be possible?
On Feb 13, 2017 12
;>
>> -Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
>>
>> As of this morning they are saying the regular spillway is supporting
>> the 100K
sage- From: Robert Andrews
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
>
> As of this morning they are saying the regular spillway is supporting
> the 100K cfs without further damage.If that it true, then there is
&g
on the
turbines to waste more water there too.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Andrews
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
As of this morning they are saying the regular spillway is supporting
the 100K cfs without further damage
As of this morning they are saying the regular spillway is supporting
the 100K cfs without further damage.If that it true, then there is
the ability to deal with what's happening over the next couple of weeks,
which looks like 4-5 sequential storms. We got a 4-5 day break in
weather this
My daughter went to Berklee for a year, it’s a highly regarded music school.
Oh wait, spelled different.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:04 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
Hey, Berkeley grads
t time since the dam was built in 1968. The amount
flowing into the lake from recent rains is >100,000 cfs, and it has to go
somewhere.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 10:31 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2017 10:31 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
>>
>>
>>
>> I heard a reporter saying that the water going over that spillway was
>> doing 100,000 cubic feet per second. I have a really ha
bruary 13, 2017 10:31 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
>
>
>
> I heard a reporter saying that the water going over that spillway was
> doing 100,000 cubic feet per second. I have a really hard time visualizing
> that amount of water. Could al
100,000cfs is correct. That spillway will support 250,000cfs, but the
Feather River channel will only support about 216,000cfs. It has been 10
years since the Channel has been stressed to this point, last time there
were levee breaches. Their hope is to drawdown the reservoir 50 feet below
the
has to go
somewhere.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 10:31 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Oroville dam
I heard a reporter saying that the water going over that spillway was doing
100,000 cubic feet per second. I h
it sounds like more than it is, a football field with 1 foot of water on it
is 57,000 cubic feet
still alot
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
> I heard a reporter saying that the water going over that spillway was
> doing 100,000 cubic feet per second. I
I heard a reporter saying that the water going over that spillway was
doing 100,000 cubic feet per second. I have a really hard time
visualizing that amount of water. Could also have been a mis-quote by
the reporter...
bp
On 2/13/2017 8:11 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
remember when that tunnel collapsed under the chicago river
they dropped everything in that hole, refrigerators, mattresses, garbage,
everything.
this repair was supposed to have been made 3 years ago
i understand some infrastructure repairs get delayed, it happens
but probably best to go ahead
So the "good news" is they're going to drop bags of rocks from helicopters?
I hope my good news never involves helicopters dropping rocks.
37 matches
Mail list logo