Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4

Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone > > - Reply message - > From: "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> > To: <af@afmug.com> > Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 > Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 7:11 PM > > They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a co

Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4

my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone > > - Reply message - > From: "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> > To: <af@afmug.com> > Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 > Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 7:11 PM > > They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple si

Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4

Agreed. Will give it a shot. Firmware too Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply message - From: "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> To: <af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 7:11 PM They released 3.5 last week. I'm

Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4

They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple sites. Seems fine so far. The throughput improvements involve basic bridge config. No extra QoS, no L2/L3 firewall rules. Basically like MikroTik's fast-path. Jay, I think Force200's are going to be your best bet. If your uplink speeds

Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4

The current beta rc says it has throughput improvements, may look into that On Aug 27, 2017 6:00 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" wrote: > > I will post this on the epmp forums a bit later but aside from improving > the upload signal or changing the downlink ratio on a timed

[AFMUG] epmp 2.4

I will post this on the epmp forums a bit later but aside from improving the upload signal or changing the downlink ratio on a timed EPMP system is there any way to improve the upload? We have a few customers I know with signals in the mid 70s on 2.4 that are getting 10-15 meg down but less

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 - elevate

Sorry should have been more clear. epmp 3.4 just came out and enabled 2.4 ghz elevate. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > It is June... and 2.4 elevate

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 - elevate

It is June... and 2.4 elevate has also been released... and it has been out in beta form for well over a month. On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > It is June > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 - elevate

It is June Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:06 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller < par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > > Should be April > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone > >

[AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 - elevate

Should be April Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

50 MHz guard band, that's what I was after :) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy wrote: > I have them at 10MHz channel width. One is at 2412 and one is at 2462. I >

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

I have them at 10MHz channel width. One is at 2412 and one is at 2462. I usually always do them like that unless there is localized interference on one of those channels. On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Jeremy, how much of a guard band was

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

Jeremy, how much of a guard band was used on this? 20 MHz? 40 MHz? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Jeremy wrote: > I have done this with Ubiquiti on 10Mhz channels without

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 8:46 PM *To:* af *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location. I assume these APs are already synced? If it's possible to get some of them onto 5ghz, that would be the way to go... otherwise

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location. It isn't too hard to overload the front-end in the ePMP 1k. Just like the RocketM. I really doubt they're going to do a 2.4 ePMP 2000. Can you try a 40MHz channel on one of the 2.4 APs and shut the other one off? I don't know your

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

Yes both GPS synced. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 8:46 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location. I assume these APs are already synced? If it's possible to get some of them onto

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

I assume these APs are already synced? If it's possible to get some of them onto 5ghz, that would be the way to go... otherwise, I'd say a 40mhz channel on one AP is worth a try. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, George Skorup wrote: > It isn't too hard to overload the

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

It isn't too hard to overload the front-end in the ePMP 1k. Just like the RocketM. I really doubt they're going to do a 2.4 ePMP 2000. Can you try a 40MHz channel on one of the 2.4 APs and shut the other one off? I don't know your setup and terrain, but I would try an ePMP 2k and off-load the

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

I have done this with Ubiquiti on 10Mhz channels without issue. We also have a site with them back to back on 20MHz channels at both ends without issue. They have 4-5' of horizontal separation shooting the same direction and 2-3' back to back. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Brandon Yuchasz

[AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.

So we have a site where all of the customers are south of the tower and we have a 2.4 120 degree KP Performance antenna and ePMP AP pointing at those customers. We have put a lot of SMs onto the AP and before it gets to congested we wanted to add an additional AP. It turns out most of the

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

> > *From:* Nate Burke > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:09 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options > > I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic > takeaway was 'We can do this cool thing, but it r

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

e if >> your signal changes. >> >> >> >> -- Original Message -- >> From: "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> >> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

No, the only benefit is rejection of reflected signals. From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic takeaway was 'We can do this cool thing

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

m.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: 11/22/2016 6:09:37 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic takeaway was 'We can do this cool thing, but it really doesn't gain you anything' It specifically says there is no net SNR ben

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

> -- Original Message -- >> From: "Jaime Solorza" < <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> >> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 an

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

to:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay informati

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

uot;Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> > Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options > > > So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay > information

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

rza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> > Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options > > > So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay > information to chip set to &qu

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

y are/were confident enough in this to make it the "default" setup. >> >> It's a feature of their 802.11n chipset, so the computation is done >> in hardware. >> >> >> -- Original Message -- >> From: "Nate Burke" <n...@bl

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

f@afmug.com>> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these antennas are passive with no smarts. On No

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

<af@afmug.com> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these antennas are passive with no smarts. On

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

;losguyswirel...@gmail.com> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the 3.65. On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: > I think so... > > -Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22, > 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna > options > S

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

Phase. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the 3.65. On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: I think so... -Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

I think so... -Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So if you were to use like a v/h UBNT antenna instead of the Dual Slant antenna, They both should work? Wondering what the 3x

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

from both antennas. I remember reading the original white paper, and I remember thinking I understood it for about 5 minutes or so. -Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So you have

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

> -- Original Message -- >> From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com> >> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> >> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM >> Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options >> >> I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 ant

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options So you have a Dual slant AP and a V/H SM? Isn't that just losing signal for no reason? On 11/22/2016 4:21 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: They've apparently got some electronic magic that can take the received signal on V/H and calculate what

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

hipset, so the computation is done in hardware. -- Original Message -- From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A,

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

quot;Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200 2.4 radios are also Dual Slant to talk

[AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options

I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200 2.4 radios are also Dual Slant to talk to this antenna? I didn't find anything on the Force200 spec sheet talking about slant. If you use a V/H Antenna as

[AFMUG] epmp 2.4 - still no bridge table right?

Running latest release firmware (2.4.2) ; still can't see the bridge table right? i see where it SHOULD be but it's showing blank...

Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 - still no bridge table right?

oh, just looked up another customer and its working fine there. oops. nevermind ;) - Original Message - From: CBB - Jay Fuller To: memb...@wispa.org ; af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:48 PM Subject: epmp 2.4 - still no bridge table right? Running latest

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

Woodfield john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz wrote: No better than Ubiquiti in 2.4? John -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 11:01pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 802.11 quality :P I can't really give you a good

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

No better than Ubiquiti in 2.4? John -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 11:01pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 802.11 quality :P I can't really give you a good answer. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

...@imaginenetworksllc.com Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 11:01pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 802.11 quality :P I can't really give you a good answer. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 8, 2015 10:59 PM, John

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 With my 90* sectors I can do 21dBm on 15dBi @ 10 MHz. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:39 PM, John Woodfield [ john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz ]( mailto:john.woodfi

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

Perfect, Thanks How has it performed in noisy environments? -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 10:48pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 Says 27 is max on my US radio. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

? -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 10:48pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 Says 27 is max on my US radio. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May

[AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

What is the actual maximum TX power you can set these to US models?

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4

With my 90* sectors I can do 21dBm on 15dBi @ 10 MHz. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:39 PM, John Woodfield john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz wrote: What is the actual maximum TX power you can set these to US

Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 stats.....not so good (was alignment help)

...@cyberbroadband.net Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:37 PM To: memb...@wispa.org Cc: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 stats.not so good (was alignment help) I could swear last night I was looking at an EPMP 2.4 unit running 2.4 and i saw it say scanningright there while i was looking at it. yup. just

[AFMUG] epmp 2.4 stats.....not so good (was alignment help)

I could swear last night I was looking at an EPMP 2.4 unit running 2.4 and i saw it say scanningright there while i was looking at it. yup. just did it again. and you KNOW it's registeredor you wouldn't be looking at it. when is the ETA for this to be fixed? :) - Original

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

I had the same initial complaint I have not yet installed any of them somewhat waiting for that to be fixed I can't imagine it would be that big of a bug fix to show the available APs Sent from my iPhone On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:22, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: There's

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

I was going to post to the list to ask a question, but when you say no ap list Are you saying no MAC addresses in the ARP table, because that is what I am seeing. The only ARP entry I see is the radio gateway. My customer devices are not showing in the arp table of the subscriber epmp

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

There's apparently a bunch of things broken. My complaint was not seeing the APs found after a scan on the monitor wireless page. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 26, 2015 1:19 PM, Gilbert Gutierrez

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

Hi, A 2.4.1 Beta release will most likely be posted in the next couple of days with these issues repaired. Dan Sullivan ePMP Software Manager From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Craig House Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:26 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

Not really angry, but seriously disappointed. I mean how could you possibly not check this before a final release? And it hasn't been recalled or anyone notified. I have to assume I wasn't the first to notice this bug. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite

[AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

Are you f$%king serious? Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled before you release it??? What a dumbass bug!!! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

20, 2015 6:19 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list Are you f$%king serious? Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled before you release it??? What a dumbass bug!!! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

LOL Somebody's not angry! :P -- Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 03/20/2015 03:19 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Are you f$%king serious? Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled before you release it??? What a dumbass bug!!! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct:

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

-- *From:* Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 6:19 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list Are you f$%king serious? Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled

[AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 released

Looks like 2.4 is out. Trying RC24 couple nights ago. The new PTP mode cut my throughput about in half. Only saw maybe a 5ms latency improvement over running TDD with flexible. Is the new PTP mode more susceptible to noise perhaps? John Woodfield, President Delmarva WiFi Inc.

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 released

I think with 2.4 they were supposed to drop latency on PTP mode. I'm not sure why you would have lost throughput, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 7:22 PM, John Woodfield john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz wrote: