Not a lawyer,but...
DMCA is about copyright liability. The safe harbor provisions of the
DMCA might shield you from copyright infringement liability if you
transport copyrighted material across your network.
You may have legal protections from transporting unlawful traffic, but
if it isn't
We usually let business do Net 30 so occasionally they get away with 2 months.
A lot of larger businesses have a hard time managing anything under 30 days.
Mark
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 1:21 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> On 9/4/18 10:13 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>> Bankruptcy reorganization is
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:24:15PM -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
[...]
> The safe harbor bit of the DMCA says you are immune from any
> responsibility for carrying the unlawful traffic if you stop the
> unlawful traffic once you're made aware of it, and I'm not clear
> that you're liable for carrying
On 9/4/18 10:13 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Bankruptcy reorganization is the one we come across fairly regularly
where a court orders you not to disconnect to preserve the continuity of
the business during the reorganization and the court will guarantee
payment of the current service. Of
Bankruptcy reorganization is the one we come across fairly regularly where a
court orders you not to disconnect to preserve the continuity of the business
during the reorganization and the court will guarantee payment of the current
service.Of course you get screwed on the service prior to
What sux, is who is the state its unlawful. I hate that I have to disconnect a
user IF I get enough notices, that’s insane. You are guilty and must prove
your innocence, vs what the rest of world does, well most of the world. .
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn
There are some low income situations where you are legally forbidden to
disconnect. I cannot remember if it is a bankruptcy, or divorce or just being
on welfare but I have run into this before.
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 10:24 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re:
Steve,
Unless there's some special circumstance you're not under any obligation
to provide service to anyone. You could disconnect them for any reason
you want.though obviously they don't have to pay you for the service
if you're not delivering it. I.E.: there's no basis to fight a
Forwarding policies are invalidated, and there is caselaw to fight a
disconnect. This better not end up with. Them targeting us again. Really
though that'd still need a search warrant or subpoena to involve us
wouldn't they?
This is where net neutrality may have helped us, not that I want it
I am thinking it would strengthen it.
From: Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2018 9:23 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Court of appeals: IP address is not enough to sue someone
for copyright infringement
hopefully this doesnt degrade safe harbor
On Mon,
I agree.
bp
On 9/3/2018 10:14 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com
wrote:
I think the court got it right.
From: Eric
Kuhnke
I think the court got it right.
From: Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2018 10:50 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: [AFMUG] Court of appeals: IP address is not enough to sue someone for
copyright infringement
12 matches
Mail list logo
