On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <
agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote:
> Stepping back for a moment to be able to see better what is being said.
> It's a jumble out there.
>
> Any computational solution would require a technology stack for every
> purpose to be
Stepping back for a moment to be able to see better what is being said. It's a
jumble out there.
Any computational solution would require a technology stack for every purpose
to be achieved. Arguing over which technology fits best into an AGI stack,
seems unproductive at this stage. Technology
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
> wrote:
> > No, Stefan Reich and Mark Nuzz are right. Blockchain has nothing to do
> > with AGI and doesn't help.
> >
> > Blockchain is a terrible way to implement a distributed data
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
wrote:
> No, Stefan Reich and Mark Nuzz are right. Blockchain has nothing to do
> with AGI and doesn't help.
>
> Blockchain is a terrible way to implement a distributed data store. It
> is not scalable. Every node stores a copy of every
It's just math. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem
When you add random variables, you add their means and variances and
the sum tends to a Gaussian curve. When you multiply instead of add,
the same thing happens when you take the log of the distributions.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at
Please, no blockchain in AI... it really doesn't help anything.
Cheers,
Stefan
On 16 June 2018 at 14:45, wrote:
> Distributed decentralized autonomous AGI, temporal memory, lossy =
> forgetting even just dropping blocks, some memory on-chain some off.
> On-chain slower more secure, off-chain
