I'll take jargon salad over buzzword soup any day.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:26 PM Matt Mahoney via AGI
wrote:
> Recipe for jargon salad.
>
> Two cups of computer science.
> One cup mathematics.
> One cup electrical engineering.
> One cup neuroscience.
> One half cup information theory.
> Four
Looks like a scam to me as they seem to be bare bones with content but
claim they can build it with $350,000 and 9 months time. Basically asking
for money and I don't see really any evidence or papers they are putting
forth to support their viewpoint.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:52 AM
I would think that a far more detailed explanation of this topology should
be provided before any productive discussions could take form.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:16 PM, Steve Richfield via AGI <
agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote:
> I seems that reality is organized somewhat like an onion...
>
> In
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
wrote:
> Recursive self improvement in a closed environment is not possible because
> intelligence depends on knowledge and computing power. These can only come
> from outside the simulation.
>
>
I generally agree with this. But let's go into
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> > I think that all money spent on marketing at this point is not only a
> waste,
> > but it is actually worse than doing no marketing, because people hear of
> the
> > project before it's released, then they get a poor first impression and
So the moral of the story is that a blockchain is not necessary for that
use case, and adds unnecessary constraints... I'm hopeful about the
sharding and sidechains but probably not as optimistic as some.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 1:54 AM, wrote:
> They got the data! And they got a "distributed
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 1:40 AM, wrote:
> Why would anyone want to do that?
>
> Ans: For model checking on a distributed imagination.
>
> Just figured I’d throw that out there
>
> John
>
>
Sounds like Facebook's data mining practices.
--
Artificial
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Mark Nuzz wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
>
>> > My opinion on those technologies you mention is that, while novel and
>> > promising, they are still in an experimental stage. It's a huge mistake
>> to
>> > assemble a system
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <
agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote:
> Stepping back for a moment to be able to see better what is being said.
> It's a jumble out there.
>
> Any computational solution would require a technology stack for every
> purpose to be
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
> wrote:
> > No, Stefan Reich and Mark Nuzz are right. Blockchain has nothing to do
> > with AGI and doesn't help.
> >
> > Blockchain is a terrible way to implement a distributed data
The Singularity analogy was never intended to imply infinite power. Rather
it represents a point at which understanding and predictability breaks down
and becomes impossible.
On Jun 14, 2018 3:59 PM, "Matt Mahoney via AGI"
wrote:
> Vinge: when humans produce superhuman AI then so can it, only
This is hardly spam, and Logan is not a spammer. The topic of AGI business
development has been discussed on this list many times.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:46 AM, MP via AGI wrote:
> Don’t spam us with marketing nonsense. This is a place to discuss
> artificial minds, not selling them!
>
>
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:15 PM, A.T. Murray via AGI
wrote:
> For twenty-five years (since July of 1993) Yours Truly Mentifex here has
> been coding an AI Mind, first in REXX on the Commodore Amiga, then in Forth
> on a computer from FreePC.com (they gave away 40,000 free
13 matches
Mail list logo