sorry John, to continue...
Fractals? Yes, the knowledge methodologies employed, to date, are fractal
based, each component being a pure object, some recursive, others self
recursive. Each one represents as a system of systems on their own, and then
collectively at a quantum level. I have taken
@ John
Thanks for the useful input. Stuff to think about.
The GRAPE system in Japan provides an indication of the level of hardware
required. I'm no hardware expert, but I get what they are on about. I read
somewhere that a parallel link test was conducted with Playstation 3's, and
they actual
> -Original Message-
> From: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI [mailto:a...@listbox.com]
>
>
> The 100 billion star problem in computing, I think it is called that, may
be a
> realistic approximation of the scale of the challenge in processing, let
alone
> design, faced by quantum
Steve: If you're looking for a knowledge representation take a look at neural
propositions:
http://independent.academia.edu/PiagetModeler
They employ forward, reverse, and cascade activation flow.
~PM
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:57:05 -0800
Subject: Re: [agi] Multiverse alternative to disambiguat
PM, Ben, et al,
Lakoff seems to be making the usual assortment of errors common to the
field of cognitive psychology, especially:
1. Thinking because he thinks he sees SOME way of doing something, that it
most work that way,
2. Thinking that our puny mental models of our own operation have anyth
