On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:28:08PM -0300, Felipe Carmona Miquilini wrote:
Why are there lot of people who loves to use Linux/Unix terminals (I mean,
through command line), instead of a practical GUI (perhaps Windows?)? One
answer could be because they know that in several moments they will
We are a good example of Intelligent beings, I mean in our point of view,
we are an awesome starting point of an instance of an intelligent being.
Being so it is quite logic to compare our conceptual models and/or approach
in AGI alongside our own inner models. And I think it will drive to a
Two questions, Two points of view, One problem
Why are computers less intelligent than us?
Why do we consider computers less intelligent than us?
Why are we focusing on creating computers with more functionality instead
of focusing on solving the problem of the hungry and other suffering from
Felipe Carmona Miquilini wrote:
Two questions, Two points of view, One problem
Why are computers less intelligent than us?
Why do we consider computers less intelligent than us?
Why are we focusing on creating computers with more functionality
instead of focusing on solving the problem of
Sent: 11/05/2015 4:46 AM
To: AGI a...@listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Colin,
OK, I think I see our point of confusion. I covered this point briefly
before. I'll try again...
You seem to be stuck on a particular explanation involving exquisite
sensitivity
--
To: a...@listbox.com
From: col.ha...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:34:16 +1000
Grocking done. I think.
I'm 'stuck' on replicating the signaling that happens in the brain using
the physics the brain uses
/2015 4:46 AM
To: AGI a...@listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Colin,
OK, I think I see our point of confusion. I covered this point briefly
before. I'll try again...
You seem to be stuck on a particular explanation involving exquisite
sensitivity that is NOT needed
application) at a structured (in the
sense of RD based) systems-analysis and design level.
Watching bio-forms grow
Rob
--
To: a...@listbox.com
From: col.ha...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:34:16 +1000
Grocking done
@Russ
Thank you for the link. Most useful.
Rob
From: rhurl...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 02:55:30 +
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
To: a...@listbox.com
@Steve, Colin
The link here provides a list of papers that I pulled together from prior
research in hope
Hi Russ,
Thanks for the links. I'll assimilate them into my database of papers on
it. Some I know of already. None of mine are in the list. Most of it is in
the class (I suspect) of 'possibly useful to understand a human meat brain'
but less so if you want to build an artificial brain. All
@Steve, Colin
The link here provides a list of papers that I pulled together from prior
research in hope of nudging the discussion along. I have not been following
all of the details here, but would be interested in your reaction to any of
these (mostly) divergent theories and models as it
a...@listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Colin,
OK, I think I see our point of confusion. I covered this point briefly before.
I'll try again...
You seem to be stuck on a particular explanation involving exquisite
sensitivity that is NOT needed to make super-sensitive
old circuits!
Cheers
Colin
--
From: Steve Richfield steve.richfi...@gmail.com
Sent: 7/05/2015 7:15 PM
To: AGI a...@listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Colin,
Are you familiar with super-regenerative receivers? These are simple
Richfield steve.richfi...@gmail.com
Sent: 7/05/2015 7:15 PM
To: AGI a...@listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Colin,
Are you familiar with super-regenerative receivers? These are simple
circuits - well within what we already know neurons can do, that extract
subtle
Richfield steve.richfi...@gmail.com
Sent: 10/05/2015 6:06 AM
To: AGI a...@listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Colin,
I think you missed my point. I'll try again...
The information content in the EM field is, except for that portion of the EM
field that is generated
as those old circuits!
Cheers
Colin
-Original Message-
From: Steve Richfield steve.richfi...@gmail.com
Sent: 7/05/2015 7:15 PM
To: AGI a...@listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
Colin,
Are you familiar with super-regenerative receivers? These are simple circuits
colin hales wrote:
I remember those circuits You sometimes can find them in old books
that also speak of the 'aether'
It's not a route to brain-mimetic fields.
All we really have to do is replicate the fields of the membrane. I
already know how they are generated. They 100% consistent
Colin,
Are you familiar with super-regenerative receivers? These are simple
circuits - well within what we already know neurons can do, that extract
subtle features of EM fields - like the energy at a particular frequency.
This concept could be adapted to extract all sorts of subtle features from
Steve, here's some input.
Colin stated:
Because
it's not using neurons it won't automatically mimic brains in
structure. I have no idea what a brain will look like. Physically its a
crystalline rock. No actual material growth.
I think Colin is building a generic platform for generative,
Subject: Re: [agi] Restating Colin's Hypothesis
From: stask...@gmail.com
To: a...@listbox.com
Not bad guys, but next question time. It's either a really stupid question or a
legit next step in terms of quantum biophysics. What are the Feynman diagrams
of these EM fields when they are generated
Hi all,
I'm struggling to find time to attend here. My appearances will be patchy.
Your restatement of where I am is heading in the right direction. That is,
you're grappling with the beginnings of the right ideas. Which is good to
see. My goal here is simply to get the general idea of AGI as a
21 matches
Mail list logo
