Just got on the list, would like to introduce my
approach to general AI:
Intelligence is not an empirically specific
ability, - we can learn anything. Therefore its method can only be derived from
functional definition of intelligence, not for or from any specific property of
inputs, Well,
Hi,
You make a lot
of different points... I'll just grab one for the moment
***
I don't believe in combining different methods
because cognition deals with the unknown, - we can't a priori split it into
different areas, except to the extent that they're sensor/hardware specific,
Thanks for your comments!
I like
to distinguish between *functional specialization* and *integrated
cognition*
Novamente (my own AI system) has a mix of
cognitive algorithms, which work together to provide overall cognitive
functionality. The exact mixture of algorithms is determined by a
hi,
***
It seems to me thatconceptual
difference between vision language is inthe level of generalization,
aside from different sensor/actuator orientation. Social Interaction? Once you start coding things that
are learnable, where do you stop before ending up with just another expert
Well, in Novamente we are not coding *specific knowledge* that is learnable... but we are coding implicit knowledge as to what sorts of learning processes are most useful in which specialized subdomains...
I'm reminded of an AI pioneer who once commented on this same situation - he closed his
Well, in Novamente we are not coding*specific
knowledge*thatis learnable... but we are coding implicit knowledge
as to what sorts of learning processes are most useful in which specialized
subdomains...
***
I don't know, from where I sit this distinction is
artificial. Learning is generally
***
Well, in
Novamente we are not coding*specific knowledge*thatis
learnable... but we are coding implicit knowledge as to what sorts of learning
processes are most useful in which specialized subdomains...
---
I don't know, from where
I sit this distinction is artificial. Learning is
Friday, January 3, 2003, 11:37:15 PM, Mike Deering wrote:
MDThe intelligence of computer software keeps constant with the
MDcapability of the $1000 desktop.
I strongly disagree. The intelligence of computer software has
remained pretty constant. The feature lists (and memory, disk and
