From a promotional perspective these ideas seem quite weak.
It was an addition to other complex and relatively near future issues
e.g. the longevity and demographic related problems mentioned by
Minsky in his emergency presentation.
What are your suggestions?
AI saving the world .. sounds
Hi,
Aside from Novamente and CYC, who else has attempted to staple
NLP to a reasoning engine? I just pasted a good NLP parser
I found on the net, onto a home-brew, cut-rate reimplementation
of the CYC reasoning engine. I've got simple things working
(answers what is X? questions, and remembers
Linas,
I don't believe attaching NLP functionality on top of perception
engine can help much. AI that is capable of general learning should be
able to also learn language processing, from the letters up. So it's
just another capability that should be accounted for. NLP can only
help with feeding
AGI does not need promoting. AGI could potentially replace all human labor,
currently valued at US $66 trillion per year worldwide. Google has gone from
nothing to the fifth biggest company in the U.S. in 10 years by solving just a
little bit of of the AI problem better than its competitors.
We
On 30/10/2007, Pei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the link. I agree that this work is moving in an
interesting direction, though I'm afraid that for AGI (and adaptive
systems in general), TM may be too low as a level of description ---
the conclusions obtained in this kind of work
Great summary of the issue and open questions.
Stefan
On Nov 1, 2007 10:34 AM, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGI does not need promoting. AGI could potentially replace all human
labor,
currently valued at US $66 trillion per year worldwide. Google has gone
from
nothing to the
AGI does not need promoting.
Considering
a) how important AGI is
b) how many dev teams seriously work on AGI
c) how many investors are willing to spend good money on AGI RD
I believe AGI does need promoting. And it's IMO similar with the
immortality research some of the Novamente folks are
