Dennis: I just want to note, that Google does exactly that: it finds
analogies
to your search queries in any context
Er, really? Some examples?
If you ask Google to find *existing* analogies, yes. If you ask it for cool
as a --- it may come up with various known analogies - cucumber/ ice
On 21/11/2007, Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin,
That's massive amount of work, but most AGI research and development
can be shared with narrow AI research and development.
There is plenty overlap btw AGI and narrow AI but not as much as you
suggest...
That's only
William P: My theory of intelligence is something like this. Intelligence
requires the changing of programmatic-structures in an arbitrary
fashion, so that we can learn, and learn how to learn.
Well, you're getting v. close. But be careful, because you'll upset Ben and
Pei not to mention cog
Dennis Gorelik wrote:
Richard,
specific technical analysis of the AGI problem that I have made
indicates that nothing like a 'prototype' is even possible until
after a massive amount of up-front effort.
I probably misunderstand you first time.
I thought you meant that this massive amount of
--- Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you describe a piece of technology that simultaneously:
- Is required for AGI.
- Cannot be required part of any useful narrow AI.
A one million CPU cluster.
-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI:
On Nov 22, 2007 12:59 AM, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you describe a piece of technology that simultaneously:
- Is required for AGI.
- Cannot be required part of any useful narrow AI.
A one million CPU cluster.
Is a required
--- Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the analogies, my point is that AGI will quickly evolve to
invisibility
from a human-level intelligence.
I think you underestimate how quickly performance deteriorates with the
growth of complexity.
AGI systems would have lots of
On Nov 20, 2007 8:27 PM, Dennis Gorelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Start with weak AI programs. That would push technology envelope
further and further and in the end AGI will be possible.
Yeah - because weak AI is so simple. Why not just make some
run-of-the-mill narrow AI with a single goal of
