Re: [agi] Four axioms (Was Two draft papers: AI and existential risk; heuristics and biases)

2006-06-10 Thread Mark Waser
- Original Message - From: "Charles D Hixson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:26 PM Subject: Re: [agi] Four axioms (Was Two draft papers: AI and existential risk; heuristics and biases) I think that Axiom 2 needs a bit of work. Agreed. as I read it, it

[agi] Four axioms (Was Two draft papers: AI and existential risk; heuristics and biases)

2006-06-08 Thread Mark Waser
From: "Eugen Leitl" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 12:59 PM Let us hear these axioms, please. I don't think a rehash of Asimov's 4 laws is going to cut the mustard, though. I thought you'd never ask . . . . (and no, the disproofs of Asimov's laws are handled quite well

Re: [agi] Four axioms (Was Two draft papers: AI and existential risk; heuristics and biases)

2006-06-08 Thread Charles D Hixson
Mark Waser wrote: .. The first thing that is necessary is to define your goals. It is my contention that there is no good and no bad (or evil) except in the context of a goal and that those who believe that there is some absolute morality out there have been fooled by the unconscious