Arthur Murray wrote:
If Ben Goertzel and the rest of the Novamente team build up
an AI that mathematically comprehends mountains of data,
they may miss the AI boat by not creating persistent concepts
that accrete and auto-prune over time as the basis of NLP.
No, even before the Novamente
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Hi,
Personally, I believe that the most effective AI will have a core
general intelligence, that may be rather primitive, and a huge number of
specialized intelligence modules. The tricky part of this architecture
is designing the various modules so that they can
Charles Hixson wrote (in response to me):
-- create a flexible knowledge representation (KR) useful for
representing
all forms of knowledge (declarative, procedural, perceptual, abstract,
linguistic, explicit, implicit, etc. etc.)
This probably won't work. Thinking of the brain as a
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Ben Goertzel wrote:
Charles Hixson wrote (in response to me):
[...]
May I suggest that if you are even close to what you are attempting,
that you have the start of a dandy personal secretary. With so much
correspondence coming via e-mail these days, this would create
The problem with a truly general intelligence is that the search spaces
are too large. So one uses specializing hueristics to cut down the
amount of search space. This does, however, inevitably remove a piece
of the generality. The benefit is that you can answer more
complicated questions
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 14:11, Charles Hixson wrote:
Personally, I believe that the most effective AI will have a core
general intelligence, that may be rather primitive, and a huge number of
specialized intelligence modules. The tricky part of this architecture
is designing the various
