RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-11 Thread Ben Goertzel
Bill Hibbard wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ben Goertzel wrote: A goal in Novamente is a kind of predicate, which is just a function that assigns a value in [0,1] to each input situation it observes... i.e. it's a 'valuation' ;-) Interesting. Are these values used for

RE: [agi] AGI morality - goals and reinforcement values

2003-02-11 Thread Philip Sutton
Ben/Bill, My feeling is that goals and ethics are not identical concepts. And I would think that goals would only make an intentional ethical contribution if they related to the empathetic consideration of others. So whether ethics are built in from the start in the Novamente architecture

RE: [agi] AGI morality - goals and reinforcement values - plus early learning

2003-02-11 Thread Philip Sutton
Ben, Right from the start, even before there is an intelligent autonomous mind there, there will be goals that are of the basic structural character of ethical goals. I.e. goals that involve the structure of compassion, of adjusting the system's actions to account for the well-being of

RE: [agi] AGI morality - goals and reinforcement values

2003-02-11 Thread Bill Hibbard
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Philip Sutton wrote: Ben/Bill, My feeling is that goals and ethics are not identical concepts. And I would think that goals would only make an intentional ethical contribution if they related to the empathetic consideration of others. . . . Absolutely goals (I prefer

Re: [agi] AGI morality - goals and reinforcement values

2003-02-11 Thread Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
Bill Hibbard wrote: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Philip Sutton wrote: Ben/Bill, My feeling is that goals and ethics are not identical concepts. And I would think that goals would only make an intentional ethical contribution if they related to the empathetic consideration of others. Absolutely

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Bill Hibbard
Hi Philip, On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Philip Sutton wrote: Ben, If in the Novamente configuration the dedicated Ethics Unit is focussed on GoalNode refinement, it might be worth using another term to describe the whole ethical architecture/machinery which would involve aspects of most/all (??)

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Ben Goertzel
My idea is that action-framing and environment-monitoring are carried out in a unified way in Units assigned to these tasks generically. ..ethical thought gets to affect system behavior indirectly through a), via ethically-motivated GoalNodes, both general ones and

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Anissimov
Philip Sutton wrote: Maybe we need to think about an 'ethics system' that is woven into the whole Novamente architecture and processes. How about a benevolence-capped goal system where all the AI's actions flow from a single supergoal? That way you aren't adding ethics into a fundamentally

Re: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
Ben Goertzel wrote: However, it's to be expected that an AGI's ethics will be different than any human's ethics, even if closely related. What do a Goertzelian AGI's ethics and a human's ethics have in common that makes it a humanly ethical act to construct a Goertzelian AGI? -- Eliezer S.

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Ben Goertzel
I think we all agree that, loosely speaking, we want our AGI's to have a goal of respecting and promoting the survival and happiness of humans and all intelligent and living beings. However, no two minds interpret these general goals in the same way. You and I don't interpret them exactly the

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Anissimov
Ben Goertzel writes: This is a key aspect of Eliezer Yudkowsky's Friendly Goal Architecture Yeah; too bad there isn't really anyone else to cite on this one. It will be interesting to see what other AGI pursuers have to say about the hierarchial goal system issue, once they write up their

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Bill Hibbard
Hi Ben, I think discussing ethics in terms of goals leads to confusion. As I described in an earlier post at: http://www.mail-archive.com/agi@v2.listbox.com/msg00390.html reasoning must be grounded in learning and goals must be grounded in values (i.e., the values used to

Re: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-10 Thread Brad Wyble
There might even be a benefit to trying to develop an ethical system for the earliest possible AGIs - and that is that it forces everyone to strip the concept of an ethical system down to its absolute basics so that it can be made part of a not very intelligent system. That will

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-09 Thread Ben Goertzel
] Subject: RE: [agi] AGI morality Ben, One issue you didn't respond to that I suggested was: I also think that AGIs need to have a built in commitment to devote an adequate amount of mind space to monitoring the external environment and internal thought processes to identify issues where

RE: [agi] AGI morality

2003-02-09 Thread Philip Sutton
Ben, I agree that a functionally-specialized Ethics Unit could make sense in an advanced Novamente configuration. .devoting a Unit to ethics goal-refinement on an architectural level would be a simple way of ensuring resource allocation to ethics processing through successive system