Stefan Pernar wrote:
Richard, there is no substance behind your speculations - zero. Zip. And
all the fantasy and imagination you so clearly demonstrated here on the
board wont make up for that. You make stuff up as you go along and as
you need it and you clearly have enough time at your hand
Richard, there is no substance behind your speculations - zero. Zip. And all
the fantasy and imagination you so clearly demonstrated here on the board
wont make up for that. You make stuff up as you go along and as you need it
and you clearly have enough time at your hand to do so.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Mark Waser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard, there is no substance behind your speculations - zero. Zip.
And all the fantasy and imagination you so clearly demonstrated here on the
board wont make up for that. You make stuff up as you go along and as you
.listbox.com
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 1:03 PM
Subject: **SPAM** Re: [agi] Evaluating Conference Quality [WAS Re: Symbol
Grounding ...]
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Mark Waser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard, there is no substance behind your speculations - zero. Zip. And
all
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Pernar wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
On 5/7/08, Stefan Pernar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What follows are wild speculations and grand pie-in-the-sky plans without
substance with a letter to investors attached. Oh, come on!
Um, people, is this list really the place for fielding personal insults?
For what it's worth, my two cents:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Pernar wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Feedback on AGI-06 overall was overwhelmingly positive; in fact
Richard's is the only significantly negative report I've seen.
Of course, if the conference was filled with low-quality
Stefan Pernar wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Feedback on AGI-06 overall was overwhelmingly positive; in fact
Richard's is the only significantly negative report I've seen.
: Re: [agi] Evaluating Conference Quality [WAS Re: Symbol
Grounding ...]
Stefan Pernar wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Feedback on AGI-06 overall was overwhelmingly positive; in
fact
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stefan Pernar wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL
PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DELETED
Ben: I admire your patience.
Richard: congrats - you just made my ignore
11 matches
Mail list logo
