On Monday 01 October 2007 10:32:57 pm, William Pearson wrote:
A quick question, do people agree with the scenario where, once a non
super strong RSI AI becomes mainstream it will replace the OS as the
lowest level of software? It does not to my mind make sense that for
it to be layered on top
that it is useless.
- Original Message -
From: William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: AI and botnets Re: [agi] What is the complexity of RSI?
On 01/10/2007, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- William Pearson
--- William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/10/2007, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/09/2007, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real danger is this: a program intelligent enough to understand
software
On 02/10/2007, Mark Waser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick question, do people agree with the scenario where, once a non
super strong RSI AI becomes mainstream it will replace the OS as the
lowest level of software?
For the system that it is running itself on? Yes, eventually. For
--- William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/09/2007, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real danger is this: a program intelligent enough to understand
software
would be intelligent enough to modify itself.
Well it would always have the potential. But you are assuming it
On 01/10/2007, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/09/2007, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real danger is this: a program intelligent enough to understand
software
would be intelligent enough to modify itself.
Well it
