Re: [agi] Within-cell computation in biological neural systems??

2004-02-10 Thread Brad Wyble

The jury is very much out Phillip.  Eliezer goes too far in saying it's a 
myth perpetuated by computer scientists.  They use the simplest 
representations they know to exist in their models for purposes of 
parsimony.  It's hard to fault them for being rigorous in this respect.  


But neurons are surely far more complex than this.  The majority of 
computation may well occur within the nonlinear bursting dynamics of 
dendrites.

Just as an example, a new type of neuron has recently been discovered that 
can hold a steady state of firing in isolation, apply current, rate 
increases and remains stable at a new threshold.  It's dynamically 
settable, which blows away all standard Integrate  Fire models.  

We're just scratching the surface of an enormous iceberg.  If you're 
trying to build some useful index of brain power based on number of 
neurons (or even synapses), give up and wait 30 years at least.  

-Brad 



---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[agi] Futurological speculations

2004-02-10 Thread Ben Goertzel

Hi all,

Here's another essay from the Ben Goertzel spare-time essay-writing
factory that seems to be very active these last few months.  This one is
related to AGI but more in the futurological vein than the currently
practical vein.

It's called

Encouraging a Positive Transcension: AI Buddha versus AI Big Brother,
Voluntary Joyous Growth, the Tao of Speciecide, and Other Issues in
Transhumanist Ethical Philosophy

You can find it at

http://www.goertzel.org/papers/PositiveTranscension.htm

It was about 27 pages in Word -- not nearly enough to say everything I have
to say about the topic, so it's a bit too terse in parts; but alas, other
duties call...

It's a first draft, and there may be some bits and pieces of thinking in
there that appealed to me at the time of writing but won't appeal to me next
week.  But the broad outlines of the ideas presented there have been in my
head for a long time, and some of them have popped up here and there in
discussions on this list.

-- Ben G

---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [agi] Within-cell computation in biological neural systems??

2004-02-10 Thread Yan King Yin
From: Brad Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The jury is very much out Phillip.  Eliezer goes too far in saying it's a 
myth perpetuated by computer scientists.  They use the simplest 
representations they know to exist in their models for purposes of 
parsimony.  It's hard to fault them for being rigorous in this respect.

Uploading is not the same as using ANNs to emulate the brain,
it has more to do with computational neuroscience and realistic
modeling.

But neurons are surely far more complex than this.  The majority of 
computation may well occur within the nonlinear bursting dynamics of 
dendrites.

Nonlinear dendritic integration can be accurately captured by the
comparmental model which divides dendrites into small sections
with ion channels and other internal reaction mechanisms. This
is the most accurate level of modeling. It may be possible to
simplify this model with machine learning techniques and without
significant loss in accuracy.

Just as an example, a new type of neuron has recently been discovered that 
can hold a steady state of firing in isolation, apply current, rate 
increases and remains stable at a new threshold.  It's dynamically 
settable, which blows away all standard Integrate  Fire models.  

I don't know the exact mechanisms that give rise to that type
of neurons, but the comparmental model should be able to cover
this. What is needed is a large-scale database of neuronal
characteristics (automation).

We're just scratching the surface of an enormous iceberg.  If you're
trying to build some useful index of brain power based on number of
neurons (or even synapses), give up and wait 30 years at least.

Intra-cellular signal processing is the most problematic
area, which requires proteomics to fully understand. I
don't know...

YKY



Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10

---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]