Thanks for that.
Dont you see the way to go on Neural nets is hybrid with genetic algorithms in
mass amounts?
eldras
- Original Message -
From: Kingma, D.P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: [agi] interesting Google Tech Talk about Neural Nets
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008
Although top down should continue being researched tried, the complexity is
still monumental.
We KNOW that bottom up delivers AGI, and Turing's view was that heuristics are
enough to build it.
That is only doable at mass speeds assumed possible in eg quantum computing.
eldras
interesting you're attempting that via goals, because goals will mutate; one
alternative is to control the infrastructure eg have systems that die when
they've run a certain course., and watcher systems that check mutations.
- Original Message -
From: Kaj Sotala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Care to state the exact problem you were having?
My thought is scalability is to do entirely with speed availability
- Original Message -
From: Bob Mottram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] interesting Google Tech Talk about Neural Nets
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008
that's a great idea Vlad, there are other forms of statistical sampling
available.
the closer we get to running accelerated evolution to human intelligence the
better I beleive.
- Original Message -
From: Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi]
