Hi,
This is to let you know of the arrival of this publication:
Hales, C.G., and Ericson, M.L. (2022). Electromagnetism’s Bridge Across the
Explanatory Gap: How a Neuroscience/Physics Collaboration delivers
Explanation into all Theories of Consciousness. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience 16.
here it is, the talk:
https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T17fd28660e528bdc-M518ad16fd62979162e5ad87f
Delivery options:
June 17, 2022, 7AM-8:30AM Pacific time: Rob Freeman on chaotic cognitive
linguistics ... Videoconference at:
https://singularitynet.zoom.us/my/benbot
Background: See the video of Rob's talk from AGI-21
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiVet-b-NM8
https://wiki.opencog.org/w/AGI_Discussion_Forum
I'm still not on the boat d00dz?
Hell, Oliver Wendell Holmes called computers the "triumph of the ciphering
hand organ" and he was completely right. This isn't even AI, it's rubbing
sticks together and flipping switches. Richard Feynman would be looking at
this stuff and going.. "Yer MORONZ,
An example of humility in a system, or more of a lack of really. Big pharma,
AKA big balls pharma, decides ya we need to go in and start tweaking the immune
system. We're smart, even though the immune system code is millions of years
old and working pretty good we need to go in and fix it. And
On Friday, June 17, 2022, at 9:49 AM, Greg Staskowski wrote:
> I need, I move toward the environment to fill the need, food, poop, air,
> water. Ok. Oh look..
I connected with the line immediately (joking :D)
On Friday, June 17, 2022, at 9:49 AM, Greg Staskowski wrote:
> I'm seriously just
I'll see your new chip and raise you Intel and NUfab at Northwestern and ok
fine you've got an argument but an epistemological argument for
consciousness?
What does that have to do with quantum biophysics or actual real wetware
neurons?
I don't think a "theory of consciousness" is possible. It's
Personally I always like reading "no general-purpose computing, no
software, no models, no programming"... I will put this on my list to
read. It looks like a lot of work.
On 6/17/22, Greg Staskowski wrote:
> I'll see your new chip and raise you Intel and NUfab at Northwestern and ok
> fine
On Monday, June 13, 2022, at 8:03 PM, Tony Cole wrote:
> "breakthrough conversation technology"
The chatbot was probably trying to figure out if the engineer was sentient.
When engineer becomes chatbot and chatbot becomes engineer :)
--
Artificial General
Hi all,
If you care to examine in detail Part Ii and the supplementary material,
you'll find the entire thing is empirical and stands on the shoulders of
the standard model of particle physics.
This means it's all over.
No more philosophy (it leaves the room) as depicted in the article.
No more
10 matches
Mail list logo
