I have a list at
http://www.cis.temple.edu/~pwang/203-AI/Lecture/203-1126.htm, including
projects satisfying the following three standards:
a.. Each of them has the plan to eventually grow into a "thinking machine"
or "artificial general intelligence" (so it is not merely about part of AI);
b..
Hi,
Inspired by a recent post, here is my attempt at a list of "serious AGI
projects" underway on the planet at this time.
If anyone knows of anything that should be added to this list, please let me
know.
. Novamente ...
· Pei Wangs NARS system
· Peter Vosss A2I2 pro
Pei,
Your criteria are more stringent than mine, but your list was made with a
similar idea in mind I'm not making restrictions about the number of
years a project has been in existence, for example.
It appears the only thing on your list that I missed is the OSCAR project
***
http://osca
C. David Noziglia
Object Sciences Corporation
6359 Walker Lane, Alexandria, VA
(703) 253-1095
"What is true and what is not? Only God knows. And, maybe, America."
Dr. Khaled M. Batarfi, Special to Arab
News
"Just because something is obvious doesn't mean
David Noziglia wrote:
> It is a common belief that game theory has shown that it is
> advantageous to
> be selfish and nasty. I assume that the members of this group
> know that is
> wrong, that game theory has in fact shown that in a situation of repeated
> interaction, it is more advantageous
Pei,
I've been reading thru some of the papers on the OSCAR site,
>
> http://oscarhome.soc-sci.arizona.edu/ftp/OSCAR-web-page/OSCAR.htm
>
The general cognitive architecture Pollock proposes there seems reasonable,
although I feel it's very incomplete, focusing exclusively on logical
inference a
I think the key fact is that most of these projects are currently
relatively inactive --- plenty of passion out there, just not a
lot of resources.
The last I heard both the HAL project and the CAM-brain project
where pretty much at a stand still due to lack of funding?
Perhaps a good piece of
I studied OSCAR years ago, but haven't followed it closely. Simply speaking,
both OSCAR and NARS are "logic-based" approaches, and their major difference
is that OSCAR stays much closer to traditional mathematical logic (in terms
of formal language, semantics, rules, control mechanism, and so on).