The key to life the universe and everything:
All things can be expressed using any Universal Computer
You are a Universal Computer (one that can read(remmember/imagine),
write(experience), erase(forget)).
All the things you believe/know/understand are true.
I believe the key to AI rests in
I've actually been in really different universes. Where you could write text
and it would do as you instructed. I tried checking out the filesystem but
it was barren and bin was empty *shrugs*.
Like I said, You don't have to believe me if you don't want to. I am but
another one of your
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
On 2/19/07, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, I leave off email for two days and a 55-message Religious War
breaks out! ;-)
I promise this is nothing to do with languages I do or do not like (i.e.
it is non-religious...).
As many people pointed out,
My real point is that you don't really need a new dev env for this.
Richard is talking about some *substantial* architecture here -- not
just a development environment but a *lot* of core library routines (as you
later speculate) and functionality that is either currently spread across
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Richard Loosemore wrote:
) Bo Morgan wrote:
) On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Richard Loosemore wrote:
)
) In regard to your comments about complexity theory: from what I understand,
) it is primarily about taking simple physics models and trying to explain
) complicated datasets
On 2/20/07, Mark Waser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Realistically, you'll have an AGI before the environment is completed
.
. . .
I think you slightly underestimate the difficulty of creating AGI ;)
Personally, I'd start with a commercial extensible development
environment and a
I think you slightly underestimate the difficulty of creating AGI ;)
I think that you grossly underestimate the magnitude of what is being proposed
because the tag development environment has been attached to it.:-)
Realistically, the development environment is both the AGI's DNA *and*
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Ben Goertzel wrote:
It's pretty clear that humans don't run FOPC as a native code, but
that we can learn it as a trick.
I disagree. I think that Hebbian learning between cortical columns
is essentially equivalent to basic probabilistic term logic.
On 2/20/07, Mark Waser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that you grossly underestimate the magnitude of what is being
proposed because the tag development environment has been attached to
it.:-)
*grin* No, I think it's a big project, at least the version I have in mind
(on my to-do list
On 2/20/07, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Novamente works fine on 64-bit machines -- but it took nearly a
man-month of work to 64-bit-ify the code, which was done back in 2004...
I guess I stand corrected on that one!
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
Also, why would 32 - 64 bit be a problem, provided you planned for
it in advance?
Name all the large, long-term projects that you know of that *haven't*
gotten bitten by something like this. Now, name all of the large,
long-term projects that you know of that HAVE gotten bitten repeatedly
On 2/20/07, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
It helps to remember that my target users are cognitive scientists who
want to be able to stay in a high-level thought mode (fancy way of
saying that my users ain't gonna be hackers).
Now I see why it would be a dev env, both from the
I think choosing an architecture for AGI is a much more important problem than
choosing a language. But there are some things we already know about AGI.
First, AGI requires a vast amount of knowledge, and therefore a vast amount of
computation. Therefore, at least part of the AGI will have
13 matches
Mail list logo
