There is one further point which is absolutely fundamental
in operating system/compiler theory. The user should be unaware of how the
work is divided up. A robot may simply have a WiFi router and very little
else, or it might have considerable on board processing. The user should not
be aware of th
like this (& the Genome Project):
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/health/research/13alzheimer.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
should become an ever bigger part of sci. & tech. Of course, with Alzheimer's
there is a great deal of commonly recognized ground. Not so with AGI. It might
be interesting to spec
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:40 AM, John G. Rose wrote:
> The ideological would still need be expressed mathematically.
>
I don't understand this. Computers can represent related data objects that
may be best considered without using mathematical terms (or with only
incidental mathematical functio
It would be easy to relativize a weighted network so that it could be used
to include ideas that can effectively reshape the network (or at least
reshape the virtual network) but it is not easy to see how this could be
done intelligently enough to produce actual intelligence. But maybe I
should tr
Single Neurons Can Detect Sequences
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100812151632.htm
---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https:/
I suppose that part of the "work" that it does is making people feel good
and being a neat conversation piece.
Interoperability and communications protocols can facilitate the path to
AGI. Just like the many protocols used on the internet. I haven't looked at
any for robotics specifically thoug
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Bromer [mailto:jimbro...@gmail.com]
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:40 AM, John G. Rose
> wrote:
> The ideological would still need be expressed mathematically.
>
> I don't understand this. Computers can represent related data objects
that may
> be best