Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3569 assigned to Alexis

I retracted it anyway. If I didn't, I now do. On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Oct 5, 2017, at 3:21 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > >> I call a CFJ with the statement "PRESENT is a valid vote in >> instant-runoff elections for offices”. > > AP

Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

> On Oct 5, 2017, at 2:11 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > On the 27th, I initiated elections for Tailor and Assessor. I had the > quorum at 2.0 but it was actually 8.0, I was right the first time. The > incorrect statement changed nothing. Therefore, the election is > extended by

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: argument in support of conditional voting

I do so. I request that a few days be given to provide people an opportunity to provide further arguments. -Aris On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:07 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I support > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: argument in support of conditional voting

I support On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I support. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Oct 5, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Aris Merchant >>

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: argument in support of conditional voting

I support. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 5, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I intend, with two support, to file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3569. I > may add some supplementary arguments

BUS: Re: DIS: argument in support of conditional voting

I intend, with two support, to file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3569. I may add some supplementary arguments later, but G. argues this pretty effectively. -Aris On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > First, I was incorrect when I say there will be "no

Re: BUS: Actions

Seeing the recent report reminds me that I never resolved the quoted intention, and I do so now. 天火狐 On 11 September 2017 at 00:09, Josh T wrote: > For the proposals numbered in the following set, I vote FOR: {7877, 7881, > 7882, 7885, 7886, 7887, 7888, 7889}. > >

BUS: PLEASE READ on voting

Hi folks, First, I don't want to be assessor past the election, I grabbed the job mainly because I was guessing quorum would be an issue and I didn't want my proposals (or ribbon) to languish. I won't be able to keep up with Assessor *especially* if e is required to track election votes (I'm

Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I vote PRESENT in both elections. I create a pledge as follows: If any player pays me 5 or more shinies, along with a name of a player and election, I will change my vote to the name of the player e specified in the election that e specified. If the player does not specify another player name, I

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017, 03:04 VJ Rada, wrote: > I don't think either your vote here or Gaelan's vote worked. According > to rule 955 as interpreted by Alexis's most recent CFJ, in this > context "the valid votes are ordered lists of options". PRESENT is not > an option in

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

Whoops fair cop, yup. I retract my most recent CFJ. Sorry Trigon. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > The same rule makes PRESENT an option later on. In fact, that clause > explicitly overrides the previous one: > > > "The previous

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3569 assigned to Alexis

I call a CFJ with the statement "PRESENT is a valid vote in instant-runoff elections for offices". On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:37 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > So uh let's self-ratify my ADoP report? Because every election I have > ever resolved didn't work according to this. > > On Thu,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

PF -- Trigon -- On Oct 5, 2017 1:11 AM, "Rubin Stacy" wrote: > Fine. Then let my vote be retracted and replaced with {PSS, G.}. Does that > work? > > -- > Trigon > -- > > On Oct 5, 2017 1:04 AM, "VJ Rada" wrote: > >> I don't

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I don't think either your vote here or Gaelan's vote worked. According to rule 955 as interpreted by Alexis's most recent CFJ, in this context "the valid votes are ordered lists of options". PRESENT is not an option in instant run-off votes as previously interpreted: therefore PRESENT votes are

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I conditionally vote for Assessor as follows: {Gaelan, PSS} followed by {all players nichdel votes for, in the order in which e votes for them, excluding Gaelan and PSS} Gaelan > On Oct 4, 2017, at 11:41 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > I shame them, rather than shaning them. And

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

In order to clear up any and all confusion, I retract my vote for Arbitor and replace it with a PRESENT vote. -- Trigon -- On Oct 5, 2017 12:39 AM, "VJ Rada" wrote: > Addendum: ENDORSE votes not being votes apparently, I also publically > shane Quazie, Trigon and

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I also issue such a reminder to o. for eir conditional Tailor vote. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:41 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I shame them, rather than shaning them. And what I meant was I issue > them Humiliating Public Reminders. > > I also clarify that I vote Alexis in the Tailor

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I shame them, rather than shaning them. And what I meant was I issue them Humiliating Public Reminders. I also clarify that I vote Alexis in the Tailor election and PRESENT for Assessor. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Addendum: ENDORSE votes not being votes

BUS: CFJ re Ben Öyle Öneriyorum and G: Overlord of Dunce

I use shinies to call a CFJ with the statement: "Ben Öyle Öneriyorum is an agency" Ben Öyle Öneriyorum was established in May with the powers of another agency called GOD. GOD's name was created and has always been listed as G is Overlord of Dunce, which is patently invalid as a name ("is" is a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

Ttttpf On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I vote Alexis in the first election and PRESENT in the second. > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >> On the 27th, I initiated elections for Tailor and Assessor. I had the >> quorum at

BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

On the 27th, I initiated elections for Tailor and Assessor. I had the quorum at 2.0 but it was actually 8.0, I was right the first time. The incorrect statement changed nothing. Therefore, the election is extended by another 7 days. The votes currently stand at this: ===Tailor=== Alexis: Alexis

Re: BUS: [Secretary] Innocent Mistake Ratification

> On Oct 5, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I intend, without objection, to ratify that, at the moment the Secretary > published eir purported Weekly Report on October 3rd, the Floating Value was > as follows: > > { > Floating Value: 132 > } Based on

BUS: Deregistration

Without objection, I intend to deregister our longest standing player, Murphy. If this goes through every player will have joined this year I think. ais deregistered recently, -- >From V.J. Rada

Re: BUS: Deregistration

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > Without objection, I intend to deregister our longest standing player, Murphy. > > If this goes through every player will have joined this year I think. > ais deregistered recently, I Object. -G.