And now for something completely different - the Herald doesn't know
what to do here so e's going to delay eir responsibility:
CFJ: At least one person won the game as a result proposal 8097
taking effect.
Caller's Arguments
Just the proposal in evidence, except I'd like to respectfully
Haha, I freely acknowledge that would be a significant weakness in my
interpretation, although I did try to address why that wouldn’t work in the
paragraph that comes after the one you quote. :-)
If twg’s purported transfer below was EFFECTIVE, then I transfer to myself
all liquid assets in twg’s
TTttPF
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:07 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I respond to your CoE by citing the CFJ inquiring into the statement "G.’s
> attempt in the message quoted below to transfer coins to the contract between
> em and D. Margaux is
I reject your CoE; my report contains the line "The First Bank of Agora
currently possesses 1006 coins."
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 5:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> CoE on Coins: Either my original coin holdings are stuck in the contract
> (and should
I respond to your first CoE by citing the CFJ inquiring into the statement "D.
Margaux’s attempt in this message to transfer coins to the contract between em
and G. is EFFECTIVE."
I respond to your second CoE by citing the CFJ inquiring into the statement
"The contract between D. Margaux and
CoE on Coins: Either my original coin holdings are stuck in the contract
(and should be recorded as belonging to the contract), or were
in my possession and decimated. They didn't just vanish.
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> UNREFINABLE CURRENCIES
>
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 5:49 PM, D Margaux wrote:
> The contract (we think) owns some coins. Under this Rule, the coins (an
> asset) can be “transferred by announcement by [the contract] to another
> entity.” This doesn’tnecessarily say that the announcement must be made by
> the owner
I CoE on my votes and Gaelan's votes on 8081. I believe it is
uncertain whether my conditional resolved to F or A, as it us uncertain
whether my transfers of coins to the contract succeeded.
This won't change the fact that 8081 was rejected, so there's no
game uncertainty that will propagate
LOL—it would be really funny if the coins are just stranded there forever, and
this line in the Treasuror report becomes a permanent monument to a sadly
failed scam.
But to prevent self-ratification while the CFJs are pending, I CoE the
Treasuror report on the ground that (1) maybe the
I withdraw the CFJ that I initiated earlier today, and instead CFJ (barring
twg): “The contract between D. Margaux and G. transferred at least one coin to
D. Margaux.”
twg said:
> By what rule-defined mechanism
> do you cause the contract to do this?
Below is my best effort to come up with
I eat 12 apples.
I move to each of the following Land Units, in order:
(-1, 2)
(0, 2)
(1, 2)
(2, 2)
(3, 2)
(3, 1)
(3, 0)
(3, -1)
(4, -1)
(5, -1)
(6, -1)
(6, -2)
According to the most recent Cartographor Weekly Report, there are 63 units of
Aether in existence.
I transfer all corn from the
G. wrote:
> I point my finger at CuddleBeam for Oathbreaking (breaking the above
> Pledge), as e is not tracking absolutely everything.
It is apparent beyond a reasonable doubt that Cuddle Beam has not tracked
absolutely everything. In particular, CuddleBeam is a player and, accordingly,
is
I cause the contract between me and G entitled the First Bank of Agora to
transfer to me a number of coins equal to the number of coins that I have
previously transferred to that contract.
I CFJ barring twg the following statement: "D. Margaux's attempt to
transfer coins from the First Bank of
This is an honor notification:
+1 CuddleBeam for an ingenious pledge
-1 D Margaux because eir karma is too high
--
D. Margaux
14 matches
Mail list logo
