On 8/14/2020 6:22 PM, ATMunn wrote:
On 8/14/2020 6:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
On 8/9/20 5:17 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Oh, okay, I think that's substantially different enough to require a new
intent, so I intend, with Agoran Consent, to
On 8/14/2020 6:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
On 8/9/20 5:17 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Oh, okay, I think that's substantially different enough to require a new
intent, so I intend, with Agoran Consent, to award the Badge of
Diplonomic to
On 8/14/20 5:51 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
> On 8/14/20 10:32 AM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
>> On 8/14/2020 6:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/9/20 5:17 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Oh, okay, I
On 8/14/20 10:32 AM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
> On 8/14/2020 6:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
> wrote:
>> On 8/9/20 5:17 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> Oh, okay, I think that's substantially different enough to require a new
>>> intent, so I
I grant G. 5 coins for the timely judgement of CFJ 3876.
On 8/14/2020 11:46 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I grant 5 coins to each of the following players for timely judgements:
>
>R. Lee (#3873 on 10 Aug): 0.414375 days
>
>
I grant 5 coins to each of the following players for timely judgements:
R. Lee (#3873 on 10 Aug): 0.414375 days
On 2020-08-14 14:43, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
On 8/13/2020 11:29 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
Title: Agoran Press
{
Purpose: support the documentation of Agoran events in a way that
informs current players and non-players and also supports future
research.
Whereas the
On 8/13/2020 11:29 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
Title: Agoran Press
{
Purpose: support the documentation of Agoran events in a way that
informs current players and non-players and also supports future
research.
Whereas the Agoran Press rewards its members only for the honourable
On 8/12/20 4:32 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> A) IN: 1 Victory Card, OUT: N Coins
> B) IN: 1 Legislative Card, OUT: N/2 (round down) Coins
> C) IN: 1 Justice Card, OUT: N/4 (round down) Coins
> D) IN: 1 Voting Card, OUT: N/4 (round down) Coins
I cause all parties to Automatable Exchange
On 8/14/2020 6:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
On 8/9/20 5:17 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Oh, okay, I think that's substantially different enough to require a new
intent, so I intend, with Agoran Consent, to award the Badge of
Diplonomic to
On 8/13/2020 11:17 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>
> I consent to, and do, amend the contract by replacing {lowest integer} with
> {lowest positive integer}.
>
> I revoke 5 coins in that contract's possession by announcement. [No Faking
> disclaimer: this may not work]
>
> I
On 8/9/2020 7:33 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 8/9/20 5:58 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:02 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
On 8/3/20 10:19 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Title:
On 8/14/2020 10:29 AM, ATMunn wrote:
On 8/13/2020 10:33 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
On 2020-08-09 20:02, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
FORBES FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY-SIX
On 8/13/2020 10:33 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
On 2020-08-09 20:02, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
FORBES FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY-SIX
or
On 8/13/2020 8:15 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> I create and become a party the following contact, titled "Somewhat Annoying
> Experiment": {
> The Eligible Revocation can be calculated as follows:
> Let x be the lowest integer that, represented as a decimal number in ASCII,
>
On 8/9/20 5:17 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Oh, okay, I think that's substantially different enough to require a new
> intent, so I intend, with Agoran Consent, to award the Badge of
> Diplonomic to ATMunn, G., Jason, Aris, Falsifian, R. Lee, omd, Trigon,
> Ben & Claire of BC
> On Aug 13, 2020, at 10:36 PM, Byron Krane via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Gratuitous arguments: There is probably no lowest integer with this
> property, because integers include negative numbers.
Ah, yep, duh, so my revocation definitely failed.
I consent to, and do, amend the contract
17 matches
Mail list logo
