BUS: Cleaning Up a Typo

I intend without objection to clean Rule 2635 "Floating Rate Fleet" by correcting the word "Floatation" to "Flotation". (Wait, does Rule 2221 "Cleanliness and Tidy Filing" even work? Rule 105 "Rule Changes" says that no other rule can provide a mechanism to modify rules, and they're both the

BUS: [@Ministor] Flipping Focus (again)

I plan to flip my Focus to Legislation. -- >From R. Lee

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Investigation of Trigon

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 12:46 AM Trigon via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2021 04:41, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 17/06/2021 04:15, Rebecca Lee via agora-official wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:08 PM Telna via agora-business < > >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Investigation of Trigon

On 17/06/2021 04:41, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote: On 17/06/2021 04:15, Rebecca Lee via agora-official wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:08 PM Telna via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: *sigh* I Point my Finger at Trigon for not tracking the Unit of Flotation in eir

BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Investigation of Trigon

On 2021-06-17 13:56, Rebecca Lee via agora-official wrote: This is my investigation of Telnaior's finger pointing at Trigon, here: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2021-June/046723.html Rule 2635 states that the Unit of Flotation is tracked in the

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (contracts)

I object to any intents in the below quoted message. - Jason On 6/16/21 9:38 PM, Rebecca Lee via agora-business wrote: > Sorry my phone wouldn't let me bottom post with such a long message. What I > meant to say (I really promise) is COE: I am listed as a member of team > Margaux but the history

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (contracts)

Sorry my phone wouldn't let me bottom post with such a long message. What I meant to say (I really promise) is COE: I am listed as a member of team Margaux but the history lists me as leaving On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 10:00 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (contracts)

I object to any intents in the below-quoted message. On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, 7:11 PM Rebecca Lee via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 7:54 AM ATMunn via agora-official < > agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > I publish the following report: > >

BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (contracts)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 7:54 AM ATMunn via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I publish the following report: > > > ██ ██ ███ ███ ██ █ ███ ██ > ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ > ██

BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3910 Assigned to Gaelan

> On Jun 16, 2021, at 2:30 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > Having received no further feedback, I rule FALSE. Arguments from the > draft below. > > Feel free to motion to reconsider if necessary, ofc I, er, self-file a motion to reconsider. I rule TRUE. Gaelan

BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3910 Assigned to Gaelan

Having received no further feedback, I rule FALSE. Arguments from the draft below. Feel free to motion to reconsider if necessary, ofc Gaelan > On Jun 13, 2021, at 1:51 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > Rule 2141/16 tells us that "a rule's content takes the form of a text". > While you could

BUS: Standing up

I wish to join the ordinary judges list (for now. I will quit when I flake again).

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (contracts)

I object to all intents in the below-quoted message. On 6/16/21 1:45 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 10:42 AM ATMunn via agora-official < > agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> I publish the following report: >> >> >> ██ ██ ███ ███ ██

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592

Clarifying: On 2021-06-16 14:00, Telna via agora-business wrote: 8585*   Murphy  3.0   Clarify variable voting periodFOR I vote FOR 8585. 8592&   ATMunn  1.0   Secret proposal DAGAINST I vote AGAINST 8592.