On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:39 PM D. Margaux wrote:
> I CFJ barring G. the statement: “G. violated Rule 2471 (No Faking) when e
> published a message that stated, ‘Oh for crying out loud. I object to
> everything. To everything, literally. I object.’”
>
> I plan to randomly assign the CFJ probably
I CFJ barring G. the statement: “G. violated Rule 2471 (No Faking) when e
published a message that stated, ‘Oh for crying out loud. I object to
everything. To everything, literally. I object.’”
I plan to randomly assign the CFJ probably on Friday, unless someone
expresses a favour before then.
I just wrote:
> We're in trouble if we start punishing people for expressing opinions.
In fact, let's demonstrate that.
I point the Finger at twg for misleading Agora in stating there are many
things I did not object to at that particular moment.
[If not referring to a dependent action, to
I Point my Finger at G. for violating Rule 2471/1, "No Faking", by publishing
the patently false statement in the quoted message. There are clearly many
things that e does not object to - for example, eir status as a player of
Agora, which e could easily remedy by deregistering.
I expunge my
Oh for crying out loud. I object to everything. To everything, literally.
I object.
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> Gaelan—winning the game would break your pledge! It would allow the PM to
> appoint you to an office (speaker).
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:18 AM Gaelan Steele
