On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 16:55 -0500, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> I intend to deputise for Registrar in two days. Ignore the Registrar's
> Report I just published. It is invalid because the office is filled.
CFJ: The above-quoted message is a claim of error.
Arguments: We define a claim of error as a
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:20 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Assessor to resolve Proposals 7437-7452.
I initiate a criminal case against the Assessor accusing em of violating
Rule 208 by failing to resolve Proposals 7437-7452 (two distributions'
worth) in a
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:13 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Assessor to resolve the decisions to
adopt proposals 7426-7436.
I intend to deputise for the Assessor to resolve the decisions to
adopt Proposals 7418-7425. (These are earlier, obviously, but I
forgot
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:13 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Assessor to resolve the decisions to
adopt proposals 7426-7436.
If I haven't already voted on these, I vote PRESENT on all of them.
(I sent a message to the list, but it was down so it told me that it
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I nominate Taral for CotC.
I decline.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
ais523 wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC to:
* Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2213a
* Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2203a
* Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2172a
I note that the CotC is very nearly overdue on one of these recusals,
and am getting the intent in
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decline this nomination.
I nominate Taral for CotC.
I nominate Murphy for CotC.
--Wooble
On 23 Oct 2008, at 14:24, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decline this nomination.
I nominate Taral for CotC.
I nominate Murphy for CotC.
--Wooble
I nominate myself for CotC, because it's probably easier than
Coinkeepor.
--
Wooble wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decline this nomination.
I nominate Taral for CotC.
I nominate Murphy for CotC.
I accept this nomination. I also predict that Taral will decline (or
at least not accept) eirs, as IIRC e ran away screaming
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, agreed, but I can't deputise for that.
I nominate ais523 for CotC.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:59 -0700, Taral wrote:
I nominate ais523 for CotC.
I decline this nomination.
I nominate Taral for CotC.
--
ais523
Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise to publish the IADoP's report for last week. The time
limit has already expired.
It's now a low-priority office, and so only has a monthly report.
-zefram
Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case 1804. The
time limit for assignment runs out in nearly 24 hours, so 48 hours after my
declaration of intent, I will be allowed to deputise.
At the time of your message, the pre-trial phase in this case
I wrote:
I intend to deputise for the office of Scorekeepor
for the purpose of publishing its report.
I hereby do so, and claim my Cyan VC.
Scorekeepor's Scoreboard
Date of this report: Sat 17 Nov 07
Date of last report: Fri 7 Sep 07
(All times are UTC)
RECENT EVENTS
Wed 18 Jul
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
Yes, this set of deputisations definitely wouldn't work.
Then, if Zefram wants to block the CFJs from being assigned, all he has to
do is neglect to change sitting players to standing. The worst I can do
is assign them all to different players.
15 matches
Mail list logo
