Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500 (Weekly Report)

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:48 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Oh nice, thanks! > > Notice of Honour > +1 PSS for catching up the treasury office. > -1 twg for the departure. > > Unfortunately, necessary CoE: one player may have 1 coin more than listed

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

Also missing my transfer from o: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-February/042174.html On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:16 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > > On 2/14/20 1:31 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-official wrote: > > 1048Jason > > >

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

On 1/11/20 12:30 AM, James Cook via agora-business wrote: > CoE on the below report: It's not clear whether Jason Cobb earned 18000 Coins. > > I respond to my CoE by citing CFJ 3783 ("Jason Cobb has more than 2000 > Coins."). > > If the case takes much longer to judge, one resolution, following

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 23:39, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2019 8:25 PM, James Cook > wrote: > > 10Jacob Arduino > > CoE: Jacob Arduino has no coins because e is no longer a player. Thanks. I'll publish a revision soon. > I intend without objection to declare

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 3:39 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2019 8:25 PM, James Cook > wrote: > > 10Jacob Arduino > > CoE: Jacob Arduino has no coins because e is no longer a player. > > I intend without objection to declare apathy, specifying all players. I

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

Accepted. Revision coming soon. On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 08:23, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > CoE: I earned 5 coins for judging CFJ 3750 in this message: > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg34280.html > > -twg > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Thursday, July 4,

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

Accepted. Revision coming soon. On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 23:35, Rebecca wrote: > > coe i spent 7 coins to perform the ritual (i said "i do so") > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 9:10 AM James Cook wrote: > > > > >

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

> CFJ: Rance paid 2 Coins to Agora twice on 2019-05-20. Arguments to follow. I withdraw this CFJ. (Everyone seems to agree it's FALSE.)

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 03:34, Rance Bedwell wrote: > I make a COE for this Treasuror's report. I posted two public messages > announcing that I paid 2 coins to Agora. If I had been wise I would have > made the second one conditional upon the first not succeeding. I was not > wise, so I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

Yeah, to be clear this seems like a fairly simple legislative fix. However, pursuant to the hash system not working for Spaceships (I think), I'd worked on a draft of "how to act by hashes" and came up against questions of retroactivity and evidence. So I'm used the ambiguity of "stating" in this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

I respond to the CoE by citing the CFJ. (I swear I remember there being a proto floating around at some point to change it so that just the existence of a relevant open CFJ would block self-ratification, instead of having to go through this rigmarole. Wonder what happened to that.) -twg

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

Addendum: Didn't notice that the evidence of the statement had been clipped off this thread. The message in question is this one: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-February/040091.html On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:48 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > CFJ, barring

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

As required to stop ratification pending the CFJ, I CoE on the same report. On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:04 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > Yes, I don't see how this is any different from "stating it to yourself". > Your publication of the hash (if it even is a hash - I see no evidence that >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

CFJ, barring twg: G. has earned 5 coins for the Herald's Report of 17-Feb-2019. I plan to provide proof to the judge of the CFJ that a statement containing the required earnings information hashes to the previously-published hash. CFJ 3714 implied fairly strongly that it is not required to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

Yes, I don't see how this is any different from "stating it to yourself". Your publication of the hash (if it even is a hash - I see no evidence that it's not just a random string of hexadecimal digits) didn't meaningfully communicate anything to anyone else. I deny the CoE, but feel free to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

All right, as there seems to be dissent about it... CFJ (barring G.): By sending a message at about 7:03pm UTC on 2019-02-18, G. earned 5 coins. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, February 18, 2019 7:58 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > No, I disagree. The point is that quang was a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

I cause L to issue a notice of honour: +1 to twg for a truly hideous pun -1 to G. for sending an angry sounding email when e actually was not angry after all > On Feb 18, 2019, at 4:06 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > I award CuddleBeam a Ribbon that is one of several shades of Gray. > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

I award CuddleBeam a Ribbon that is one of several shades of Gray. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, February 18, 2019 8:33 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > Kinky. > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:33 PM D. Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I point my toes at G. and cuddle beam

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

I point my toes at G. and cuddle beam for Faking. > On Feb 18, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > maah uyntz asee as myself and sunt Dictatorship, also, the game is now > Ossified and nobody can perform any game actions, having R1698 been broken > and whatnot. > >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

maah uyntz asee as myself and sunt Dictatorship, also, the game is now Ossified and nobody can perform any game actions, having R1698 been broken and whatnot. On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:10 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada > dada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

Dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada dada

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

This is a clear and direct application of Judge Murphy's interpretation of the Rewards Rule. If "quang" is allowed to reference a random cultural definition, I don't see why referencing something that is directly contained in the ruleset ("whatever is necessary to claim a reward") would fail

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

You mean this? On Monday, February 18, 2019 7:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On 2/17/2019 1:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Herald’s Weekly report > > Date of Last Report: 04 Feb 2018 > > Date of This Report: 17 Feb 2019 > > I state what is necessary to be Rewarded for the above-referenced report.

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

CoE: Still off I'm afraid. Zombies should get the May salary (that includes 3 Incs) but not the initial 5. (then some people transferred the Incs from their zombies to themselves when they transferred 'all assets' after May 1). On Sat, 5 May 2018, Corona wrote: > Accepted. Revision: > >

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

I deny this CoE. (reason: the only contract with assets was indeed listed in the table) On Thursday, May 3, 2018, Ned Strange wrote: > just kidding! I can't read! > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Ned Strange > wrote: > > Important CoE: You

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Forbes 500

just kidding! I can't read! On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Ned Strange wrote: > Important CoE: You have forgotten assets owned by Contracts > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Corona wrote: >> I deputize for the Treasuror to post the