I feel like writing the Newspaper every week is a burden, it's
starting to get rushed a lot, and on top of all that, it's not all
that useful because publishing it covering one week when the next week
is coming/passed is particularly awkward.
So I propose and pend:
Proposal: Monthly Distribution
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Sprocklem sprock...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-08-16 16:28, Luis Ressel wrote:
ID Author(s) AI Title
-
7785* G. 1.0 The New Map
FOR
7786* scshunt1.0 Monthly Distribution
FOR
Ditto.
-scshunt
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
ID Author(s) AI Title
--
7756+ Gaelan 1.0 Into the 21st century
AGAINST
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
*7753 scshunt 3.0 Title Caps Fix
I award myself an Orange Ribbon.
-scshunt
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
I intend to award myself the Patent Title Champion with 2 Agoran
Consent.
I object.
-scshunt
On Aug 1, 2015 20:22, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
Ok, here's what the first paradox was... What's your pseudo-judgement?
The Not Your Turn card would cancel the effect of any card played
in the last
Proposal: AI Fix (AI=3)
{{{
Amend the first paragraph of Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption
Indices) to read:
Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran
decisions and proposals, whose value is an integral
multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9, default 1.
}}}
-scshunt
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:29 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal, pend it, and specially deputise for
the Promotor to distribute it, thereby expediting it. For this
decision, the options are FOR and AGAINST, the vote collector is the
Assessor, and the AI is the
I issue Trust Tokens to Tekneek, Roujo, Ienpw III, and Murphy.
-scshunt
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: AI Fix (AI=3)
{{{
Amend the first paragraph of Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption
Indices) to read:
Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran
decisions
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
However, I don't believe proposal 7448's adoption index actually _was_
'none' at the time R106 was applied to it. According to R2034,
A public message purporting to resolve an Agoran decision constitutes
self-ratifying claims
I resign Assessor. Sorry guys, I can't quite do it at the moment.
-scshunt
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0400
Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
The previous intent having expired,
I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award aranea the Patent Title Nine
Months Long Service.
-scshunt
I
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I deputize for the Prime Minister to appoint scshunt to the office of
Speaker.
I award myself a Red Ribbon, a Platinum Ribbon, and an Ultraviolet
Ribbon, and award comex and ais523 Ultraviolet Ribbons.
I'm going to hold off
I want to make a competition, but there's a minor bug, so:
Proposal: Competition Pending (AI=1)
{{{
Amend rule 2431 (Proposal Competitions) by prepending Rules to the
contrary notwithstanding, if at any time a Competition Proposal in the
Proposal Pool is not pending, it immediately becomes
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
pp1scshunt 3.0 Tie-Breaking Votes
pp2scshunt 1.0 IADoP Salary Control
pp3scshunt 1.0 Blocking Power
pp4scshunt 3.0 High-Power Centralization
I pend whichever one of these isn't
The last ratified ruleset was published on April 7, 2014. Since then,
the following proposals have been adopted without having had an
adoption index specified upon submission:
7643 Mandatory Identification
7644 Make the Birthday Holiday line up wit
7663 IADoP fix
7676 The GNP Evaluation System
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Until a CFJ is resolved differently, the Rulekeepor agrees with this
more persuasive line. -G.
I CFJ { I possess the patent title Head of the Agoran Ceremonial Mint. }
Arguments:
As comex pointed out in the
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: Timelines (AI=1)
{{{
Amend Rule 2446 (The Agoran Newspaper) by replacing
past 7 days.
with
prior Agoran Week.
and by appending the following to the first paragraph:
When the Herald
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: IADoP Salary Control (AI=1)
I withdraw this proposal.
Proposal: IADoP Salary Control (AI=1)
{{{
Amend Rule 2455 (How to Pend a Proposal) by replacing
Each office has a spending power, which
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
also a valid vote).
On Jul 16, 2015 16:40, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
Player Used spending power (this week) total spending power
ais523 12
aranea 58
G. 04
Proposal: Timelines (AI=1)
{{{
Amend Rule 2446 (The Agoran Newspaper) by replacing
past 7 days.
with
prior Agoran Week.
and by appending the following to the first paragraph:
When the Herald publishes the Newspaper for a given Agoran
week, any obligation e has to publish
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
4. If PoA currently works where the rules are silent, then we
have to infer multiple messages in one email (one from the
Agent, one from the Principal). Your interpretation would
firmly break PoA if it exists now (not
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> ID Author(s)AI Title
>
> 7790+ the Warrigal, Bucky 1.0 Trust without borders
AGAINST. No representation without taxation.
-scshunt
Sean Hunt wrote:
Ergh, got the wrong list.
I register as coppro.
I hereby become a party to the following contracts:
The Agora Agricultural Association
Brainfuck Joust
The Werewolves of Nomic Crossing
The People's Bank of Agora
Political Action Commitee
Enigma
I submit the following proposal, named Report Accessibility, AI 1:
Create a new rule of Power 1, named Reports, with the following text:
{{{
When a player is required to publish a report, e SHALL do so using
one
I consent to The Cookie Jar.
I object to Murphy flipping the contestmaster of The Cookie Jar to Murphy.
I intend, without objection by any party to The Cookie Jar, to amend
paragraph 5 by replacing The initiation of a judicial case with The
initiation of a judicial case by a player four days
Case 2402 is effectively asking the same question as this one, however,
I will not defer to it as it is pending appeal.
The question at hand is whether or not the obligations created by 2234
change as time passes, and whether the obligation still exists. If it
does, Taral, as Scorekeepor, CAN
I CFJ the following statement:
{
If a rule requires a player to perform an action without making it
possible for em to do so, and there is a rule forbidding em from doing
so, e can take no action that is not in violation of a rule.
}
TtttPF.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Having previously announced my intent, now that the IADoP is oficially late...
I initiate six Agoran Decisions to choose the holder for each of the
following
six offices. Each decision is identified by its office. The eligible voters
for each decision are the
After having carefully considered the consequences of doing so,
including the fact that it opens up Agora to multiple easy wins; that it
reveals a serious flaw in the rules; and that it allows me to win, for
the duration of this message I will fail to interpret the first
paragraph of rule 2110 as
I join the Vote Market.
I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market as follows
in four days:
{{
Change section 2 to read
{The Broker is responsible for maintaining the Vote Market. The Broker
is coppro.}
}}
I intend, with support of the People, to amend the PBA as follows in
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without objection by any party to The Cookie Jar, to amend
paragraph 5 by replacing The initiation of a judicial case with The
initiation of a judicial case by a player four days from this message.
I have received no such objection. I perform the action as described
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I join the Vote Market.
I intend, without three objections, to amend the Vote Market as follows
in four days:
{{
Change section 2 to read
{The Broker is responsible for maintaining the Vote Market. The Broker
is coppro.}
}}
Hrm, I forgot another
Elliott Hird wrote:
On 2009-03-16, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I join the Vote Market.
It does not exist
That shouldn't stop me from agreeing to it, but if you wish to be pedantic:
If I was a party to any contract named the Vote Market, I cease to be a
party to it.
I create
Ed Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 2418 ==
Spent assets are destroyed, unless they are specified as being
transferred to a different owner than their previous owner.
The only place where the word spent is used in the rules is rule 2126.
I guess 13 proposals and 17 CFJs.
6140: FOR
6141: FOR
6142: FOR
6143: FOR
6144: FOR
6145: SELL(10VP - FOR)
6146: FOR
6147: FOR
6148: FOR
6149: ABSTAIN
6150: SELL(5VP)
6151: FOR
Sean Hunt wrote:
I nominate myself for the position of Promotor.
TtttPF
Sean Hunt wrote:
The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
Proposal 6152 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Pavitra
H.
AGAINST
Proposal 6153 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by coppro
Patch Bug 6121
FOR
Proposal 6154 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Goethe
Third SHOULD fix
AGAINST
Sean Hunt wrote:
I CFJ {Warrigal has, at the time of this message, voted on proposal 6164}.
I FAIL.
Ed Murphy wrote:
Wooble wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I CFJ {Warrigal has, at the time of this message, voted on proposal 6164}.
I FAIL.
That's probably not sufficiently clear to initiate a CFJ.
In context, I consider I FAIL
As it stands, Win by Renaissance is kind of broken. Of the twelve types
of Ribbons currently in existence, White can only be acquired twice (and
then only if you have been playing continuously since you started),
Magenta can only be acquired once a year, and Ultraviolet can be
acquired only once.
Sean Hunt wrote:
As it stands, Win by Renaissance is kind of broken. Of the twelve types
of Ribbons currently in existence, White can only be acquired twice (and
then only if you have been playing continuously since you started),
Magenta can only be acquired once a year, and Ultraviolet can
Proposal 6165 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=0) by Taral
Scorekeepor Discretion
AGAINST
Proposal 6166 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by comex
Periodic ruleset ratification
FOR
Sean Hunt wrote:
The following proto-proposal is named {Contractual Offices} with
Adoption Index 3 (text in square brackets is annotations and not part of
the actual proposal):
{{{
Create the following 2-power rule named {Contractual Offices}:
{{
A contract may define an office
Sean Hunt wrote:
I CFJ the statements {Rule 105 can, in whole or in part, prevent an
instrument from taking effect} and {If a proposal is caused to take
effect without explicitly being allowed to cause rule changes, it can
cause rule changes}. After some discussion in ##nomic, it isn't really
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
http://www.nomictools.com/agora/aaa
Federal Subsidy: 7
I request subsidization.
Just in case:
If proposal 6122 did create a new rule, then I cause said new rule to amend
itself to read 'This rule intentionally left blank' by means of rule 2243.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2426
== CFJ 2426 ==
This thing is a CFJ.
Given that CFJ 2407 asserts that if a statement can easily
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:04 -0400, comex wrote:
I intend to appeal this with 2 support, recommending REMAND. CFJ 1780
contradicts this paragraph; ais523 has indicated privately to me that
e disagrees with that judgement, but
Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Assessor: comex, Murphy
I endorse Rodlen.
Promotor: coppro, PerlNomic Partnership (PNP)
I vote coppro.
TtttPF
I agree to the following two pledges:
{
1. This contract is a public pledge named The Oyster.
2. Any party CAN terminate this contract by announcement.
3. Every party SHALL put the word {scallop} in a public message authored
by emself at least once per week.
}
{
1. This contract is a public
Sean Hunt wrote:
I CFJ {At the instant this call for judgment was called, The Shell was
owned by the Lost and Found Department}.
I CFJ {At the instant the quoted call for judgment was called, The Shell
had an owner}.
Caller's Arguments:
Rule 1586 specifies that when an entity ceases
Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:33 +, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:25 -0400, comex wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
ais523, comex, and coppro can join this contract by announcement. Other
players can join this contract
Ed Murphy wrote:
Denied. The history reflects that destruction. (The real discrepancy
is the creation of those rests in the first place; it happened on March
10, but I missed including it in the March 15 report.)
CoE: No CoE was submitted; the March 15 report has since self-ratified.
Taral
Sean Hunt wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Denied. The history reflects that destruction. (The real discrepancy
is the creation of those rests in the first place; it happened on March
10, but I missed including it in the March 15 report.)
CoE: No CoE was submitted; the March 15 report has since
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/3/26 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
well yeah, that's why I remember it... do you suppose you still have those
particular rests?
I think I do. I hope not to in the near future, though.
I feel kind.
I spend D D to destroy a Rest in ehird's possession. If he has
Sean Hunt wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I flip my posture to sitting.
-Yally
I flip my judicial rank to Supreme.
I flip my judicial rank to Supreme.
I submit the following proposal, AI 1, II 0, named {coppro Can't Post}:
{{{
Create a new 1-power rule with the following text
comex wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document, which
is part of an official report: { Every eligible voter voted FOR the
decision of whether to adopt proposal 6167. No other ballots were
cast on that decision. }
I object.
Also, which official report?
WHEREAS mutations are meant to be chaotic, and
WHEREAS we have an officer assigned to anarchy,
I submit the following proposal named {Mutant Anarchy}, II 0, AI 1
{{{
Change the name of rule 2216 to {The Repeal-O-Matic (and the Mutator)}
and amend it by adding a new bullet with the following text:
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I nominate root for Grand Poobah ;).
Oh sure, dump more responsibilities on the new guy.
-root
I'll help you out!
I nominate myself for Grand Poobah.
Sean Hunt wrote:
Note that I'm aware my voting limit on ordinary decisions is not 8; I am
nevertheless registering 8 votes on each proposal.
Proposal 6168 (Ordinary, AI=1.1, Interest=1) by Warrigal
A Silly Bribe
FORx1, PRESENTx7
I intend, with 2 support, to convert the Agoran Decision
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I create a digit ranch with a seed of 3 in coppro's possession.
I create a WRV in coppro's possession.
I request subsidy.
I purchase a mill
I submit the following proposal, entitled {Instant Adoption}, AI 3, II
1, coauthored by Goethe:
{{{
Create a new power-3 rule:
{{
A player may cause instant adoption of a proposal that has not
yet been voted on with A*P/(A+1) support, rounded down to the
nearest integer, where A
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
ID Number: 6190
Title: Deputised duties go away
Author: Murphy
Adoption Index: 3.0 (Democratic)
Interest Index: 0
CoE: I did not request II=0.
Admitted. Since this means the Agoran Decision was never intiated, I CoE
myself for not including the propsal
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2437
== CFJ 2437 ==
Goethe recently flipped the Caste of at least 2 players to
Alpha.
Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 23:54 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Caste of all players
Alpha: (Voting limit: 8) (Player limit: 1) (Lost at start of month)
---
Billy Pilgrim
Beta: (Voting limit: 5
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I flip Billy Pilgrim's caste to Alpha.
I nominate myself as Grand Poobah.
Why are you angry about that? It was the only legal choice.
I nominate myself for Grand Poobah.
I create and agree
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I deputise for IADoP to announce that the election for Scorekeepor has
one valid candidate, root, who is hereby installed into that office.
If my earlier
Sean Hunt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I deputise for IADoP to announce that the election for Scorekeepor has
one valid candidate, root, who is hereby installed
Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
CoE: I'm pretty sure I have /some/ caste. I'm not on any of these lists.
Admitted. You're caste is Epsilon.
Given that no one else has levied a CoE, I issue the following corrected
report:
Caste of all players
Alpha: (Voting limit: 8
I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the
holder of the IADoP office. The eligible voters are the active
players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the options are coppro and
Yally.
I endorse Yally for IADoP.
I request subsidization.
I nominate myself for
Ed Murphy wrote:
Fri 27 Mar 23:30:00 comex : comex coppro(Ruleset error)
CoE: I should be listed at 15 props.
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2424b
I opine AFFIRM.
CFJ 2423 and empirical evidence show that there is clearly an ambiguity
in the specification of Murphy's rule change, as the method of the rule
change was unclear. Rule 105 states that {Any
I guess 7 proposals and 11 CFJs for next week.
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Given that http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic is no longer
accessible, it will no longer be considered a forum.
-Yally
It is ##nomic, not #%23nomic. It is accessible; I am in it right now.
And you cannot declare something not to be a forum - you could try
flipping
Sean Hunt wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Given that http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic is no longer
accessible, it will no longer be considered a forum.
-Yally
It is ##nomic, not #%23nomic. It is accessible; I am in it right now.
And you cannot declare something not to be a forum - you
I leave the PBA.
I leave Brainfuck Joust.
I grant my consent to the publicization of Vote Market II and ask Murphy
to do the same.
I publish the text of Vote Market II, making it a public contract:
{{
1. The name of this contract is the Vote Market II.
2. The Brokor is a role. Its holder must issue reports as if it were an
office. Its holder is responsible for maintaining the Vote Market.
Initially the Brokor is coppro, it
Sean Hunt wrote:
I post a Buy Ticket for 1 Mill with an operator of - for someone to
transfer me a Mill with an operator other than -.
*grumblegrumblegrumble*
TtttPF
I also intend to remember that I have to issue Brokor reports starting
next week.
Sean Hunt wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2437a
The fundamental question here is whether or not R2160 was satisfied for
the purposes of the actions Goethe performed.
R2160 requires 4 conditions to be met to allow a player to perform
comex wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the
holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters
I mill 9 - 5 = 4.
If I have another 5 crop, I mill 5 - 3 = 2.
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published
Registrar's report (as of the time I perform the action) provided it has
not had a CoE or inquiry case levied against it. The scope will be to
ratify the document in its entirety as being a complete
Charles Reiss wrote:
On 4/11/09 8:23 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published
Registrar's report (as of the time I perform the action) provided it has
not had a CoE or inquiry case levied against it. The scope
I submit the following proposals:
Depending Actions (AI=3, II=3, comex is a coauthor)
{{{
Amend Rule 1728, Dependent Actions, by adding a new bullet reading
{{
e) If a set of conditions for the performance of the action was
given in the announcement of intent to perform the
I intend, without three objections, to make each of the following
amendments to the Vote Market II. Each is a separate dependent action.
Replace
{{
1. The name of this contract is the Vote Market II
}}
with
{{
1. The name of this public contract is the Vote Market II. Any party may
amend this
Sean Hunt wrote:
Replace
{{
3. The Brokor's monthly report shall contain a record of every change in
VP in the last 90 days. The Brokor's weekly report shall contain the
status of every Buy or Sell Ticket for which the status has changed
since the previous report and the report he
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Registrar's Census
I publish an NoV alleging that Yally violated R1789, a power-2 rule,
by publishing a Registrar's Report that does not ensure that
henceforth all may know that Kelly
Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
6196 pragmatic ribbons D 2.0 1 Wooble
FOR
6197 Refactor contracts D 2.0 1 Murphy
FOR
6198 Depower winningD 2.0 1 Murphy
FOR
6199 Ancient history is low-priority
I CFJ the statement {This statement is FALSE.}
Sean Hunt wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/4/13 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2447
== CFJ 2447 ==
Immediately after this case is assigned to a judge, the set
Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
coppro 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 3
I mill 9 - 5 = 4.
I purchase a digit ranch.
TtttPF
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I deputize for the IADoP to resolve the Agoran Decision to choose the
holder of the IADoP office.
The votes are:
coppro - Yally (endorsed Yally)
Yally - Yally
The outcome is FAILED QUORUM; the voting period is doubled.
I decline my nomination for IADoP.
I
Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2448
According to the evidence submitted by the caller, the the question is
esentially reduced to {For the purposes of Enigma, Enigma's
contestmaster is a contestant of Enigma.}. There is no provided
definition of
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I harvest the number 2447, ID number of a recently assigned CFJ, using
crops 2, 4, 4 and 7.
I harvest the numbers 2448 and 2449, the ID numbers of two recently
assigned CFJs, using the crops transferred to me by root, for two WRVs.
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without three objections, to make each of the following
amendments to the Vote Market II. Each is a separate dependent action.
Having received no objections, I do each of those except the first, and
the one posted in my followup message.
I mill 9 - 9 = 0.
The new
1 - 100 of 1878 matches
Mail list logo