Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

> On Oct 5, 2017, at 2:11 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > On the 27th, I initiated elections for Tailor and Assessor. I had the > quorum at 2.0 but it was actually 8.0, I was right the first time. The > incorrect statement changed nothing. Therefore, the election is > extended by

Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I vote PRESENT in both elections. I create a pledge as follows: If any player pays me 5 or more shinies, along with a name of a player and election, I will change my vote to the name of the player e specified in the election that e specified. If the player does not specify another player name, I

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017, 03:04 VJ Rada, wrote: > I don't think either your vote here or Gaelan's vote worked. According > to rule 955 as interpreted by Alexis's most recent CFJ, in this > context "the valid votes are ordered lists of options". PRESENT is not > an option in

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

Whoops fair cop, yup. I retract my most recent CFJ. Sorry Trigon. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > The same rule makes PRESENT an option later on. In fact, that clause > explicitly overrides the previous one: > > > "The previous

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

PF -- Trigon -- On Oct 5, 2017 1:11 AM, "Rubin Stacy" wrote: > Fine. Then let my vote be retracted and replaced with {PSS, G.}. Does that > work? > > -- > Trigon > -- > > On Oct 5, 2017 1:04 AM, "VJ Rada" wrote: > >> I don't

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I don't think either your vote here or Gaelan's vote worked. According to rule 955 as interpreted by Alexis's most recent CFJ, in this context "the valid votes are ordered lists of options". PRESENT is not an option in instant run-off votes as previously interpreted: therefore PRESENT votes are

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I conditionally vote for Assessor as follows: {Gaelan, PSS} followed by {all players nichdel votes for, in the order in which e votes for them, excluding Gaelan and PSS} Gaelan > On Oct 4, 2017, at 11:41 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > I shame them, rather than shaning them. And

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

In order to clear up any and all confusion, I retract my vote for Arbitor and replace it with a PRESENT vote. -- Trigon -- On Oct 5, 2017 12:39 AM, "VJ Rada" wrote: > Addendum: ENDORSE votes not being votes apparently, I also publically > shane Quazie, Trigon and

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I also issue such a reminder to o. for eir conditional Tailor vote. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:41 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I shame them, rather than shaning them. And what I meant was I issue > them Humiliating Public Reminders. > > I also clarify that I vote Alexis in the Tailor

Re: OFF: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

I shame them, rather than shaning them. And what I meant was I issue them Humiliating Public Reminders. I also clarify that I vote Alexis in the Tailor election and PRESENT for Assessor. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Addendum: ENDORSE votes not being votes

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

Ttttpf On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I vote Alexis in the first election and PRESENT in the second. > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >> On the 27th, I initiated elections for Tailor and Assessor. I had the >> quorum at

BUS: [ADoP] Election Time Extension

On the 27th, I initiated elections for Tailor and Assessor. I had the quorum at 2.0 but it was actually 8.0, I was right the first time. The incorrect statement changed nothing. Therefore, the election is extended by another 7 days. The votes currently stand at this: ===Tailor=== Alexis: Alexis