D. Margaux wrote:
Fair enough. This is CFJ 3678. I assign it to Murphy.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:22 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
I CFJ “By sending a message at 3:35 PM Pacific on October 27, G.
performed
one or more regulated actions.”
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday,
Hmm. If you're aiming at the loophole I think you're aiming at, the Buried
Intent Prevention Act definitely closed it (if R1728 didn't already). But if
not, I confess myself baffled.
Unless this is all just master-level trolling.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, October 29,
Fair enough. This is CFJ 3678. I assign it to Murphy.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:31 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> E could recuse, find it INSUFFICENT, publish a disclaimer with the ruling,
> or probably get out of it in several other ways that I haven’t thought
