I wrote:
Voting is now open. I need a vote from all townspersons other than
Wooble (that's root, Zefram, ais523, ehird, comex, Quazie, and Pavitra).
Received three votes, still waiting for the other four.
Alexander Smith wrote:
Zefram, avpx, why did you vote AGAINST ?
Should be in the rule that defines by announcement.
-zefram
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root broke rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance with the
Brainfuck Golf contract.
The part of the contract root allegedly failed to comply with:
The Brainfuck Golf contract, reads, in part:
{{{
11) The
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:03 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sentence states that ideally, the contestmaster is root. There
are three possible interpretations of this:
1. The contract is merely requesting that the contestmaster be root.
2. If there is a contestmaster, e SHALL be root.
2008/6/21 comex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jun 20 10:55:48 tusho I attempt to learn grammar and spelling. - Quazie
Jun 20 10:55:56 tusho hm
Jun 20 10:55:58 tusho that's to a-b
Jun 20 10:56:03 tusho so what if he doesn't? that's illegal?
Jun 20 10:56:48 tusho LOL - TIYAEOTISIDTIDFTHPAFALT
Jun 20
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I inform all parties of the Bank of Agora of CFJ 2018, and invite them
to submit arguments regarding the equitability of the situation.
I recommend that the Bank of Agora contract be terminated.
Comments?:
1. This is a public contract, the name of which is the Protection Racket.
2. Any player CAN join this contract by announcement. When a
first-class player joins this contract for the first time one Favor is
created in eir possession. Parties to this contract are known as Dons.
Any Don
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments?:
1. This is a public contract, the name of which is the Protection Racket.
2. Any player CAN join this contract by announcement. When a
first-class player joins this contract for the first time one Favor is
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5564 D0 2rootRepeal Partnerships
AGAINST
If I may ask, why do you support retaining a construct that is only
useful for running scams?
-root
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGAINST (I still think partnerships have viable uses (such as the Bank
of Agora). I would however support restricting the ability to create
large quantities of partnerships in a short period of time)
The Bank of Agora is
BobTHJ wrote:
Any Don CAN post their intention to leave this contract. Two weeks
after doing so they cease to be bound by this contract. Any Don can
cause another Don to cease to be bound by this contract without the
objection of a Don.
Do you intend to allow the would-be target to object?
11 matches
Mail list logo
