On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5564 D0 2 root Repeal Partnerships > AGAINST
If I may ask, why do you support retaining a construct that is only useful for running scams? -root
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5564 D0 2 root Repeal Partnerships > AGAINST
If I may ask, why do you support retaining a construct that is only useful for running scams? -root