On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 12:39 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:12 AM, warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Potato is any string whose SHA-523 hash
I don't think I've heard of that one...
-root
Neither have I, but I'm going to have to invent it now, given my name.
Another
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:17 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
bham.ac.uk is having email problems at the moment; I can send emails,
but haven't been able to receive any since about 13:00UTC on Friday.
I've been reading Agora email since by looking at TNP2's inbox (thanks,
TNP2, for that), but this
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the
record, Quazie and comex were the werewolves, and root was the seer.
For the record, you guys lynched me for nominating comex.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(However, Normish seems to be spam-blacklisted for
some unknown reason; therefore, I can't send from it in such a way that
other people will receive. This has been known to cause the mailing
lists to stop sending to it before
Ah, a Bayes title so good I had to make a proto around it. Maybe it
wouldn't be a good idea to do this immediately, but let us explore the
corner cases of Caste first; on the other hand, if people don't like
Caste, this might be something interesting to replace it with. (It also
reminds me a lot
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the support of The People I intend to amend the PBA like so:
I object.
I'd prefer to leave the lost found department out of it, and have
coins created in the possession of the PBA when anyone destroys them
without
On 20 Oct 2008, at 14:07, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I do agree that the existing coins in the PBA's possession should be
destroyed, and that withdrawing assets should involve the destruction
of coins rather than transfer to the PBA.
Feel free to write a different draft, I'm amending it enough
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 00:09 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008, at 23:52, Ian Kelly wrote:
The number in circulation should be equal to the number required to
withdraw everything. If there are extra coins in circulation, the
excess are worthless. If there are insufficient coins in
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intent to amend the PBA by adding: {After this section takes effect, the
RBoA ceases
to be a member of this contract, then this section is repealed.}
I object. The RBoA should be free to put itself in a position to lose
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 20:06 -0400, ihope wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I create the following contract:
{
1. This is a public contract called the UNDAD.
2. Anyone can join this contract by announcement. Joining this
contract is known as
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
Therefore, the only situation in which I don't have to be informed is if
UNDEAD is not a contract at all.
You mean to say, the only reason you SHOULD not be informed is if the
would-be informers have weighed the consequences of doing so. -G.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
It's now possible to become a member of the PNP by, and only by,
performing an action in PerlNomic that causes activity. All such actions
require knowledge of the member in question's PerlNomic username and
password, and active free will by someone to
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 18:53 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
[Actions in this message are meant to take place in order. If an action
fails, I intend to continue with the others regardless. Also, I intend
PBA actions to happen even if I have the number of Coins wrong.]
I withdraw two 0 crops from the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I go to that website, I see a series
of scripts. It would be quite possible for me to click on one of those
scripts and unknowingly take an action. It is quite possible that it
is IMPOSSIBLE to join perlnomic as the
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I go to that website, I see a series
of scripts. It would be quite possible for me to click on one of those
scripts and unknowingly take an action. It is quite possible that
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Actions in this message are meant to take place in order. If an action
fails, I intend to continue with the others regardless. Also, I intend
PBA actions to happen even if I have the number of Coins wrong.]
I withdraw two
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 12:32 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
Can somebody post the current PBA rates and holdings?
I'm trying to work them out right now. I think there are as many as 6
different possibilities for what happened, due to typos in my scam...
--
ais523
On 20 Oct 2008, at 19:32, Ian Kelly wrote:
Can somebody post the current PBA rates and holdings?
-root
ais is kindly working them out for me.
I recommend that you change all your chits into coins soon, as I
believe the RBoA is now
effectively worthless.
--
ehird
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 13:58, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
The following is a list of the assets tracked by the Outer Head of the
Agoran Illuminati and holdings of each.
The Sacred Chao: owned by Wooble
chaos:
0x44: 4
ais523: 10
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:39 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the PBA has exactly six X crops, I withdraw two X crops from the PBA.
I deposit all my Coins in the RBoA, for an appropriate number of Chits.
By my calculations,
On 20 Oct 2008, at 20:39, Ian Kelly wrote:
By my calculations, the RBoA has at least 813 coins and very little
else. That make coins worth more than 20 chits apiece.
I believe I have 4337 chits. I withdraw 394 coins for 4334 chits; if
I have fewer chits than 4334, then I withdraw as many
On 20 Oct 2008, at 21:10, Ian Kelly wrote:
There were 75 deposited by Pavitra, 75 deposited by Wooble, and 663
from the scam. What am I missing?
-root
Thanks. I missed Pavitra's. Fixed. RBoA has 850 coins.
--
ehird
On Monday 20 October 2008 07:58:15 am Alex Smith wrote:
An eligible word is any word which occurs in a Rule, and/or any
word defined in a well-known English dictionary.
I'd rather have it just be the Rules. We don't have to deal with
ambiguous dictionaries, and there'll be maneouvreing to pass
On Sunday 19 October 2008 11:02:20 am warrigal wrote:
(Did I mention that I was expecting you guys to pick random
positive integers rather than using random bits elsewhere? Oh well.
And Pavitra, do you have an existing program that's capable of
finding Potatoes?)
I used Hashcash, before you
On 20 Oct 2008, at 21:22, warrigal wrote:
I withdraw as many coins as possible from the RBoA.
--Warrigal of Escher
I have absolutely no idea how many this is due to the recent stuff.
Anyone know?
--
ehird
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:21 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2008 12:02:55 pm Alex Smith wrote:
I join the Note Exchange. I fill the open Buy Ticket to create Note
Markers. (How many do I have to create?).
If you're referring to my Crescendo ticket, then it's six different
On 20 Oct 2008, at 21:22, warrigal wrote:
I withdraw as many coins as possible from the RBoA.
--Warrigal of Escher
Scratch that. This fails, you are not a Comrade.
--
ehird
On 20 Oct 2008, at 22:37, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 21:22, warrigal wrote:
I withdraw as many coins as possible from the RBoA.
--Warrigal of Escher
Scratch that. This fails, you are not a Comrade.
--
ehird
Actually, if you specified an actual chit value they would be
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:01, Charles Reiss wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:22, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
2223 ais523UNDEAD PT ends 10/23
05:02:46
Claim of Error: ais523 is not a party to UNDEAD and it is not a
pledge, so this case was not
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:01, Charles Reiss wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:22, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
2223 ais523UNDEAD PT ends 10/23 05:02:46
Claim of Error: ais523 is not a party to UNDEAD and it
BobTHJ - please publish an RBoA report as soon as possible, because I
don't think anyone really knows the current state of it. Be sure to
read ais523's interpretation email,
ofc. But yes, we really need to know.
(So that everyone can evacuate quicker, naturally. ;-) )
--
ehird
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
I inform the parties to the following contracts of the following equity
cases, and invite them to submit arguments regarding the equitability of
the situation:
UNDEAD
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 15:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
I inform the parties to the following contracts of the following equity
cases, and invite them to submit arguments regarding the equitability of
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
Well, the way it used to be was that the judge did informs, and the
Notary informed them of the parties. A proposal a while back introduced
a bug in this by changing the informs from the judge to the CotC (it was
after I joined, so quite recent). This
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
This is, of course, why you SHOULD inform the Notary; so that judicial
cases with respect to the contract can go through expediently.
Actually, it occurs to me that informing the Notary of parties !=
informing the Notary on how to contact parties. So
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
It was created in Agora. It is bound by the rules of Agora. Agora is not a
host
for your
personal ninja club any more than incidentally. They're not your private
affairs.
Bha hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Oh
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:45, warrigal wrote:
I withdraw as many coins as possible from the RBoA.
Thanks a bunch. More unknown gamestate. Sigh. We need BobTHJ's report.
--
ehird
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:39, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Bha hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Oh thanks ehird, that's
sincerely the best
ironic laugh I've had in this forum since you joined.
I'd love for you to point out the things I've done to make that
hypocritical, if you
please.
--
ehird
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:32, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Unless of course you'd rather the courts stayed out of your private
affairs, in which case this is part of the full implications that you
weigh when not doing something that you SHOULD.
It was created in
On 21 Oct 2008, at 00:09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It also means that fishing expeditions led by non-members armed
with the potential name of a contract (but nothing more) should be
discouraged by the Rules lest the means become a burden. I hope the
current case does so discourage.
Scam plotting
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 00:09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It also means that fishing expeditions led by non-members armed
with the potential name of a contract (but nothing more) should be
discouraged by the Rules lest the means become a burden. I hope the
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Joshua Boehme wrote:
Having just re-subscribed, I have no clue what is happening. Seeing as
how that has yet to stop me, I register as a player. In the past, I
have used the nickname Elysion, and since confusion seems to abound
at the present I suppose I shall continue
On Oct 20, 2008, at 7:29 PM, Joshua Boehme wrote:
Having just re-subscribed, I have no clue what is happening. Seeing
as how that has yet to stop me, I register as a player. In the
past, I have used the nickname Elysion, and since confusion seems
to abound at the present I suppose I
On Monday 20 October 2008 06:49:17 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
avpx:
There once was a man from Agora
who replied not to the public fora.
His votes were submitted,
but his say was omitted,
though his ballots were cast in plethora.
Applause!
ehird:
(b) A Patent Title
On Oct 20, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
avpx:
There once was a man from Agora
who replied not to the public fora.
His votes were submitted,
but his say was omitted,
though his ballots were cast in plethora.
Concise, yet tells a full story. Good job.
ehird:
OscarMeyr wrote:
Appeal 2172a
I missed this one, and I don't have the time to look at it. If
possible, I recuse myself from 2172a.
It isn't, but I'll recuse the panel and assign a new one the next
time I catch up on judicial
0x44 wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
I request fnordization.
You request what?
Quiet, you.
ais523 wrote:
[Actions in this message are meant to take place in order. If an action
fails, I intend to continue with the others regardless. Also, I intend
PBA actions to happen even if I have the number of Coins wrong.]
I withdraw two 0 crops from the PBA. I deposit two 0 crops in the
The following is a proto-contest. Kudos to the Werewolves of Agora
Nomic contest for providing templating.
1a) The name of this public contract is The Cylons of Battlestar
Agora.
1b) The purpose of this contract is to be a contest.
1c) Any first-class person CAN become a party to this
49 matches
Mail list logo
