...where Lower Deck is adjacent to Enginge Room
which is also adjacent to Bridge.
Which is adjacent to what now? I can parse which is also as applying
to either Engine Room or Lower Deck.
-G.
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, comex wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
6765 P 1 3.0 comex Adoption Without Objection
AGAINST (Whether or not I like the idea in general - I haven't
decided - it doesn't give consideration to
I am attempting to republish the PSM's report which requires knowing which
players are Marines, Pilots, Captains, etc. Do you know which players are
which?
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
6765 P 1 3.0 comex Adoption Without Objection
AGAINST
Why?
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proposal: More ID numbers (AI=2, Distributable via fee)
Does this mean you just paid the fee? That looks like CFJ-worthy
ambiguity there...
Yeah, by the letter of it I'm not sure it's possible to make a
proposal
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, comex wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Proposal: More ID numbers (AI=2, Distributable via fee)
Does this mean you just paid the fee? That looks like CFJ-worthy
ambiguity there...
Yeah, by the letter of it I'm not
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I think we've always been ok with I submit the following proposal and pay a
fee to make it distributable: and there was some court case a long time
ago that it was ok. Maybe not. It was the fact that your sentence no
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I don't think it's common enough to make a significant difference, and
it's rather unusual IMO that proposals in the Proposal Pool have to be
referred to by title when just about every other tracked body of text
has an
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
In creating my proposal archive, I did notice that Zefram used a pool
number, distinct from the distributed proposal ID. I don't know if
this was just for eir own recordkeeping or if it was rules-defined
when e was Promotor; I don't remember it
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 19:43, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
19+ = Pilot (highest = Captain)
9- = Marine
Pilots require at least 23 props.
Players with at least 23 props are Pilots; the Pilot with the
most props (if any) is the Captain. Players with less than 9
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Yally wrote:
Pilots require at least 23 props.
Players with at least 23 props are Pilots; the Pilot with the
most props (if any) is the Captain. Players with less than 9
props are Marines.
Both
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
In creating my proposal archive, I did notice that Zefram used a pool
number, distinct from the distributed proposal ID. I don't know if
this was just for eir own
On 07/23/2010 01:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
6761 P None 2.0 coppro I Postulate an Assumption
AGAINST [just make it flip to Assumed when a player assumes an office, I say]
Your proposed fix a) breaks the MWoP and b) doesn't solve the problem
that when an officer goes on hold, the
On 07/26/2010 01:13 PM, comex wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
6765 P 1 3.0 comex Adoption Without Objection
AGAINST (Whether or not I like the idea in general - I haven't
decided - it doesn't give consideration to
14 matches
Mail list logo
